法律体系（legal system）
法律体系（legal system）
相关考题：
You are the administrator of a Windows 2000 network. You need to store secured files for your company's accounting and legal departments on a Windows 2000 Professional computer.You want to accomplish the following goals:1. Enable users in both departments to access their own files from the network2. Enable users in the accounting department to view the legal accounting department's documents3. Prevent users in the legal department from being able to view the accounting department's documents4. Enable managers within the company to access and modify both the accounting and the legal department's filesYou take the following actions:1. Create two shared folders named Accounting and Legal2. Create three groups named Accounting, Legal, and Management3. Allow the Accounting group modify permission on the Accounting folder4. Allow the Legal group modify permission on the Legal folders.5. Allow the Management group modify permission on both the Accounting and Legal folders.Which result or results do these actions produce? (Choose all that apply)A．Users in both departments can access to their own files from the network.B．Users in the accounting department can view the legal department's documents.C．Users in the legal department cannot view the accounting department's documents.D．Company managers can access and modify both departments' files.
What is an example of the term "Restraint of Rulers，Princes，or Peoples" in a marine insurance policy?A.A prohibition from loading a cargo from a country when the cargo may be a carrier of infectious diseasesB.Arrest of a vessel by legal authorities to satisfy claims through exercise of a maritime lienC.Damage caused by riot of the population of a portD.Losses caused by fines from polluting the harbor after malfunction of a piping system
Lawyers protesting about cuts don't attract the same level of public support as doctors and nurses.What goes on in the courts is not widely understood,and most people do not expect to neecl a publicly funded lawyer in the way that they rely on hospitals.Nevertheless,access to justice is a fundamental democratic right,and the chaos and failure unfolding across the legal system as the result of cuts should concern everyone who cares about justice.Research carried out by civil servants and published in May after it was leaked shows that the disruptive effect of legal aid cuts in England and Wales has spread from the civil courts to the criminal courts:where increasing numbers of clefendants are appearing without legal advice or representation,as a consequence of changes including new means tests.More than half of juclges questioned for the study voiced concerns about defendants not understanding that a guilty plea could lead to a reducecl sentence.The government knows there is a problem.not least because the王950m reduction in the legal aid bill in 2016,compared with 2010,was more than twice as much as it expected.But ministers have already clelayed far too long in the face of clear evidence that cuts in the family courts have been harmful.Official figures show that the proportion of plaintif{s and defendants with legal representation fell from 60%in 2012 t0 33%in the first quarter of last year,and it is not uncommon for one party in a civil case to be represented by a lawyer while the other is not.Some sensible changes have already been suggested in a review commissioned by the Labour party last year.These include a loosening of the criteria for legal aid eligibility to include all cases involving children,and representation for families in inquests where the state is already funding one party such as the police-which represents an essential rebalancing of justice's scales.The report also made the not unreasonable suggestion that law should be taught in schools.Avoiding costly lawsuits by encouraging people to treat court as a last resort sounds reasonable,and some of the consequences of the cuts were no doubt unintended.But the"simpler"and"more responsive"system promised by the Conservative justice secretary Ken Clarke when embarking on these cost-saving measures in 2010 now looks like wishful thinking at best.The current justice secretary,David Gauke,must act to restore confidence in a damaged system.Legal aid began in the UK in the 1940s with the rest of the welfare state.In the US,a defendant's entittement to a lawyer in a criminal case is enshrined in an amendment to the constitution.While the rules in the UK may lack this constitutional underpinning,people are still entitled to access to justice-including lawyers paid for with legal aid.OfficiaJ research and figures in Paragraphs 2 and 3 reveal an increase inA.lawsuit participants lacking a lawyer.B.both civil and criminal cases.C.appeals for sentence reduction.D.guilty pleas to criminal charges.
