The following trial balance relates to Sandown at 30 September 2009:The following notes are relevant:(i) Sandown’s revenue includes $16 million for goods sold to Pending on 1 October 2008. The terms of the sale are that Sandown will incur ongoing service and support costs of $1·2 million per annum for three years after the sale. Sandown normally makes a gross profit of 40% on such servicing and support work. Ignore the time value of money.(ii) Administrative expenses include an equity dividend of 4·8 cents per share paid during the year.(iii) The 5% convertible loan note was issued for proceeds of $20 million on 1 October 2007. It has an effective interest rate of 8% due to the value of its conversion option.(iv) During the year Sandown sold an available-for-sale investment for $11 million. At the date of sale it had acarrying amount of $8·8 million and had originally cost $7 million. Sandown has recorded the disposal of theinvestment. The remaining available-for-sale investments (the $26·5 million in the trial balance) have a fair value of $29 million at 30 September 2009. The other reserve in the trial balance represents the net increase in the value of the available-for-sale investments as at 1 October 2008. Ignore deferred tax on these transactions.(v) The balance on current tax represents the under/over provision of the tax liability for the year ended 30 September 2008. The directors have estimated the provision for income tax for the year ended 30 September 2009 at $16·2 million. At 30 September 2009 the carrying amounts of Sandown’s net assets were $13 million in excess of their tax base. The income tax rate of Sandown is 30%.(vi) Non-current assets:The freehold property has a land element of $13 million. The building element is being depreciated on astraight-line basis.Plant and equipment is depreciated at 40% per annum using the reducing balance method.Sandown’s brand in the trial balance relates to a product line that received bad publicity during the year which led to falling sales revenues. An impairment review was conducted on 1 April 2009 which concluded that, based on estimated future sales, the brand had a value in use of $12 million and a remaining life of only three years.However, on the same date as the impairment review, Sandown received an offer to purchase the brand for$15 million. Prior to the impairment review, it was being depreciated using the straight-line method over a10-year life.No depreciation/amortisation has yet been charged on any non-current asset for the year ended 30 September2009. Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges are all charged to cost of sales.Required:(a) Prepare the statement of comprehensive income for Sandown for the year ended 30 September 2009.(13 marks)(b) Prepare the statement of financial position of Sandown as at 30 September 2009. (12 marks)Notes to the financial statements are not required.A statement of changes in equity is not required.
The following trial balance relates to Sandown at 30 September 2009:
The following notes are relevant:
(i) Sandown’s revenue includes $16 million for goods sold to Pending on 1 October 2008. The terms of the sale are that Sandown will incur ongoing service and support costs of $1·2 million per annum for three years after the sale. Sandown normally makes a gross profit of 40% on such servicing and support work. Ignore the time value of money.
(ii) Administrative expenses include an equity dividend of 4·8 cents per share paid during the year.
(iii) The 5% convertible loan note was issued for proceeds of $20 million on 1 October 2007. It has an effective interest rate of 8% due to the value of its conversion option.
(iv) During the year Sandown sold an available-for-sale investment for $11 million. At the date of sale it had a
carrying amount of $8·8 million and had originally cost $7 million. Sandown has recorded the disposal of the
investment. The remaining available-for-sale investments (the $26·5 million in the trial balance) have a fair value of $29 million at 30 September 2009. The other reserve in the trial balance represents the net increase in the value of the available-for-sale investments as at 1 October 2008. Ignore deferred tax on these transactions.
(v) The balance on current tax represents the under/over provision of the tax liability for the year ended 30 September 2008. The directors have estimated the provision for income tax for the year ended 30 September 2009 at $16·2 million. At 30 September 2009 the carrying amounts of Sandown’s net assets were $13 million in excess of their tax base. The income tax rate of Sandown is 30%.
(vi) Non-current assets:
The freehold property has a land element of $13 million. The building element is being depreciated on a
straight-line basis.
Plant and equipment is depreciated at 40% per annum using the reducing balance method.
