请阅读短文。Do who choose to go on exotic, far-flung holidays deserve free health advice before they travel? And even if they pay, who ensures that they get good, up-to-date information? Who, for that matter, should collect that information in the first place? For a variety of reasons, travel medicine in Britain is a responsibility nobody wants. As a result, many travellers go abroad prepared to avoid serious disease.Why is travel medicine so unloved? Partly there's an identity problem. Because it takes an interest in anything that impinges on the health of travellers, this emerging medical specialism invariably cuts across the traditional disciplines. It delves into everything from seasickness, jet lag and the hazards of camels to malaria and plague. But travel medicine has a more serious obstacle to overcome. Travel clinics are meant to tell people how to avoid ending up dead or in a hospital when they come home, but it is notoriously difficult to get anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy.Travel medicine has also been colonized by commercial interests; the vast majority of travel clinics in Britain are run by airlines or travel companies. And while travel concerns are happy to sell profitable injections, they may be less keen to spread bad news about travellers' diarrhea in Turkey, or to take time to spell out preventive measures travellers could take."The NHS finds it difficult to define travellers' health, says Ron Behrens, the only NHS consultant in travel and director of the travel clinic of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in London." Should it come within the NHS or should it be paid for? It's Gary area, and opinion is spilt. No one seems to have any responsibility for defining its role, he says.To compound its low status in the medical hierarchy, travel medicine has to rely on statistics that are patchy at best. In most cases we just don't know how many Britons contract diseases when abroad. And even if a disease linked to travel there is rarely any information about where those afflicted went, what they are, how they behaved, or which vaccinations they had. This shortage of hard facts and figures makes it difficult to give detailed advice to people, information that might even save their lives.A recent leader in British Medical Journal argued. "Travel medicine will emerge as credible disciplines only if the risks encountered by travellers and the relative benefits of public health interventions are well defined in terms of their relative occurrence, distribution and control. Exactly how much money is wasted by poor travel advice. The real figure is anybody's guess, but it could easily- run into millions. Behrens gives one example. Britain spends more than 1 million each year just on cholera vaccines that often don't work and so give people a false sense of security."Information on the prevention and treatment of all forms of diarrhea would be a better priority, he salts.What does the author mean by saying "..., but it is notoriously difficult to gel anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy."?查看材料A.People don't pay attention to their health.B.Few people are willing to support travel medicine.C.Most travellers firmly believe that they will be safe.D.Health comes last compared with others.

请阅读短文。
Do who choose to go on exotic, far-flung holidays deserve free health advice before they travel? And even if they pay, who ensures that they get good, up-to-date information? Who, for that matter, should collect that information in the first place? For a variety of reasons, travel medicine in Britain is a responsibility nobody wants. As a result, many travellers go abroad prepared to avoid serious disease.
Why is travel medicine so unloved? Partly there's an identity problem. Because it takes an interest in anything that impinges on the health of travellers, this emerging medical specialism invariably cuts across the traditional disciplines. It delves into everything from seasickness, jet lag and the hazards of camels to malaria and plague. But travel medicine has a more serious obstacle to overcome. Travel clinics are meant to tell people how to avoid ending up dead or in a hospital when they come home, but it is notoriously difficult to get anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy.
Travel medicine has also been colonized by commercial interests; the vast majority of travel clinics in Britain are run by airlines or travel companies. And while travel concerns are happy to sell profitable injections, they may be less keen to spread bad news about travellers' diarrhea in Turkey, or to take time to spell out preventive measures travellers could take."The NHS finds it difficult to define travellers' health, says Ron Behrens, the only NHS consultant in travel and director of the travel clinic of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in London." Should it come within the NHS or should it be paid for? It's Gary area, and opinion is spilt. No one seems to have any responsibility for defining its role, he says.
To compound its low status in the medical hierarchy, travel medicine has to rely on statistics that are patchy at best. In most cases we just don't know how many Britons contract diseases when abroad. And even if a disease linked to travel there is rarely any information about where those afflicted went, what they are, how they behaved, or which vaccinations they had. This shortage of hard facts and figures makes it difficult to give detailed advice to people, information that might even save their lives.
A recent leader in British Medical Journal argued. "Travel medicine will emerge as credible disciplines only if the risks encountered by travellers and the relative benefits of public health interventions are well defined in terms of their relative occurrence, distribution and control. Exactly how much money is wasted by poor travel advice. The real figure is anybody's guess, but it could easily- run into millions. Behrens gives one example. Britain spends more than 1 million each year just on cholera vaccines that often don't work and so give people a false sense of security."Information on the prevention and treatment of all forms of diarrhea would be a better priority, he salts.

What does the author mean by saying "..., but it is notoriously difficult to gel anybody pay out money for keeping people healthy."?
查看材料

A.People don't pay attention to their health.
B.Few people are willing to support travel medicine.
C.Most travellers firmly believe that they will be safe.
D.Health comes last compared with others.

参考解析

解析:题干涉及的句子意为“众所周知,让任何人为人们健康出钱都是非常困难的”,本文的中心词是“旅行医疗”,这类新兴医疗属于健康范畴,因此可推知,人们不愿为旅行医疗投资,B项符合。

相关考题:

Please carefully read the emergency evacuation notice on the inside door of your bedroom.A.请仔细阅读贴在卧室内的应急疏散告示B.请浏览一下贴在卧室内的应急疏散告示C.请密切注意贴在墙上的应急疏散告示D.请仔细阅读应急疏散的通知

请简述早期阅读活动设计和实施的基本结构。

阅读下面短文,回答题。垫底的人陈大超小说中的徐芳有着怎样的心理特征?请简要分析。(4分)查看材料

请举例说明PQ4R阅读法。

阅读下面一段短文,然后回答下列 36~38 小题。第 36 题 概括本片段的大意。作者的观点是什么?