Lawyers protesting about cuts don't attract the same level of public support as doctors and nurses.What goes on in the courts is not widely understood,and most people do not expect to neecl a publicly funded lawyer in the way that they rely on hospitals.Nevertheless,access to justice is a fundamental democratic right,and the chaos and failure unfolding across the legal system as the result of cuts should concern everyone who cares about justice.Research carried out by civil servants and published in May after it was leaked shows that the disruptive effect of legal aid cuts in England and Wales has spread from the civil courts to the criminal courts:where increasing numbers of clefendants are appearing without legal advice or representation,as a consequence of changes including new means tests.More than half of juclges questioned for the study voiced concerns about defendants not understanding that a guilty plea could lead to a reducecl sentence.The government knows there is a problem.not least because the王950m reduction in the legal aid bill in 2016,compared with 2010,was more than twice as much as it expected.But ministers have already clelayed far too long in the face of clear evidence that cuts in the family courts have been harmful.Official figures show that the proportion of plaintif{s and defendants with legal representation fell from 60%in 2012 t0 33%in the first quarter of last year,and it is not uncommon for one party in a civil case to be represented by a lawyer while the other is not.Some sensible changes have already been suggested in a review commissioned by the Labour party last year.These include a loosening of the criteria for legal aid eligibility to include all cases involving children,and representation for families in inquests where the state is already funding one party such as the police-which represents an essential rebalancing of justice's scales.The report also made the not unreasonable suggestion that law should be taught in schools.Avoiding costly lawsuits by encouraging people to treat court as a last resort sounds reasonable,and some of the consequences of the cuts were no doubt unintended.But the"simpler"and"more responsive"system promised by the Conservative justice secretary Ken Clarke when embarking on these cost-saving measures in 2010 now looks like wishful thinking at best.The current justice secretary,David Gauke,must act to restore confidence in a damaged system.Legal aid began in the UK in the 1940s with the rest of the welfare state.In the US,a defendant's entittement to a lawyer in a criminal case is enshrined in an amendment to the constitution.While the rules in the UK may lack this constitutional underpinning,people are still entitled to access to justice-including lawyers paid for with legal aid.One of the Labour party's suggestions to address the legal aid problem isA.canceling court costs for poor families.B.reducing annual funding for the police.C.ensuring all children's access to legal aid.D.enhancing teachers'legal awareness.
Lawyers protesting about cuts don't attract the same level of public support as doctors and nurses.What goes on in the courts is not widely understood,and most people do not expect to neecl a publicly funded lawyer in the way that they rely on hospitals.Nevertheless,access to justice is a fundamental democratic right,and the chaos and failure unfolding across the legal system as the result of cuts should concern everyone who cares about justice.Research carried out by civil servants and published in May after it was leaked shows that the disruptive effect of legal aid cuts in England and Wales has spread from the civil courts to the criminal courts:where increasing numbers of clefendants are appearing without legal advice or representation,as a consequence of changes including new means tests.More than half of juclges questioned for the study voiced concerns about defendants not understanding that a guilty plea could lead to a reducecl sentence.The government knows there is a problem.not least because the王950m reduction in the legal aid bill in 2016,compared with 2010,was more than twice as much as it expected.But ministers have already clelayed far too long in the face of clear evidence that cuts in the family courts have been harmful.Official figures show that the proportion of plaintif{s and defendants with legal representation fell from 60%in 2012 t0 33%in the first quarter of last year,and it is not uncommon for one party in a civil case to be represented by a lawyer while the other is not.Some sensible changes have already been suggested in a review commissioned by the Labour party last year.These include a loosening of the criteria for legal aid eligibility to include all cases involving children,and representation for families in inquests where the state is already funding one party such as the police-which represents an essential rebalancing of justice's scales.The report also made the not unreasonable suggestion that law should be taught in schools.Avoiding costly lawsuits by encouraging people to treat court as a last resort sounds reasonable,and some of the consequences of the cuts were no doubt unintended.But the"simpler"and"more responsive"system promised by the Conservative justice secretary Ken Clarke when embarking on these cost-saving measures in 2010 now looks like wishful thinking at best.The current justice secretary,David Gauke,must act to restore confidence in a damaged system.Legal aid began in the UK in the 1940s with the rest of the welfare state.In the US,a defendant's entittement to a lawyer in a criminal case is enshrined in an amendment to the constitution.While the rules in the UK may lack this constitutional underpinning,people are still entitled to access to justice-including lawyers paid for with legal aid.The author views the system promised by Ken Clarke withA.confidence.B.uncertainty.C.tolerance.D.criticism.