Sandown’s brand in the trial balance relates to a product line that received bad publicity during the year which led to falling sales revenues. An impairment review was conducted on 1 April 2009 which concluded that, based on estimated future sales, the brand had a value in use of $12 million and a remaining life of only three years.
However, on the same date as the impairment review, Sandown received an offer to purchase the brand for
$15 million. Prior to the impairment review, it was being depreciated using the straight-line method over a
10-year life.
No depreciation/amortisation has yet been charged on any non-current asset for the year ended 30 September
2009. Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges are all charged to cost of sales.
Required:
(a) Prepare the statement of comprehensive income for Sandown for the year ended 30 September 2009.
(13 marks)
(b) Prepare the statement of financial position of Sandown as at 30 September 2009. (12 marks)
Notes to the financial statements are not required.
A statement of changes in equity is not required.
相关考题：
5 Which of the following factors could cause a company’s gross profit percentage on sales to fall below the expectedlevel?1 Understatement of closing inventories.2 The incorrect inclusion in purchases of invoices relating to goods supplied in the following period.3 The inclusion in sales of the proceeds of sale of non-current assets.4 Increased cost of carriage charges borne by the company on goods sent to customers.A 3 and 4B 2 and 4C 1 and 2D 1 and 3
Additionally the directors wish to know how the provision for deferred taxation would be calculated in the followingsituations under IAS12 ‘Income Taxes’:(i) On 1 November 2003, the company had granted ten million share options worth $40 million subject to a twoyear vesting period. Local tax law allows a tax deduction at the exercise date of the intrinsic value of the options.The intrinsic value of the ten million share options at 31 October 2004 was $16 million and at 31 October 2005was $46 million. The increase in the share price in the year to 31 October 2005 could not be foreseen at31 October 2004. The options were exercised at 31 October 2005. The directors are unsure how to accountfor deferred taxation on this transaction for the years ended 31 October 2004 and 31 October 2005.(ii) Panel is leasing plant under a finance lease over a five year period. The asset was recorded at the present valueof the minimum lease payments of $12 million at the inception of the lease which was 1 November 2004. Theasset is depreciated on a straight line basis over the five years and has no residual value. The annual leasepayments are $3 million payable in arrears on 31 October and the effective interest rate is 8% per annum. Thedirectors have not leased an asset under a finance lease before and are unsure as to its treatment for deferredtaxation. The company can claim a tax deduction for the annual rental payment as the finance lease does notqualify for tax relief.(iii) A wholly owned overseas subsidiary, Pins, a limited liability company, sold goods costing $7 million to Panel on1 September 2005, and these goods had not been sold by Panel before the year end. Panel had paid $9 millionfor these goods. The directors do not understand how this transaction should be dealt with in the financialstatements of the subsidiary and the group for taxation purposes. Pins pays tax locally at 30%.(iv) Nails, a limited liability company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Panel, and is a cash generating unit in its ownright. The value of the property, plant and equipment of Nails at 31 October 2005 was $6 million and purchasedgoodwill was $1 million before any impairment loss. The company had no other assets or liabilities. Animpairment loss of $1·8 million had occurred at 31 October 2005. The tax base of the property, plant andequipment of Nails was $4 million as at 31 October 2005. The directors wish to know how the impairment losswill affect the deferred tax provision for the year. Impairment losses are not an allowable expense for taxationpurposes.Assume a tax rate of 30%.Required:(b) Discuss, with suitable computations, how the situations (i) to (iv) above will impact on the accounting fordeferred tax under IAS12 ‘Income Taxes’ in the group financial statements of Panel. (16 marks)(The situations in (i) to (iv) above carry equal marks)
