单选题Based on the tone and content of the passage, it is most likely which of the following?AA book review in a journal intended for astrophysics professionalsBA movie review in an entertainment industry publicationCA book review in a science magazine aimed at a general audienceDA book review in a newspaperEA transcript of a talk given at a science fiction convention dedicated to “the poetry of space”
单选题
Based on the tone and content of the passage, it is most likely which of the following?
A
A book review in a journal intended for astrophysics professionals
B
A movie review in an entertainment industry publication
C
A book review in a science magazine aimed at a general audience
D
A book review in a newspaper
E
A transcript of a talk given at a science fiction convention dedicated to “the poetry of space”
参考解析
解析：
推断题。文章中没有运用大量专业名词，而且是对Egbert Larson的书进行的评读，故可以推测本文是面向大众的一片书评文章，故本题选C项。
推断题。文章中没有运用大量专业名词，而且是对Egbert Larson的书进行的评读，故可以推测本文是面向大众的一片书评文章，故本题选C项。
相关考题：
In performing an impact analysis, the most effective tool to ensure all risks are identified on large projects is the:A Work breakdown structureB milestone review and schedule techniqueC cost/schedule control systemD planning programming budget systemE program and evaluation review technique
The review for the specification completeness is performed during which of the following cycles.A Award cyclesB requirements cycleC requisition cycleD solicitation cycleE contractual cycle
听力原文： [29] Moving away from newspapers, let's now focus on magazines. Now the first magazine was a little periodical called The Review, and it was started in London in 1704. It looked a lot like the newspapers of the time. But in terms of its content, it was much different. [30] Newspapers were concerned mainly with news events, but The Review focused on important domestic issues of the day, as well as the policies of the government. Now in England at that time, people could still be thrown in jail for publishing articles that were critical of the king. And that's what happened to Daniel Defoe. He was the outspoken founder of The Review. Defoe actually wrote the first issue of The Review from prison. You see, he had been arrested because of his writings that criticized the policies of the Church of England, which was headed by the king. After his release, Defoe continued to produce The Review and the magazine started to appear on a more frequent schedule, about three times a week. It didn't take long for other magazines to start popping up. [31] In 1709, a magazine called The Tattler began publication. This new magazine contained a mixture of news, poetry, political analysis, and philosophical essays.(30)A．Early newspapers in England.B．The early history of magazines.C．The life of Daniel Defoe.D．Differences between newspapers and magazines.
An administrator will replace five current servers. Which of the following is the MOST important to review before installing new servers?() A. Verify uninterruptible power supply (UPS) loadB. Verify if server consumes 220VC. Verify CPU loadD. Verify if server consumes 110V
The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process,editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today.The policy follows similar efforts from other journals,after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.“Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,”writes McNutt in an editorial.Working with the American Statistical Association,the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors（SBoRE）.Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal’s internal editors,or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers.The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change,McNutt said:“The creation of the‘statistics board’was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of?Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.”Giovanni Parmigiani,a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health,a member of the SBoRE group.He says he expects the board to“play primarily an advisory role.”He agreed to join because he“found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel,unique and likely to have a lasting impact.This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself,but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”John Ioannidis,a physician who studies research methodology,says that the policy is“a most welcome step forward”and“long overdue.”“Most journals are weak in statistical review,and this damages the quality of what they publish.I think that,for the majority of scientific papers nowadays,statistical review is more essential than expert review,”he says.But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine,the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data,but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research,according to David Vaux,a cell biologist.Researchers should improve their standards,he wrote in 2012,but journals should also take a tougher line,“engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process”.Vaux says that Science’s idea to pass some papers to statisticians“has some merit,but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify‘the papers that need scrutiny’in the first place”.Which of the following is the best title of the text?A.Science Joins Push to Screen Statistics in Papers.B.Professional Statisticians Deserve More RespectC.Data Analysis Finds Its Way onto Editors’DesksD.Statisticians Are Coming Back with Science
The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process,editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today.The policy follows similar efforts from other journals,after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.“Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,”writes McNutt in an editorial.Working with the American Statistical Association,the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors（SBoRE）.Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal’s internal editors,or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers.The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change,McNutt said:“The creation of the‘statistics board’was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of?Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.”Giovanni Parmigiani,a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health,a member of the SBoRE group.He says he expects the board to“play primarily an advisory role.”He agreed to join because he“found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel,unique and likely to have a lasting impact.This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself,but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”John Ioannidis,a physician who studies research methodology,says that the policy is“a most welcome step forward”and“long overdue.”“Most journals are weak in statistical review,and this damages the quality of what they publish.I think that,for the majority of scientific papers nowadays,statistical review is more essential than expert review,”he says.But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine,the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data,but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research,according to David Vaux,a cell biologist.Researchers should improve their standards,he wrote in 2012,but journals should also take a tougher line,“engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process”.Vaux says that Science’s idea to pass some papers to statisticians“has some merit,but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify‘the papers that need scrutiny’in the first place”.The phrase“flagged up”（Para.2）is the closest in meaning toA.found.B.marked.C.revised.D.stored.