Lawyers protesting about cuts don't attract the same level of public support as doctors and nurses.What goes on in the courts is not widely understood,and most people do not expect to neecl a publicly funded lawyer in the way that they rely on hospitals.Nevertheless,access to justice is a fundamental democratic right,and the chaos and failure unfolding across the legal system as the result of cuts should concern everyone who cares about justice.Research carried out by civil servants and published in May after it was leaked shows that the disruptive effect of legal aid cuts in England and Wales has spread from the civil courts to the criminal courts:where increasing numbers of clefendants are appearing without legal advice or representation,as a consequence of changes including new means tests.More than half of juclges questioned for the study voiced concerns about defendants not understanding that a guilty plea could lead to a reducecl sentence.The government knows there is a problem.not least because the王950m reduction in the legal aid bill in 2016,compared with 2010,was more than twice as much as it expected.But ministers have already clelayed far too long in the face of clear evidence that cuts in the family courts have been harmful.Official figures show that the proportion of plaintif{s and defendants with legal representation fell from 60%in 2012 t0 33%in the first quarter of last year,and it is not uncommon for one party in a civil case to be represented by a lawyer while the other is not.Some sensible changes have already been suggested in a review commissioned by the Labour party last year.These include a loosening of the criteria for legal aid eligibility to include all cases involving children,and representation for families in inquests where the state is already funding one party such as the police-which represents an essential rebalancing of justice's scales.The report also made the not unreasonable suggestion that law should be taught in schools.Avoiding costly lawsuits by encouraging people to treat court as a last resort sounds reasonable,and some of the consequences of the cuts were no doubt unintended.But the"simpler"and"more responsive"system promised by the Conservative justice secretary Ken Clarke when embarking on these cost-saving measures in 2010 now looks like wishful thinking at best.The current justice secretary,David Gauke,must act to restore confidence in a damaged system.Legal aid began in the UK in the 1940s with the rest of the welfare state.In the US,a defendant's entittement to a lawyer in a criminal case is enshrined in an amendment to the constitution.While the rules in the UK may lack this constitutional underpinning,people are still entitled to access to justice-including lawyers paid for with legal aid.Legal aid cuts fail to raise much public concerns partly becauseA.unlike doctors,lawyers have a bad reputation.B.most people lack enough legal knowledge.C.lawyers'protests are less reported by the media.D.the chaotic legal system is totally disappointing.
Which of the following statements is NOT true?（）AAlfred the Great started the English navy.BAlfred the Great reorganized the Saxon any,making it more efficient.CAlfred the Great established schools and formulated a legal System.DAlfred the Great impose a tax,called the Danegeld,on the Saxons.
Which of the following is the MOST important data retention consideration when creating a backup system？（）A、Utilizing disk-to-disk clustering and hot site replicationB、If the GFS backup system will cover all potential data breachesC、The process to move the data backup to an offsite locationD、The individual laws and legal requirements of the data
In terms of information literacy， an information literate student is able to（）A、determine the nature and extent of the information needed and access needed information effectively and efficiently.B、evaluate information and its sources critically and incorporate selected information into his or her knowledge base and value system.C、use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose individually or as a member of a group.D、understand many of the economic，legal，and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and use information ethically and legally.
Identify three correct statements of a multi-org setup. （）(Choose three.)A、A Government Reporting Entity (GRE)/Legal Entity can point to one and only one Set of Books.B、Inventory Orgs can be associated directly with a GRE/Legal Entity.C、The creation of a Master Inventory organization is mandatory.D、One and only one Operating Unit can be associated with a GRE/Legal Entity.E、One Set of Books can have one or many GRE's/Legal Entities associated with it.