4 Ryder, a public limited company, is reviewing certain events which have occurred since its year end of 31 October2005. The financial statements were authorised on 12 December 2005. The following events are relevant to thefinancial statements for the year ended 31 October 2005:(i) Ryder has a good record of ordinary dividend payments and has adopted a recent strategy of increasing itsdividend per share annually. For the last three years the dividend per share has increased by 5% per annum.On 20 November 2005, the board of directors proposed a dividend of 10c per share for the year ended31 October 2005. The shareholders are expected to approve it at a meeting on 10 January 2006, and adividend amount of $20 million will be paid on 20 February 2006 having been provided for in the financialstatements at 31 October 2005. The directors feel that a provision should be made because a ‘valid expectation’has been created through the company’s dividend record. (3 marks)(ii) Ryder disposed of a wholly owned subsidiary, Krup, a public limited company, on 10 December 2005 and madea loss of $9 million on the transaction in the group financial statements. As at 31 October 2005, Ryder had nointention of selling the subsidiary which was material to the group. The directors of Ryder have stated that therewere no significant events which have occurred since 31 October 2005 which could have resulted in a reductionin the value of Krup. The carrying value of the net assets and purchased goodwill of Krup at 31 October 2005were $20 million and $12 million respectively. Krup had made a loss of $2 million in the period 1 November2005 to 10 December 2005. (5 marks)(iii) Ryder acquired a wholly owned subsidiary, Metalic, a public limited company, on 21 January 2004. Theconsideration payable in respect of the acquisition of Metalic was 2 million ordinary shares of $1 of Ryder plusa further 300,000 ordinary shares if the profit of Metalic exceeded $6 million for the year ended 31 October2005. The profit for the year of Metalic was $7 million and the ordinary shares were issued on 12 November2005. The annual profits of Metalic had averaged $7 million over the last few years and, therefore, Ryder hadincluded an estimate of the contingent consideration in the cost of the acquisition at 21 January 2004. The fairvalue used for the ordinary shares of Ryder at this date including the contingent consideration was $10 per share.The fair value of the ordinary shares on 12 November 2005 was $11 per share. Ryder also made a one for fourbonus issue on 13 November 2005 which was applicable to the contingent shares issued. The directors areunsure of the impact of the above on earnings per share and the accounting for the acquisition. (7 marks)(iv) The company acquired a property on 1 November 2004 which it intended to sell. The property was obtainedas a result of a default on a loan agreement by a third party and was valued at $20 million on that date foraccounting purposes which exactly offset the defaulted loan. The property is in a state of disrepair and Ryderintends to complete the repairs before it sells the property. The repairs were completed on 30 November 2005.The property was sold after costs for $27 million on 9 December 2005. The property was classified as ‘held forsale’ at the year end under IFRS5 ‘Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations’ but shown atthe net sale proceeds of $27 million. Property is depreciated at 5% per annum on the straight-line basis and nodepreciation has been charged in the year. (5 marks)(v) The company granted share appreciation rights (SARs) to its employees on 1 November 2003 based on tenmillion shares. The SARs provide employees at the date the rights are exercised with the right to receive cashequal to the appreciation in the company’s share price since the grant date. The rights vested on 31 October2005 and payment was made on schedule on 1 December 2005. The fair value of the SARs per share at31 October 2004 was $6, at 31 October 2005 was $8 and at 1 December 2005 was $9. The company hasrecognised a liability for the SARs as at 31 October 2004 based upon IFRS2 ‘Share-based Payment’ but theliability was stated at the same amount at 31 October 2005. (5 marks)Required:Discuss the accounting treatment of the above events in the financial statements of the Ryder Group for the yearended 31 October 2005, taking into account the implications of events occurring after the balance sheet date.(The mark allocations are set out after each paragraph above.)(25 marks)
2 Misson, a public limited company, has carried out transactions denominated in foreign currency during the financialyear ended 31 October 2006 and has conducted foreign operations through a foreign entity. Its functional andpresentation currency is the dollar. A summary of the foreign currency activities is set out below:(a) Misson has a 100% owned foreign subsidiary, Chong, which was formed on 1 November 2004 with a sharecapital of 100 million euros which has been taken as the cost of the investment. The total shareholders’ equityof the subsidiary as at 31 October 2005 and 31 October 2006 was 140 million euros and 160 million eurosrespectively. Chong has not paid any dividends to Misson and has no other reserves than retained earnings in itsfinancial statements. The subsidiary was sold on 31 October 2006 for 195 million euros.Misson would like to know how to treat the sale of the subsidiary in the parent and group accounts for the yearended 31 October 2006. (8 marks)Required:Discuss the accounting treatment of the above transactions in accordance with the advice required by thedirectors.(Candidates should show detailed workings as well as a discussion of the accounting treatment used.)
