Attention is called to the fact that in many cases charted depths may be decreased by up to ______.A.one nautical mileB.two kilometersC.5 cables onlyD.one fathom
Attention is called to the fact that in many cases charted depths may be decreased by up to ______.
A.one nautical mile
B.two kilometers
C.5 cables only
D.one fathom
相关考题：
A child with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder may have symptom of( ) . A、Attention difficultiesB、Be over-activeC、Eating disordersD、Impulsiveness
－ Hello, Sally. What’s the matter with you You look worried. －() A、What shall I do if a customer doesn’t pay up on the due dateB、Yeah, that’s true. It requires great attention.C、Don’t mention it.
The driver had fled, careless of _______ essential to save the victim's life.A. medical attention might beB. medical attention might well beC. that medical attention might beD. the fact that medical attention might be
Many of our most deeply ______ opinions are held simply as a result of the fact that we happen to have been “brought up”to them.A: rootedB: rootC: rootingD: roots
On small scale charts of ocean areas where hydrographic information is，in many cases，still sparse，charted shoals may be in error as regards______．A.positionB.position，depth and extentC.depth and extentD.position and extent
The short time schedule may be a big problem, but there are many other things we can do to catch up. (翻译)
At the conference they brought up many problems, such as soaring housing prices and the homeless, which aroused great attention from the delegates present.()
Mr. Russell said Richard had nothing to do with the agreement mentioned because ________.A. Richard didn't want to pay money he owed Ms. LewisB. this may affect the trialC. this may ruin Richard's reputationD. he knew that was the fact
Charted depths ________by 2 meters due to state of the winds.A.is decreasedB.decreasedC.decreasesD.are decreasd
Passage 1In his book The Tipping Point,Malcolm Gladwell argues that"social epidemics"are driven in?large part by the actions of a tiny minority of special individuals,often called influentials,who are?unusually informed,persuasive,or well-connected．The idea is intuitively compelling,but it doesn′t?explain how ideas actually spread．The supposed importance of influentials derives from a plausible-sounding but largely untested?theory called the"two-step flow of communication":Information flows from the media to the?influentials and from them to everyone else．Marketers have embraced the two-step flow because it?suggests that if they can just find and influence the influentials,those selected people will do most of?the work for them．The theory also seems to explain the sudden and unexpected popularity of certain?looks,brands,or neighborhoods．In many such cases,a cursory search for causes finds that some?small group of people was wearing,promoting,or developing whatever it is before anyone else paid?attention．Anecdotal evidence of this kind fits nicely with the idea that only certain special people?can drive trends．In their recent work,however,some researchers have come up with the finding that influentials?have far less impact on social epidemics than is generally supposed．In fact,they don′t seem to be?required of all．The researchers′argument stems from a simple observation about social influence:With the?exception of a few celebrities like Oprah Winfrey--whose outsize presence is primarily a function of?media,not interpersonal,influence--even the most influential members of a population simply don′t?interact with that many others．Yet it is precisely these non-celebrity influentials who,according to?the two-step-flow theory,are supposed to drive social epidemics,by influencing their friends and?colleagues directly．For a social epidemic to occur,however,each person so affected must then?influence his or her own acquaintances,who must in turn influence theirs,and so on;and just how?many others pay attention to each of these people has little to do with the initial influential．If people?in the network just two degrees removed from the initial influential prove resistant,for example,the?cascade of change won′t propagate very far or affect many people．Building on the basic truth about interpersonal influence,the researchers studied the dynamics?of social influence by conducting thousands of computer simulations of populations,manipulating a?number of variables relating to people′s ability to influence others and their tendency to be?influenced．They found that the principal requirement for what is called"global cascades"—the?widespread propagation of influence through networks--is the presence not of a few influentials but,rather,of a critical mass of easily influenced people．What the researchers have observed recently shows that__________．查看材料A.the power of influence goes with social interactionsB.interpersonal links can be enhanced through the mediaC.influentials have more channels to reach the publicD.most celebrities enjoy wide media attention
Passage 1In his book The Tipping Point,Malcolm Gladwell argues that"social epidemics"are driven in?large part by the actions of a tiny minority of special individuals,often called influentials,who are?unusually informed,persuasive,or well-connected．The idea is intuitively compelling,but it doesn′t?explain how ideas actually spread．The supposed importance of influentials derives from a plausible-sounding but largely untested?theory called the"two-step flow of communication":Information flows from the media to the?influentials and from them to everyone else．Marketers have embraced the two-step flow because it?suggests that if they can just find and influence the influentials,those selected people will do most of?the work for them．The theory also seems to explain the sudden and unexpected popularity of certain?looks,brands,or neighborhoods．In many such cases,a cursory search for causes finds that some?small group of people was wearing,promoting,or developing whatever it is before anyone else paid?attention．Anecdotal evidence of this kind fits nicely with the idea that only certain special people?can drive trends．