The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process,editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today.The policy follows similar efforts from other journals,after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.“Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,”writes McNutt in an editorial.Working with the American Statistical Association,the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors（SBoRE）.Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal’s internal editors,or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers.The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change,McNutt said:“The creation of the‘statistics board’was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of?Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.”Giovanni Parmigiani,a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health,a member of the SBoRE group.He says he expects the board to“play primarily an advisory role.”He agreed to join because he“found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel,unique and likely to have a lasting impact.This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself,but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”John Ioannidis,a physician who studies research methodology,says that the policy is“a most welcome step forward”and“long overdue.”“Most journals are weak in statistical review,and this damages the quality of what they publish.I think that,for the majority of scientific papers nowadays,statistical review is more essential than expert review,”he says.But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine,the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data,but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research,according to David Vaux,a cell biologist.Researchers should improve their standards,he wrote in 2012,but journals should also take a tougher line,“engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process”.Vaux says that Science’s idea to pass some papers to statisticians“has some merit,but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify‘the papers that need scrutiny’in the first place”.It can be learned from Paragraph 1 thatA.Science intends to simplify their peer-review process.B.journals are strengthening their statistical checks.C.few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis.D.lack of data analysis is common in research projects.
The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process,editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today.The policy follows similar efforts from other journals,after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.“Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,”writes McNutt in an editorial.Working with the American Statistical Association,the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors（SBoRE）.Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal’s internal editors,or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers.The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change,McNutt said:“The creation of the‘statistics board’was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of?Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.”Giovanni Parmigiani,a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health,a member of the SBoRE group.He says he expects the board to“play primarily an advisory role.”He agreed to join because he“found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel,unique and likely to have a lasting impact.This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself,but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”John Ioannidis,a physician who studies research methodology,says that the policy is“a most welcome step forward”and“long overdue.”“Most journals are weak in statistical review,and this damages the quality of what they publish.I think that,for the majority of scientific papers nowadays,statistical review is more essential than expert review,”he says.But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine,the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data,but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research,according to David Vaux,a cell biologist.Researchers should improve their standards,he wrote in 2012,but journals should also take a tougher line,“engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process”.Vaux says that Science’s idea to pass some papers to statisticians“has some merit,but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify‘the papers that need scrutiny’in the first place”.Giovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoRE mayA.pose a threat to all its peers.B.meet with strong opposition.C.increase Science’s circulation.D.set an example for other journals.
Which of the following techniques is used for tracking the project risks？（）A、Probability-Impact matrixB、Pareto chartC、R-ChartD、PERT （Program Evaluation and Review Technique） analysis
An administrator will replace five current servers. Which of the following is the MOST important to review before installing new servers？（）A、 Verify uninterruptible power supply （UPS） loadB、 Verify if server consumes 220VC、 Verify CPU loadD、 Verify if server consumes 110V
Which of the following technologies allows an administrator to submit traffic to an IDS for review?（）A、Spanning treeB、VLANC、PoED、Port mirroring
Which of the following commands can be used to review the system error logs？（）A、 errpt -aB、 errpt -lC、 errdemon -lD、 syslogd -r
A customer has a failing HBA adapter and needs to identify the location of the adapter. Which of the following AIX commands should the specialist recommend the customer review？（）A、rmdevB、chdevC、drslotD、cfgmgr
A system administrator decides to review the system error log after installing new hardware. Which of the following is the correct command to use？（）A、errptB、syslogC、prtdiagD、errlogger
Which tasks are necessary to perform a data migration using DFSMS?（）A、Microcode review and data classificationB、Initialization and data classificationC、Microcode review, ACS routine, and back up of dataD、Data classification, ACS routine, and back up of data
单选题hans is designing the reviews application. the application will include two forms :review and response, in the view ,the response documents do not appear under the review documents from which they were created, what could be causing this to happen .（）Ainheritance in the review form was disabled Bshared values were enabled on both forms Cshared field values and field definitions were enabled Dshow response documents in a hierarchy was not enabled
单选题An administrator needs to review the open ports on a host. Which of the following commands should they use？（）Atraceroute -dBping -tCnetstat -anoDnbtstat -a
单选题This passage most probably is _____.Aa book reviewBthe preface of a bookCthe post script of a bookDthe concluding part of a book
单选题An administrator will replace five current servers. Which of the following is the MOST important to review before installing new servers？（）A Verify uninterruptible power supply （UPS） loadB Verify if server consumes 220VC Verify CPU loadD Verify if server consumes 110V
单选题An administrator will replace five current servers. Which of the following is the MOST important to review before installing new servers?（）AVerify uninterruptible power supply (UPS) loadBVerify if server consumes 220VCVerify CPU loadDVerify if server consumes 110V
单选题Which tasks are necessary to perform a data migration using DFSMS?（）AMicrocode review and data classificationBInitialization and data classificationCMicrocode review, ACS routine, and back up of dataDData classification, ACS routine, and back up of data
单选题Which of the following techniques is used for tracking the project risks？（）AProbability-Impact matrixBPareto chartCR-ChartDPERT （Program Evaluation and Review Technique） analysis
单选题Which of the following commands can be used to review the system error logs？（）A errpt -aB errpt -lC errdemon -lD syslogd -r
单选题A customer has a failing HBA adapter and needs to identify the location of the adapter. Which of the following AIX commands should the specialist recommend the customer review？（）ArmdevBchdevCdrslotDcfgmgr
单选题A system administrator decides to review the system error log after installing new hardware. Which of the following is the correct command to use？（）AerrptBsyslogCprtdiagDerrlogger
单选题What does the review state about the book?AIt has been comprehensively researched.BIt is not a professional piece of work.CIt deals with the subject impartially.DIt does not have a list of sources.
单选题Which of the following technologies allows an administrator to submit traffic to an IDS for review?（）ASpanning treeBVLANCPoEDPort mirroring