(b) Misson has purchased goods from a foreign supplier for 8 million euros on 31 July 2006. At 31 October 2006,the trade payable was still outstanding and the goods were still held by Misson. Similarly Misson has sold goodsto a foreign customer for 4 million euros on 31 July 2006 and it received payment for the goods in euros on31 October 2006. Additionally Misson had purchased an investment property on 1 November 2005 for28 million euros. At 31 October 2006, the investment property had a fair value of 24 million euros. The companyuses the fair value model in accounting for investment properties.Misson would like advice on how to treat these transactions in the financial statements for the year ended 31October 2006. (7 marks)Required:Discuss the accounting treatment of the above transactions in accordance with the advice required by thedirectors.(Candidates should show detailed workings as well as a discussion of the accounting treatment used.)
20 Which of the following events occurring after the balance sheet date are classified as adjusting, if material?1 The sale of inventories valued at cost at the balance sheet date for a figure in excess of cost.2 A valuation of land and buildings providing evidence of an impairment in value at the year end.3 The issue of shares and loan notes.4 The insolvency of a customer with a balance outstanding at the year end.A 1 and 3B 2 and 4C 2 and 3D 1 and 4
22 Which of the following statements about limited liability companies’ accounting is/are correct?1 A revaluation reserve arises when a non-current asset is sold at a profit.2 The authorised share capital of a company is the maximum nominal value of shares and loan notes the companymay issue.3 The notes to the financial statements must contain details of all adjusting events as defined in IAS10 Events afterthe balance sheet date.A All three statementsB 1 and 2 onlyC 2 and 3 onlyD None of the statements
(b) During the inventory count on 31 December, some goods which had cost $80,000 were found to be damaged.In February 2005 the damaged goods were sold for $85,000 by an agent who received a 10% commission outof the sale proceeds. (2 marks)Required:Advise the directors on the correct treatment of these matters, stating the relevant accounting standard whichjustifies your answer in each case.NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three matters.
The following information is relevant for questions 9 and 10A company’s draft financial statements for 2005 showed a profit of $630,000. However, the trial balance did not agree,and a suspense account appeared in the company’s draft balance sheet.Subsequent checking revealed the following errors:(1) The cost of an item of plant $48,000 had been entered in the cash book and in the plant account as $4,800.Depreciation at the rate of 10% per year ($480) had been charged.(2) Bank charges of $440 appeared in the bank statement in December 2005 but had not been entered in thecompany’s records.(3) One of the directors of the company paid $800 due to a supplier in the company’s payables ledger by a personalcheque. The bookkeeper recorded a debit in the supplier’s ledger account but did not complete the double entryfor the transaction. (The company does not maintain a payables ledger control account).(4) The payments side of the cash book had been understated by $10,000.9 Which of the above items would require an entry to the suspense account in correcting them?A All four itemsB 3 and 4 onlyC 2 and 3 onlyD 1, 2 and 4 only
3 You are the manager responsible for the audit of Albreda Co, a limited liability company, and its subsidiaries. Thegroup mainly operates a chain of national restaurants and provides vending and other catering services to corporateclients. All restaurants offer ‘eat-in’, ‘take-away’ and ‘home delivery’ services. The draft consolidated financialstatements for the year ended 30 September 2005 show revenue of $42·2 million (2004 – $41·8 million), profitbefore taxation of $1·8 million (2004 – $2·2 million) and total assets of $30·7 million (2004 – $23·4 million).The following issues arising during the final audit have been noted on a schedule of points for your attention:(a) In September 2005 the management board announced plans to cease offering ‘home delivery’ services from theend of the month. These sales amounted to $0·6 million for the year to 30 September 2005 (2004 – $0·8million). A provision of $0·2 million has been made as at 30 September 2005 for the compensation of redundantemployees (mainly drivers). Delivery vehicles have been classified as non-current assets held for sale as at 30September 2005 and measured at fair value less costs to sell, $0·8 million (carrying amount,$0·5 million). (8 marks)Required:For each of the above issues:(i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and(ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Albreda Co for the year ended30 September 2005.NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.