In their recent work,however,some researchers have come up with the finding that influentials?have far less impact on social epidemics than is generally supposed．In fact,they don′t seem to be?required of all．The researchers′argument stems from a simple observation about social influence:With the?exception of a few celebrities like Oprah Winfrey--whose outsize presence is primarily a function of?media,not interpersonal,influence--even the most influential members of a population simply don′t?interact with that many others．Yet it is precisely these non-celebrity influentials who,according to?the two-step-flow theory,are supposed to drive social epidemics,by influencing their friends and?colleagues directly．For a social epidemic to occur,however,each person so affected must then?influence his or her own acquaintances,who must in turn influence theirs,and so on;and just how?many others pay attention to each of these people has little to do with the initial influential．If people?in the network just two degrees removed from the initial influential prove resistant,for example,the?cascade of change won′t propagate very far or affect many people．Building on the basic truth about interpersonal influence,the researchers studied the dynamics?of social influence by conducting thousands of computer simulations of populations,manipulating a?number of variables relating to people′s ability to influence others and their tendency to be?influenced．They found that the principal requirement for what is called"global cascades"—the?widespread propagation of influence through networks--is the presence not of a few influentials but,rather,of a critical mass of easily influenced people．The underlined phrase"these people"in Paragraph 4 refers to the ones who__________．查看材料A.stay outside the network of social influenceB.have little contact with the source of influenceC.are influenced and then influence othersD.are influenced by the initial influential
Text 3 In his book The Tipping Point,Malcolm Gladwell argues that social epidemics are driven in large part by the acting of a tiny minority of special individuals,often called influentials,who are unusually informed,persuasive,or well-connected.The idea is intuitively compelling,but it doesn't explain how ideas actually spread.The supposed importance of influentials derives from a plausible sounding but largely untested theory called the"two step flow of communication":Information flows from the media to the influentials and from them to everyone else.Marketers have embraced the two-step flow because it suggests that if they can just find and influence the influentials,those selected people will do most of the work for them.The theory also seems to explain the sudden and unexpected popularity of certain looks,brands,or neighborhoods.In many such cases,a cursory search for causes finds that some small group of people was wearing,promoting,or developing whatever it is before anyone else paid attention.Anecdotal evidence of this kind fits nicely with the idea that only certain special people can drive trends In their recent work,however,some researchers have come up with the finding that influentials have far less impact on social epidemics than is generally supposed.In fact,they don't seem to be required of all.The researchers'argument stems from a simple observing about social influence,with the exception of a few celebrities like Oprah Winfrey—whose outsize presence is primarily a function of media,not interpersonal,influence—even the most influential members of a population simply don't interact with that many others.Yet it is precisely these non-celebrity influentials who,according to the two-step-flow theory,are supposed to drive social epidemics by influencing their friends and colleagues directly.For a social epidemic to occur,however,each person so affected,must then influence his or her own acquaintances,who must in turn influence theirs,and so on;and just how many others pay attention to each of these people has little to do with the initial influential.If people in the network just two degrees removed from the initial influential prove resistant,for example,the cascade of change won't propagate very far or affect many people.Building on the basic truth about interpersonal influence,the researchers studied the dynamics of populations manipulating a number of variables relating of populations,manipulating a number of variables relating to people's ability to influence others and their tendency to be influenced.Our work shows that the principal requirement for what we call"global cascades"–the widespread propagation of influence through networks–is the presence not of a few influentials but,rather,of a critical mass of easily influenced people.35.what is the essential element in the dynamics of social influence?A.The eagerness to be acceptedB.The impulse to influence othersC.The readiness to be influencedD.The inclination to rely on others
Text 3 In his book The Tipping Point,Malcolm Gladwell argues that social epidemics are driven in large part by the acting of a tiny minority of special individuals,often called influentials,who are unusually informed,persuasive,or well-connected.The idea is intuitively compelling,but it doesn't explain how ideas actually spread.The supposed importance of influentials derives from a plausible sounding but largely untested theory called the"two step flow of communication":Information flows from the media to the influentials and from them to everyone else.Marketers have embraced the two-step flow because it suggests that if they can just find and influence the influentials,those selected people will do most of the work for them.The theory also seems to explain the sudden and unexpected popularity of certain looks,brands,or neighborhoods.In many such cases,a cursory search for causes finds that some small group of people was wearing,promoting,or developing whatever it is before anyone else paid attention.Anecdotal evidence of this kind fits nicely with the idea that only certain special people can drive trends In their recent work,however,some researchers have come up with the finding that influentials have far less impact on social epidemics than is generally supposed.In fact,they don't seem to be required