You need to recommend a solution to minimize the amount of time it takes for the legal department users to locate files in the Legal share. What should you include in the recommendation？（）A、File Server Resource Manager （FSRM）B、Print and Document ServicesC、Services for Network File System （NFS）D、Windows Search Service
You are the administrator of a Windows 2000 network. You need to store secured files for your company’s Accounting and Legal departments on a Windows 2000 Professional computer. You want to accomplish the following goals： • Enable users in both departments to access their own files from the network • Enable users in the Accounting department to view the Legal department’s documents • Prevent users in the Legal department from being able to view the Accounting department’s documents • Enable managers within the company to access and modify both the Accounting and the Legal department’s files You take the following actions： • Create two shared folders named Accounting and Legal • Create three groups named Accounting， Legal， and Management • Allow the Accounting group Modify permission on the Accounting folder • Allow the Accounting group Read permissions on the Legal folders. • Allow the Management group Modify permission on both the Accounting and Legal folders. Which result or results do these actions produce？（）A、Users in both departments can access to their own files from the network.B、Users in the Accounting department can view the Legal department’s documents.C、Users in the Legal department cannot view the Accounting department’s documents.D、Company managers can access and modify both departments’ files.
You are the administrator of ExamSheet's Windows 2000 network. You need to store secured files for ExamSheet's accounting and legal departments on a Windows 2000 Professional computer. You create two shared folders named Accounting and Legal with the default NTFS and share permissions. You also create two groups named Accounting and Legal and add the appropriate user accounts into the appropriate groups. To meet the security requirements for the shared folders the following criteria must be met: 1.Users in both departments must be able to update their own files from the network. 2.Users in the accounting department must be able to view the legal department's documents from the network. 3.Users in the legal department must be prevented from being able to view the accounting department's documents from the network.You want to ensure that all security requirements are met using the least amount of administrative effort. What should you do? （）A、Allow the Accounting groupReadpermission on the Accounting share and the Legal shared folder. Allow the Legal groupReadpermissions on the Legal shared folder.B、Allow the Accounting groupFull Controlpermissions on the Accounting shared folder and the Legal shared folder. Allow the Legal groupFull Controlpermission on the Legal shared folder.C、Deny the Everyone groupFull Controlpermissions on the Accounting shared folder.D、Deny the Legal groupFull Controlpermission on the Accounting shared folder.
Which of the following is the technology that helps organizations to reduce legal risks associated with e-mail？（）A、Information Rights ManagementB、JoumalingC、Legal disclaimerD、Messaging Records Management
单选题Statistics issued in New Jersey suggested that ______.Amany drivers were not of legal ageByoung drivers were often bad driversCthe level of drinking increased in the 1960sDthe legal drinking age should be raised
单选题What is an example of the term Restraint of Rulers，Princes，or Peoples in a marine insurance policy?（）AA prohibition from loading a cargo from a country when the cargo may be a carrier of infectious diseasesBArrest of a vessel by legal authorities to satisfy claims through exercise of a maritime lienCDamage caused by riot of the population of a portDLosses caused by fines from polluting the harbor after malfunction of a piping system
单选题The American chessmaster Paul Morphy contemporary of Abraham Lincoln, and he was also a lawyer who had memorized most of the Louisiana legal code.AMorphy was a contemporary of Abraham Lincoln, and he was also a lawyer who had memorized most of the Louisiana legal codeBMorphy, a contemporary of Abraham Lincoln, was also a lawyer who memorized most of the Louisiana legal codeCMorphy, being a contemporary of Lincoln, was also a lawyer who had memorized most of the Louisiana legal codeDMorphy who was a contemporary of Abraham Lincoln but he was a lawyer who had memorized most of the Louisiana legal code tooEMorphy, a contemporary of Abraham Lincoln, also being a lawyer who had memorized most of the Louisiana legal code5. The causes of the conflict in the remote mountain area is finally becoming clear.
单选题Which of the following statements is NOT true?（）AAlfred the Great started the English navy.BAlfred the Great reorganized the Saxon any,making it more efficient.CAlfred the Great established schools and formulated a legal System.DAlfred the Great impose a tax,called the Danegeld,on the Saxons.
单选题Which of the following is the MOST important data retention consideration when creating a backup system？（）AUtilizing disk-to-disk clustering and hot site replicationBIf the GFS backup system will cover all potential data breachesCThe process to move the data backup to an offsite locationDThe individual laws and legal requirements of the data
单选题As the investigation concludes, the debate over the origins of the scandal, the merits of the federal in vestigation, and the legal authority of the prosecutor have intensified greatly.Athe legal authority of the prosecutor haveBwhether the prosecutor has legal authority hasCthe legal authority of the prosecutor hasDwhat the legal authority of the prosecutor is hasEthe prosecutor’s legal authority have