(b) Describe the audit work to be performed in respect of the carrying amount of the following items in thebalance sheet of GVF as at 30 September 2005:(i) goat herd; (4 marks)
(b) You are an audit manager with specific responsibility for reviewing other information in documents containingaudited financial statements before your firm’s auditor’s report is signed. The financial statements of Hegas, aprivately-owned civil engineering company, show total assets of $120 million, revenue of $261 million, and profitbefore tax of $9·2 million for the year ended 31 March 2005. Your review of the Annual Report has revealedthe following:(i) The statement of changes in equity includes $4·5 million under a separate heading of ‘miscellaneous item’which is described as ‘other difference not recognized in income’. There is no further reference to thisamount or ‘other difference’ elsewhere in the financial statements. However, the Management Report, whichis required by statute, is not audited. It discloses that ‘changes in shareholders’ equity not recognized inincome includes $4·5 million arising on the revaluation of investment properties’.The notes to the financial statements state that the company has implemented IAS 40 ‘Investment Property’for the first time in the year to 31 March 2005 and also that ‘the adoption of this standard did not have asignificant impact on Hegas’s financial position or its results of operations during 2005’.(ii) The chairman’s statement asserts ‘Hegas has now achieved a position as one of the world’s largestgenerators of hydro-electricity, with a dedicated commitment to accountable ethical professionalism’. Auditworking papers show that 14% of revenue was derived from hydro-electricity (2004: 12%). Publiclyavailable information shows that there are seven international suppliers of hydro-electricity in Africa alone,which are all at least three times the size of Hegas in terms of both annual turnover and population supplied.Required:Identify and comment on the implications of the above matters for the auditor’s report on the financialstatements of Hegas for the year ended 31 March 2005. (10 marks)
(b) Seymour offers health-related information services through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Aragon Co. Goodwill of$1·8 million recognised on the purchase of Aragon in October 2004 is not amortised but included at cost in theconsolidated balance sheet. At 30 September 2006 Seymour’s investment in Aragon is shown at cost,$4·5 million, in its separate financial statements.Aragon’s draft financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2006 show a loss before taxation of$0·6 million (2005 – $0·5 million loss) and total assets of $4·9 million (2005 – $5·7 million). The notes toAragon’s financial statements disclose that they have been prepared on a going concern basis that assumes thatSeymour will continue to provide financial support. (7 marks)Required:For each of the above issues:(i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and(ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Seymour Co for the year ended30 September 2006.NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.
(c) In November 2006 Seymour announced the recall and discontinuation of a range of petcare products. Theproduct recall was prompted by the high level of customer returns due to claims of poor quality. For the year to30 September 2006, the product range represented $8·9 million of consolidated revenue (2005 – $9·6 million)and $1·3 million loss before tax (2005 – $0·4 million profit before tax). The results of the ‘petcare’ operationsare disclosed separately on the face of the income statement. (6 marks)Required:For each of the above issues:(i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and(ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Seymour Co for the year ended30 September 2006.NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.
4 (a) ISA 701 Modifications to The Independent Auditor’s Report includes ‘suggested wording of modifying phrasesfor use when issuing modified reports’.Required:Explain and distinguish between each of the following terms:(i) ‘qualified opinion’;(ii) ‘disclaimer of opinion’;(iii) ‘emphasis of matter paragraph’. (6 marks)
We confirm our sale of the following commodities()terms and conditions()set forth below. A、in⋯thatB、on⋯whichC、for⋯asD、on⋯as
听力原文：M: We have agreed on the terms of payment. Is it possible to effect shipment in August???W: I'm afraid not. Mid September, I think.Q: When is the earliest possible time of shipment?(13)A．July.B．August.C．September.D．October.
