请阅读短文,完成此题。It is frequently assumed that the mechanization of work has a revolutionary effect on the livesof the people who operate the new machines and on the society into which the machines have beenintroduced. For example, it has been suggested that the employment of women in industry takethem out of the. household, their traditional sphere and fundamentally alter their position in society.In the nineteenth century, when women began to enter factories, Jules Simon, a French politician,warned that by doing so, women would give up their femininity. Fredrich Engels, however,predicted that women would be liberated from the"social, legal, and economic subordination" ofthe family by technological developments that made possible the recruitment of "the whole femalesex .., into public industry." Observers thus differed concerning the social desirability ofmechanization's effects, but thev agreed that it would trmsiorm women's lives.Historians, particularly thnse investigating the history of women, now seriously question thisassumption of transforming power. They conclude that such dramatic technological innovations asthe spinning jenny, the sewing tnachine, the typewriter, and the vacuum cleaner have not resultedin equally dramatic social changes in women's economic position or in the prevailing evaluation ofwomen's work. The employment of young women in textile mills during the Industrial Revolutionwas largely and extension of an older pattern of employment for young, single women as domestics.It was not the change in office technology, but rather the separation of secretarial work, previouslyseen as an apprenticeship for beginning managers, from administrative work that in the 1880'screated a new class of "dead end" jobs, thenceforth considered "women's work". The increase inthe numbers of married women enployed outside the home in the twentieth century, had less to dowith the mechanization of housework and an increase in leisure time for these women than it didwith their own economic necessity and with high marriage rates that shrank the available pool ofsingle women worke, previously, in many cases, the only women employers would hire.Women's work has changed considerably in the past 200 years, moving from the household tothe ofiice or the factory, and later becoming mostly white-collar instead of blue-collar work. Fundamentally, however, the conditions under which women work have changed little since the Industrial Revolution: the segregation of occupatious by gender, lower pay for women as a group,jobs that require relatively low levels of skill and offer women little opportunity for advancement all persist, while women's household labour remains demanding. Recent historical investigation has led to a major revision of the notion that lec.hnology is always inherently revolutionary in its effectson society. Mechanization may even have slowed any change in the traditional position of womeu both in the labour market and in the home.What is the main idea of the first paragraph?查看材料A.The mechanization of work has a revolutionary eftct.B.The social mechanization would "aftct women's lives.C.The social status of women has changed.D.Observers have different ideas about the effect of social mechanizatiou.
请阅读短文,完成此题。
It is frequently assumed that the mechanization of work has a revolutionary effect on the livesof the people who operate the new machines and on the society into which the machines have beenintroduced. For example, it has been suggested that the employment of women in industry takethem out of the. household, their traditional sphere and fundamentally alter their position in society.In the nineteenth century, when women began to enter factories, Jules Simon, a French politician,warned that by doing so, women would give up their femininity. Fredrich Engels, however,predicted that women would be liberated from the"social, legal, and economic subordination" ofthe family by technological developments that made possible the recruitment of "the whole femalesex .., into public industry." Observers thus differed concerning the social desirability ofmechanization's effects, but thev agreed that it would trmsiorm women's lives.
Historians, particularly thnse investigating the history of women, now seriously question thisassumption of transforming power. They conclude that such dramatic technological innovations asthe spinning jenny, the sewing tnachine, the typewriter, and the vacuum cleaner have not resultedin equally dramatic social changes in women's economic position or in the prevailing evaluation ofwomen's work. The employment of young women in textile mills during the Industrial Revolutionwas largely and extension of an older pattern of employment for young, single women as domestics.It was not the change in office technology, but rather the separation of secretarial work, previouslyseen as an apprenticeship for beginning managers, from administrative work that in the 1880'screated a new class of "dead end" jobs, thenceforth considered "women's work". The increase inthe numbers of married women enployed outside the home in the twentieth century, had less to dowith the mechanization of housework and an increase in leisure time for these women than it didwith their own economic necessity and with high marriage rates that shrank the available pool ofsingle women worke, previously, in many cases, the only women employers would hire.
Women's work has changed considerably in the past 200 years, moving from the household tothe ofiice or the factory, and later becoming mostly white-collar instead of blue-collar work. Fundamentally, however, the conditions under which women work have changed little since the Industrial Revolution: the segregation of occupatious by gender, lower pay for women as a group,jobs that require relatively low levels of skill and offer women little opportunity for advancement all persist, while women's household labour remains demanding. Recent historical investigation has led to a major revision of the notion that lec.hnology is always inherently revolutionary in its effectson society. Mechanization may even have slowed any change in the traditional position of womeu both in the labour market and in the home.
What is the main idea of the first paragraph?
查看材料
It is frequently assumed that the mechanization of work has a revolutionary effect on the livesof the people who operate the new machines and on the society into which the machines have beenintroduced. For example, it has been suggested that the employment of women in industry takethem out of the. household, their traditional sphere and fundamentally alter their position in society.In the nineteenth century, when women began to enter factories, Jules Simon, a French politician,warned that by doing so, women would give up their femininity. Fredrich Engels, however,predicted that women would be liberated from the"social, legal, and economic subordination" ofthe family by technological developments that made possible the recruitment of "the whole femalesex .., into public industry." Observers thus differed concerning the social desirability ofmechanization's effects, but thev agreed that it would trmsiorm women's lives.