of all.The researchers'argument stems from a simple observing about social influence,with the exception of a few celebrities like Oprah Winfrey—whose outsize presence is primarily a function of media,not interpersonal,influence—even the most influential members of a population simply don't interact with that many others.Yet it is precisely these non-celebrity influentials who,according to the two-step-flow theory,are supposed to drive social epidemics by influencing their friends and colleagues directly.For a social epidemic to occur,however,each person so affected,must then influence his or her own acquaintances,who must in turn influence theirs,and so on;and just how many others pay attention to each of these people has little to do with the initial influential.If people in the network just two degrees removed from the initial influential prove resistant,for example,the cascade of change won't propagate very far or affect many people.Building on the basic truth about interpersonal influence,the researchers studied the dynamics of populations manipulating a number of variables relating of populations,manipulating a number of variables relating to people's ability to influence others and their tendency to be influenced.Our work shows that the principal requirement for what we call"global cascades"–the widespread propagation of influence through networks–is the presence not of a few influentials but,rather,of a critical mass of easily influenced people.33.What the researchers have observed recently shows thatA.the power of influence goes with social interactionsB.interpersonal links can be enhanced through the mediaC.influentials have more channels to reach the publicD.most celebrities enjoy wide media attention
I really can't put up with him,especially his so-called refined way of speaking and behavior.A:honest B:elegant C:blunt D:straightforward
The fact is that _____ is given to seniority and many people would rather be the tail of a lion than the head of a dog.A.priorityB.focusC.emphasisD.attention
In a world where it seems we already have too much to do，and too many things to think about，it seems the last thing we need is something new that we have to learn.But use cases do solve a problem with requirements:with（ ）declarative equirements it's hard to describle steps and sequences of events.Use cases，stated simply，allow description of sequences of events that，taken together，lead to a system doing something useful.As simple as this sounds，this is important.When confronted only with a pile of requiements，it's often（ ）to make sense of what the authors of the requirements really wanted the system to do.In the preceding example，use cases reduce the ambiguity of the requirements by specifying exactly when and under what conditions certain behavior occurs;as such，the sequence of the behaviors can be regarded as a requirement.Use cases are particularly well suited to capture approaches.Although this may sound simple，the fact is that（ ）equirement capture approaches，with their emphasis on declarative requirements and"shall"statements，completely fail to capture the（ ）of the system's behavior.Use cases are a simple yet powerful way to express the behavior of the system in way that all stakeholders can easily understand.But，like anything，use cases come with their own problems，and as useful as they are，they can be（请作答此空）.the result is something that is as bad，if not worse，that the original problem.Therein it's important to utilize use cases effectively without creating a greater problem than the one you started with.A.misappliedB.appliedC.usedD.powerful
材料题CWill it matter if you don’t take your breakfast Recently a test was given in the United States．Those tested included people of different ages,from 12 to 83．During the experiment,these people were given all kinds of breakfasts and sometimes they got no breakfast at all．Special tests were set up to see how well their bodies worked when they had eaten a certain kind of breakfast．The results sow that if a person eats a proper breakfast,he or she will work with better effect(影响)than if he or she has no breakfast．This fact appears to be especially true if a person works with his brains．If a student eats fruit,eggs,bread and milk before going to school,he will learn more quickly and listen with more attention in class．Contrary to(与……相反)what many people believe,if you don’t eat breakfast,you will not lose weight．This is because people become so hungry at noon that they eat too much for lunch,and end up gaining weight instead of losing．You will probably lose more weight if you reduce(减少)your other meals．Which of the following is not true to the passage A.Poor breakfasts affect(影响)those who work with brainB.Morning diet may cause one to get fatteC.Reducing lunch and supper is of less value in weight-losinD.Eating less in lunch and supper may help to lose weigh
单选题Attention is called to the fact that in many cases pipelines are not （） and charted depths may be decreased by up to 2 meters．AconcealedBburiedCexistedDbuilt
单选题Attention is called to the fact in many cases pipelines are not buried and charted depth may be decreased（）up to teo meters.AwithBbyConDin
单选题A line of position formed by sighting two charted objects in line is called a(n)（）.Arelative bearingBrange lineCtrack lineDestimated position
单选题When using a buoy as an aid to navigation which of the following should be considered?（）AThe buoy should be considered to always be in the charted locationBIf the light is flashing，the buoy should be considered to be in the charted locationCThe buoy may not be in the charted positionDThe buoy should be considered to be in the charted position if it has been freshly painted
单选题Charted depths（）by 2 meters due to state of the winds．Ais decreasedBdecreasedCdecreasesDare decreased
单选题Leg penetration to depths which require pullout forces greater than that which can be supplied by the buoyancy of the hull may exist in（）.Asoft mudBsandCsiltDsoft to firm clays
单选题Attention is called to the fact that in many cases charted depths may be decreased by up to （）.Aone nautical mileBtwo kilometersC5 cables onlyDone fathom
单选题Charted depths are decreased（）2 meters.AinBonCwithDby