On 1 April 2009 Pandar purchased 80% of the equity shares in Salva. The acquisition was through a share exchange of three shares in Pandar for every five shares in Salva. The market prices of Pandar’s and Salva’s shares at 1 April2009 were $6 per share and $3.20 respectively.On the same date Pandar acquired 40% of the equity shares in Ambra paying $2 per share.The summarised income statements for the three companies for the year ended 30 September 2009 are:The following information is relevant:(i) The fair values of the net assets of Salva at the date of acquisition were equal to their carrying amounts with the exception of an item of plant which had a carrying amount of $12 million and a fair value of $17 million. This plant had a remaining life of five years (straight-line depreciation) at the date of acquisition of Salva. All depreciation is charged to cost of sales.In addition Salva owns the registration of a popular internet domain name. The registration, which had anegligible cost, has a five year remaining life (at the date of acquisition); however, it is renewable indefinitely at a nominal cost. At the date of acquisition the domain name was valued by a specialist company at $20 million.The fair values of the plant and the domain name have not been reflected in Salva’s financial statements.No fair value adjustments were required on the acquisition of the investment in Ambra.(ii) Immediately after its acquisition of Salva, Pandar invested $50 million in an 8% loan note from Salva. All interest accruing to 30 September 2009 had been accounted for by both companies. Salva also has other loans in issue at 30 September 2009.(iii) Pandar has credited the whole of the dividend it received from Salva to investment income.(iv) After the acquisition, Pandar sold goods to Salva for $15 million on which Pandar made a gross profit of 20%. Salva had one third of these goods still in its inventory at 30 September 2009. There are no intra-group current account balances at 30 September 2009.(v) The non-controlling interest in Salva is to be valued at its (full) fair value at the date of acquisition. For thispurpose Salva’s share price at that date can be taken to be indicative of the fair value of the shareholding of the non-controlling interest.(vi) The goodwill of Salva has not suffered any impairment; however, due to its losses, the value of Pandar’sinvestment in Ambra has been impaired by $3 million at 30 September 2009.(vii) All items in the above income statements are deemed to accrue evenly over the year unless otherwise indicated.Required:(a) (i) Calculate the goodwill arising on the acquisition of Salva at 1 April 2009; (6 marks)(ii) Calculate the carrying amount of the investment in Ambra to be included within the consolidatedstatement of financial position as at 30 September 2009. (3 marks)(b) Prepare the consolidated income statement for the Pandar Group for the year ended 30 September 2009.(16 marks)
(a) The following information relates to Crosswire a publicly listed company.Summarised statements of financial position as at:The following information is available:(i) During the year to 30 September 2009, Crosswire embarked on a replacement and expansion programme for its non-current assets. The details of this programme are:On 1 October 2008 Crosswire acquired a platinum mine at a cost of $5 million. A condition of mining theplatinum is a requirement to landscape the mining site at the end of its estimated life of ten years. Thepresent value of this cost at the date of the purchase was calculated at $3 million (in addition to thepurchase price of the mine of $5 million).Also on 1 October 2008 Crosswire revalued its freehold land for the first time. The credit in the revaluationreserve is the net amount of the revaluation after a transfer to deferred tax on the gain. The tax rate applicable to Crosswire for deferred tax is 20% per annum.On 1 April 2009 Crosswire took out a finance lease for some new plant. The fair value of the plant was$10 million. The lease agreement provided for an initial payment on 1 April 2009 of $2·4 million followedby eight six-monthly payments of $1·2 million commencing 30 September 2009.Plant disposed of during the year had a carrying amount of $500,000 and was sold for $1·2 million. Theremaining movement on the property, plant and equipment, after charging depreciation of $3 million, wasthe cost of replacing plant.(ii) From 1 October 2008 to 31 March 2009 a further $500,000 was spent completing the developmentproject at which date marketing and production started. The sales of the new product proved disappointingand on 30 September 2009 the development costs were written down to $1 million via an impairmentcharge.