单选题The Immigration and Naturalization Service is concerned with which document on a vessel making preliminary entry into a U.S. port from a foreign port?（）.ACargo ManifestBCertified Crew ListCCurio ListDShipping Articles
单选题
The Immigration and Naturalization Service is concerned with which document on a vessel making preliminary entry into a U.S. port from a foreign port?（）.
A
Cargo Manifest
B
Certified Crew List
C
Curio List
D
Shipping Articles
参考解析
解析：
暂无解析
相关考题：
Purser presents all the seaman’s books to the ________A.PilotB.Customs OfficerC.Immigration OfficerD.Agent
the () is primarily concerned with acceptance of the deliverables.while quality control is primarily concerned with correctness of the deliverables and meeting the quality requirements specified for the deliverablesA.verify scopeB.define scopeC.quality assuranceD.validate scope
All masters， owners and agents ________ that vessels when requesting Immigration and Port Health Clearance must anchor at the designated Immigration and Quarantine Anchorage and exhibit the appropriate signals．A.remindB.is remindedC.are remindedD.to remind
The Immigration and Naturalization Service is concerned with which document on a vessel making preliminary entry into a U.S. port from a foreign port? ______.A.Cargo ManifestB.Certified Crew ListC.Curio ListD.Shipping Articles
On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to“establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately“occupied the field”and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as“a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect,the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?A.Federal officers’duty to withhold immigrants’information.B.States’independence from federal immigration law.C.States’legitimate role in immigration enforcement.D.Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.
On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to“establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately“occupied the field”and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as“a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect,the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.What can be learned from the last paragraph?A.Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.B.Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.C.Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.D.The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.
On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to“establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately“occupied the field”and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as“a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect,the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because theyA.deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.B.disturbed the power balance between different states.C.overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.D.contradicted both the federal and state policies.
（）is a discipline within the information technology and information systems domain and is concerned with making the planning process for information technology investments and decision-making a quicker，more flexible，and more thoroughly aligned process. A. Information technology planning B. Service monitor managementC. Service designD. Information technology audit
The（)process differs from the（)process in that the former is primarily concerned with acceptance of the deliverables,while the latter is primarily concerned with acceptance of the deliverables,while the latter is primarily concerned with correctness of the deliverables.A.perform Quality AssuranceB.Validate ScopeC.Control QualityD.Define Scope
On which of the following did the Justices agree，according to Paragraph 4？( ) A.Federal officers’duty to withhold immigrants’information. B.States’independence from federal immigration law. C.States’legitimate role in immigration enforcement. D.Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.
What can be learned from Paragraph 7？( ) A.Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress B.Justices intended to check the power of the Administration C.Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress D.The Administration is dominant over immigration issues
On which of the following did the Justices agree，according to Paragraph 4？( ) A.Federal officers’duty to withhold immigrants’information B.States’independence from federal immigration law C.States’legitimate role in immigration enforcement D.Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement
What can be learned from Paragraph 7？( ) A.Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress. B.Justices intended to check the power of the Administration. C.Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress. D.The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.
Northern Ireland is small,but it is significant because of the（）A、the economic problemsB、the political troublesC、the immigration issuesD、the national identity
通过bindService（）启动service，如果service还未启动，后有什么操作？当调用者退出，service会有什么操作？（）A、service启动失败，service不终止B、service启动，service终止C、service启动失败，service终止D、service启动，service不终止
The pSeries technical specialist is concerned that the installed inventory for a p670 does not match what the customer says is installed. The specialist discovers that the customer has never updated their VPD. Which of the following HMC applications is used to gather the current VPD information？（）A、Service ProcessorB、Service DirectorC、Inventory Scout ServicesD、Service Focal Point
单选题Not until the 1980’s ______ in Beijing start to find ways to preserve historic buildings from destruction.Asome concerned citizensBsome concerning citizensCdid some concerning citizensDdid some concerned citizens
单选题The author’s proposal differs from the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1990 in ______.Athe kind of green card.Bthe amount of investment capital.Cthe budget for the whole process.Dthe certainty of issuing green cards.
单选题Northern Ireland is small,but it is significant because of the（）Athe economic problemsBthe political troublesCthe immigration issuesDthe national identity
单选题A new customer wants to install a Power 750 in a warehouse location that has no local staff to support it. They are concerned about hardware support and would like to have the system notify IBM service if there is an issue.Which actions will address the customer concern?（）AEnable automatic problem reporting from smitBUse IVM to enable console mirroring to IBM Remote Support.CUse the HMC to enable reporting through Electronic Service Agent.DEnable Automatic Problem Reporting in ASMI using he embedded modem on the FSP.
单选题All masters，owners and agents（）that vessels when requesting Immigration and Port Health Clearance must anchor at the designated Immigration and Quarantine Anchorage and exhibit the appropriate signals.AremindBis remindedCare remindedDto remind
问答题Say something about the three immigration waves.