请根据下面提示,写一篇短文,词数不少于50In your spoken English class, your teacher shows you the following picture. You are asked to describe the picture an explain how you understand it.

请根据下面所给的题目用英语写出一篇不少于80词的短文。My Views on the Internet

请根据下面所给的题目用英语写出一篇不少于80词的短文。About Television

行政能力测试中的阅读理解考察()。 A.考生对短文的综合分析能力B.考生对数量关系的计算能力C.考生对图表的理解能力D.考生的逻辑思维能力

阅读下面短文。回答 26~25 题。第 26 题 下列关于“托迈”的说法,正确的一项是:

请仔细阅读以下程序并完成要求。 If((a>2&&b4|| d 请仔细阅读以下程序并完成要求。If((a>2&&b<3)&&(c>4|| d<5)){Flag=1;}Else{Flag=0;)请分别按照语句覆盖、判定覆盖、条件覆盖、判定/条件覆盖测试用例。

二、阅读下面短文,从短文后各题所给四个选项(A、B、C、D)中选出能填入相应空白处的最佳选项。共3题,每题1分,共3分。 阅读下面短文,回答从的 114~116 题目。Martin Luther King Jr.was born in Georgia in 1 929.When was still a boy Martin learned that his people,the black Americans,when often treated differently from most of( )fellow Americans.Many could not attend good schools,get good jobs,or live in nice houses because of the color of their ( ) .Manin knew that in a free country this was wrong.He wanted to help his black brothers,( )he decided to go to school and become a minister.第114题:( )A.hisB.thoseC.mostD.their

片断阅读理解三、片断阅读理解:共5 题。要求你阅读以下片断短文,并根据短文的内容回答问题。第56题:有一对夫妻,他们有一个儿子。一天,来了一个陌生人,他说他认识这对夫妻,还说他认识这对夫妻的儿子。 最能准确地复述这段话的意思的是A、 新来的人认识这对夫妻和他们的儿子 B、 新来的陌生人认识这对夫妻和他们的儿子 C、 新来的陌生人认识这对夫妻和他的儿子 D、 新来的陌生人自称认识这对夫妻和他们的儿子

阅读下面短文。回答 21~25 题。第 21 题 不能说明第一段中提到的“步行须遵制合礼”的一项是:

阅读下面短文.回答 18~22 题。第 18 题 从原文看,下列关于大运河保护迫在眉睫原因的分析,错误的一项是:

B)阅读短文,然后从短文括号中所给词的适当形式填空。Climbingthehighestmountainsintheworldisnotan78(easily)job.Youhavetofightbadweather,illnessandfear.ButJordanRomero,athirteen-year-oldboyfromAmerica,willclimb79(Asia)highestmountain,MountQomolangma.Hewillsetoutthismonth.80(He)parentsandhelperswillclimbwithhim.Heplanstotake81(second)monthsforhisclimb.“I'mready.ButifIdon'treachthetop82(successful),I'lltrynexttime,”hesaid.Jordanhasalreadyclimbedthehighestmountainsofsixothercontinents(洲).Ifhe83(get)tothetopthistime,hewillbecometheyoungestpersontoclimbtheworld'shighestmountain.78_________

下列关于短文法的说法,错误的是(  )。A.短文法也称书面短文法B.短文法是结果导向型考评方法的一种C.短文法的局限比较小D.适用范围比较小

下列关于短文法的说法错误的是()。A:短文法也称书面短文法B:短文法是结果导向型考评方法的一种C:短文法的局限比较小D:适用范围比较小

请认真阅读下文,并按要求作答。

请简要说明部署图的阅读步骤。

问答题改错题:阅读短文,改正文中的文字、标点符号差错。

问答题请认真阅读下列材料,并按要求作答。请根据教学内容确定本课时的语言技能(听说)目标。

问答题研究者想探讨这样一个问题:文章的生字密度对学生阅读理解成绩的影响。研究者感兴趣四种生字密度:1:5、1:10、1:15、1:20。  被试:采用随机取样的方法选取被试40人,男性20人,女性20人。视力或矫正视力正常。平均年龄为14.5岁。  材料:选取历史方面的四篇短文(1:5、1:10、1:15、1:20),这四篇短文除了生字密度不同外,在文章的长度、语法的难度上均进行了匹配。每个学生要阅读四篇短文中的每一篇,四篇短文的阅读顺序进行了随机化平衡处理。分析这个实验的自变量、因变量,以及此实验采用什么类型的实验设计(被试间设计还是被试内设计)。

问答题请简要回答阅读能力教学包含哪些内容?

问答题请结合下列词语(要全部使用),写一篇80字左右的短文。水果、锻炼、心情、享受、羡慕

问答题请结合这张图片写一篇80字左右的短文。

问答题作文提示:  阅读下面一段话后,请谈谈你的看法。(字数:150字左右)  身处他乡,没有朋友,没有亲人在身边时,想家、寂寞便会如影随形。寂寞是每个人都会遇到的情况,寂寞的时候,你如何排遣?如何战胜它?请以“战胜寂寞”为题,写一篇短文。

问答题请认真阅读下列材料,并按要求作答。请简述教师课堂上“创设语境”需要考虑的基本要素。