(iii) During the year ended 30 September 2009, $4 million of the 10% convertible loan notes matured. Theloan note holders had the option of redemption at par in cash or to exchange them for equity shares on thebasis of 20 new shares for each $100 of loan notes. 75% of the loan-note holders chose the equity option.Ignore any effect of this on the other equity reserve.All the above items have been treated correctly according to International Financial Reporting Standards.(iv) The finance costs are made up of:Required:(i) Prepare a statement of the movements in the carrying amount of Crosswire’s non-current assets for theyear ended 30 September 2009; (9 marks)(ii) Calculate the amounts that would appear under the headings of ‘cash flows from investing activities’and ‘cash flows from financing activities’ in the statement of cash flows for Crosswire for the year ended30 September 2009.Note: Crosswire includes finance costs paid as a financing activity. (8 marks)(b) A substantial shareholder has written to the directors of Crosswire expressing particular concern over thedeterioration of the company’s return on capital employed (ROCE)Required:Calculate Crosswire’s ROCE for the two years ended 30 September 2008 and 2009 and comment on theapparent cause of its deterioration.Note: ROCE should be taken as profit before interest on long-term borrowings and tax as a percentage of equity plus loan notes and finance lease obligations (at the year end). (8 marks)
(a) An assistant of yours has been criticised over a piece of assessed work that he produced for his study course for giving the definition of a non-current asset as ‘a physical asset of substantial cost, owned by the company, which will last longer than one year’.Required:Provide an explanation to your assistant of the weaknesses in his definition of non-current assets whencompared to the International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) view of assets. (4 marks)(b) The same assistant has encountered the following matters during the preparation of the draft financial statements of Darby for the year ending 30 September 2009. He has given an explanation of his treatment of them.(i) Darby spent $200,000 sending its staff on training courses during the year. This has already led to animprovement in the company’s efficiency and resulted in cost savings. The organiser of the course has stated that the benefits from the training should last for a minimum of four years. The assistant has therefore treated the cost of the training as an intangible asset and charged six months’ amortisation based on the average date during the year on which the training courses were completed. (3 marks)(ii) During the year the company started research work with a view to the eventual development of a newprocessor chip. By 30 September 2009 it had spent $1·6 million on this project. Darby has a past historyof being particularly successful in bringing similar projects to a profitable conclusion. As a consequence theassistant has treated the expenditure to date on this project as an asset in the statement of financial position.Darby was also commissioned by a customer to research and, if feasible, produce a computer system toinstall in motor vehicles that can automatically stop the vehicle if it is about to be involved in a collision. At30 September 2009, Darby had spent $2·4 million on this project, but at this date it was uncertain as towhether the project would be successful. As a consequence the assistant has treated the $2·4 million as anexpense in the income statement. (4 marks)(iii) Darby signed a contract (for an initial three years) in August 2009 with a company called Media Today toinstall a satellite dish and cabling system to a newly built group of residential apartments. Media Today willprovide telephone and television services to the residents of the apartments via the satellite system and payDarby $50,000 per annum commencing in December 2009. Work on the installation commenced on1 September 2009 and the expenditure to 30 September 2009 was $58,000. The installation is expectedto be completed by 31 October 2009. Previous experience with similar contracts indicates that Darby willmake a total profit of $40,000 over the three years on this initial contract. The assistant correctly recordedthe costs to 30 September 2009 of $58,000 as a non-current asset, but then wrote this amount down to$40,000 (the expected total profit) because he believed the asset to be impaired.The contract is not a finance lease. Ignore discounting. (4 marks)Required:For each of the above items (i) to (iii) comment on the assistant’s treatment of them in the financialstatements for the year ended 30 September 2009 and advise him how they should be treated underInternational Financial Reporting Standards.Note: the mark allocation is shown against each of the three items above.