Historians, particularly thnse investigating the history of women, now seriously question thisassumption of transforming power. They conclude that such dramatic technological innovations asthe spinning jenny, the sewing tnachine, the typewriter, and the vacuum cleaner have not resultedin equally dramatic social changes in women's economic position or in the prevailing evaluation ofwomen's work. The employment of young women in textile mills during the Industrial Revolutionwas largely and extension of an older pattern of employment for young, single women as domestics.It was not the change in office technology, but rather the separation of secretarial work, previouslyseen as an apprenticeship for beginning managers, from administrative work that in the 1880'screated a new class of "dead end" jobs, thenceforth considered "women's work". The increase inthe numbers of married women enployed outside the home in the twentieth century, had less to dowith the mechanization of housework and an increase in leisure time for these women than it didwith their own economic necessity and with high marriage rates that shrank the available pool ofsingle women worke, previously, in many cases, the only women employers would hire.
Women's work has changed considerably in the past 200 years, moving from the household tothe ofiice or the factory, and later becoming mostly white-collar instead of blue-collar work. Fundamentally, however, the conditions under which women work have changed little since the Industrial Revolution: the segregation of occupatious by gender, lower pay for women as a group,jobs that require relatively low levels of skill and offer women little opportunity for advancement all persist, while women's household labour remains demanding. Recent historical investigation has led to a major revision of the notion that lec.hnology is always inherently revolutionary in its effectson society. Mechanization may even have slowed any change in the traditional position of womeu both in the labour market and in the home.
What is the main idea of the first paragraph?
查看材料
A.The mechanization of work has a revolutionary eftct.
B.The social mechanization would "aftct women's lives.
C.The social status of women has changed.
D.Observers have different ideas about the effect of social mechanizatiou.
B.The social mechanization would "aftct women's lives.
C.The social status of women has changed.
D.Observers have different ideas about the effect of social mechanizatiou.
参考解析
解析:第一段讲到,普遍认为:劳动的机械化对操作机器的人以及引进机器的社会都有革命性的影响。工业中雇佣妇女使她们从家务这样的传统领域中解放出来,并且从根本上改善了她们在社会上的地位。接着讲到,观察者关于社会机械化对妇女的影响持有不同观点,但他们一致认为这必将改变妇女们的生活。由此可知,第一段主要讲了社会机械化对妇女的影响,B项符合。
相关考题:
阅读下面一首诗,完成21—22题。(共4分)饮酒(其五)陶渊明结庐在人境,而无车马喧。问君何能尔?心远地自偏。采菊东篱下,悠然见南山。山气日夕佳,飞鸟相与还。此中有真意,欲辨已忘言。21.请从炼字角度说说“采菊东篱下,悠然见南山”妙在何处。(2分)
阅读以下说明和c++码,将应填入(n)处的字名写在的对应栏内。[说明] 以下函数完成求表达式的值,请填空使之完成此功能。float sum ( float x ){ float s=0.0;int sign = 1;(1);for(inti=1;(2); i+ +){t=t*x;s=s+(3);sign = - sign;(4);}
请仔细阅读以下程序并完成要求。 If((a>2&&b4|| d 请仔细阅读以下程序并完成要求。If((a>2&&b<3)&&(c>4|| d<5)){Flag=1;}Else{Flag=0;)请分别按照语句覆盖、判定覆盖、条件覆盖、判定/条件覆盖测试用例。
三、阅读理解:共15题。每道题包含一段短文,短文后面是一个不完整的陈述,要求你从四个选项中选出一项来完成这一陈述。注意:供选择的答案有时可能是短文内容的一个复述,有时则满足了陈述中其他方面的要求,你的选择应与所要求最相符合。请开始答题:31.有些基因使人们总的来说感到快乐一些或者悲伤一些。这句话的意思是:A.总的来说,有些基因使人感到快乐,有些基因使人感到悲伤B.有些基因总的来说使人们要么感到快乐,要么感到悲伤C.有些基因总的来说使人们既感到快乐,又感到悲伤D.总的来说,使人感到快乐和悲伤的原因是部分基因的影响
二、阅读下面短文,从短文后各题所给四个选项(A、B、C、D)中选出能填入相应空白处的最佳选项。共3题,每题1分,共3分。 阅读下面短文,回答从的 114~116 题目。Martin Luther King Jr.was born in Georgia in 1 929.When was still a boy Martin learned that his people,the black Americans,when often treated differently from most of( )fellow Americans.Many could not attend good schools,get good jobs,or live in nice houses because of the color of their ( ) .Manin knew that in a free country this was wrong.He wanted to help his black brothers,( )he decided to go to school and become a minister.第114题:( )A.hisB.thoseC.mostD.their
请认真阅读下列材料,并按要求作答。请根据上述材料完成下列任务:(1)在小学英语教学中,呈现演示的原则有哪些?(2)请根据教学内容确定本课时的教学目标。(3)请设计本节“句型课”的新知呈现环节并说明设计意图。
问答题研究者想探讨这样一个问题:文章的生字密度对学生阅读理解成绩的影响。研究者感兴趣四种生字密度:1:5、1:10、1:15、1:20。 被试:采用随机取样的方法选取被试40人,男性20人,女性20人。视力或矫正视力正常。平均年龄为14.5岁。 材料:选取历史方面的四篇短文(1:5、1:10、1:15、1:20),这四篇短文除了生字密度不同外,在文章的长度、语法的难度上均进行了匹配。每个学生要阅读四篇短文中的每一篇,四篇短文的阅读顺序进行了随机化平衡处理。分析这个实验的自变量、因变量,以及此实验采用什么类型的实验设计(被试间设计还是被试内设计)。
问答题作文提示: 阅读下面一段话后,请谈谈你的看法。(字数:150字左右) 身处他乡,没有朋友,没有亲人在身边时,想家、寂寞便会如影随形。寂寞是每个人都会遇到的情况,寂寞的时候,你如何排遣?如何战胜它?请以“战胜寂寞”为题,写一篇短文。