(a) The following figures have been calculated from the financial statements (including comparatives) of Barstead forthe year ended 30 September 2009:increase in profit after taxation 80%increase in (basic) earnings per share 5%increase in diluted earnings per share 2%Required:Explain why the three measures of earnings (profit) growth for the same company over the same period cangive apparently differing impressions. (4 marks)(b) The profit after tax for Barstead for the year ended 30 September 2009 was $15 million. At 1 October 2008 the company had in issue 36 million equity shares and a $10 million 8% convertible loan note. The loan note will mature in 2010 and will be redeemed at par or converted to equity shares on the basis of 25 shares for each $100 of loan note at the loan-note holders’ option. On 1 January 2009 Barstead made a fully subscribed rights issue of one new share for every four shares held at a price of $2·80 each. The market price of the equity shares of Barstead immediately before the issue was $3·80. The earnings per share (EPS) reported for the year ended 30 September 2008 was 35 cents.Barstead’s income tax rate is 25%.Required:Calculate the (basic) EPS figure for Barstead (including comparatives) and the diluted EPS (comparatives not required) that would be disclosed for the year ended 30 September 2009. (6 marks)
Hindberg is a car retailer. On 1 April 2014, Hindberg sold a car to Latterly on the following terms:The selling price of the car was $25,300. Latterly paid $12,650 (half of the cost) on 1 April 2014 and would pay the remaining $12,650 on 31 March 2016 (two years after the sale). Hindberg’s cost of capital is 10% per annum.What is the total amount which Hindberg should credit to profit or loss in respect of this transaction in the year ended 31 March 2015?A.$23,105B.$23,000C.$20,909D.$24,150
You are the audit manager of Chestnut Co and are reviewing the key issues identified in the files of two audit clients.Palm Industries Co (Palm)Palm’s year end was 31 March 2015 and the draft financial statements show revenue of $28·2 million, receivables of $5·6 million and profit before tax of $4·8 million. The fieldwork stage for this audit has been completed.A customer of Palm owed an amount of $350,000 at the year end. Testing of receivables in April highlighted that no amounts had been paid to Palm from this customer as they were disputing the quality of certain goods received from Palm. The finance director is confident the issue will be resolved and no allowance for receivables was made with regards to this balance.Ash Trading Co (Ash)Ash is a new client of Chestnut Co, its year end was 31 January 2015 and the firm was only appointed auditors in February 2015, as the previous auditors were suddenly unable to undertake the audit. The fieldwork stage for this audit is currently ongoing.The inventory count at Ash’s warehouse was undertaken on 31 January 2015 and was overseen by the company’s internal audit department. Neither Chestnut Co nor the previous auditors attended the count. Detailed inventory records were maintained but it was not possible to undertake another full inventory count subsequent to the year end.The draft financial statements show a profit before tax of $2·4 million, revenue of $10·1 million and inventory of $510,000.Required:For each of the two issues:(i) Discuss the issue, including an assessment of whether it is material;(ii) Recommend ONE procedure the audit team should undertake to try to resolve the issue; and(iii) Describe the impact on the audit report if the issue remains UNRESOLVED.Notes:1 The total marks will be split equally between each of the two issues.2 Audit report extracts are NOT required.
Which of the following is NOT a condition of the sale?A.Flights must begin after May 21stB.Flights must fall between May 1st and October 1stC.Flights must end by October 1stD.Flights must be paid for by May 1st
Which is the most accurate statement regarding the business requirements development service component in the prepare phase. Select exactly 1 answer（s） from the following：（）。A、Determine the appropriate cooling temperature for a customers server roomB、Analyze the customers business requirements for a proposed solutionC、Analyze a customers ongoing operational requirementsD、Identify a customers technology requirements
According to Incoterms 2010，which groups of the following trade terms mean that the seller should contract for the carriage of the goods？（）A、CPT；CIPB、CFR；CIFC、CPT；FCAD、FOB；FAS
Which design phase service component includes the development and documentation of the test case or cases used to verify that a deployed infrastructure meets operational， functional， and interface requirements？ Select exactly 1 answer（s） from the following：（）。A、Implementation PlanB、Business PlanC、Staging PlanD、Detailed Design DevelopmentE、Systems Acceptance Test Plan Development