---

---

---

---

---

目录 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap2_html 2009年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap3_html 2008年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap4_html 2007年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap5_html 2006年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap6_html 2005年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 HYPERLINK l Top_of_chap7_html 2004年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 2009年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 2008年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 2007年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题 2006年南京农业大学626基础英语考研真题试题编号：326 试题名称：基础英语 注意：答题（含填空）一律答在答题纸上，答在草稿纸或试卷上一律无效试 卷 一Part I Reading Comprehension (two points each ,40 points)Directions: In this section there are four passages followed by twenty multiple-choices. Read the passages carefully and then mark your answer in your Answer Sheet. Text A “Partnership” between government and private business is much in vogue. Bill Clinton, for one, is all for it. Government should not seek to displace private enterprise, he says, but strive to help it work better. And government has much to learn from business: if bureaucracies can be confronted with some of the incentives and disciplines that work in the private sector, they too can become more efficient.Britains Conservative government has said similar things for years-admittedly, with more emphasis on what government learn from private enterprise than on what the state can do for business. So widely has this notion of partnership spread that Britains Labour Party, which has traditionally seen the private sector as an obstacle to success, is suddenly an enthusiastic believer. It has published a document on “promoting a partnership between public and private finance”, arguing that private capital should be used, to an even greater extent than already envisaged by the Tory government, to pay for investment in public infrastructurewhich, in the Labour Partys view, means not merely roads and bridges but also “social infrastructure” such as “Child care facilities.”In Britain, as in America and many other industrial countries, this particular form of partnership-the use of private capital for public investmentis proving especially beguiling. Unfortunately, this is so mainly for bad reasons. Before a suspiciously broad consensus moves too far from speech-making to action, and a policy that seems to offer something to everyone goes wrong, some careful thinking is called for.The main bad reason for proposing this new financial partnership is that it makes for convenient bookkeeping-so much so that all sorts of apparently worthwhile investments start to look costless. The argument, at its crudest, goes as follows. The country plainly needs a new road. The government could build it-but how would it meet the cost? Higher taxes would be unpopular. That leaves borrowing. There are 、good reasons to pay for an investment-which yields its benefits over many years-by borrowing over a span of time. But another difficulty arises: most industrial-country governments are already borrowing too much. The governments of Britain and America are both struggling to cut their financial defic、its. Adding to public borrowing looks out of the question. The solution seems obvious: let private finance meet the cost. That way, public borrowing does not rise. A needed investment goes ahead. Banks and other private lenders win new business. The construction and child-care industries take on new

---

---

---

---

---

---

• 院感知识应知应会
• 幼儿教育科学研究方法
• 工程系列(道路与桥梁)
• 山东住院医师妇产科
• 话剧影视文学
• 福建住院医师
• 港口技术工种技能考试
• 00389学前教育科学研究
• 中医护理学相关专业知识
• 中国音乐史
• 初级压缩机工
• 甘肃
• 家电导购员知识竞赛
• 河北住院医师整形外科
• 11960危机管理
• 足球知识文化竞赛
• 内蒙古住院医师放射科
• 儒学与生活
• 02554农业政策与法规
• 中成药品知识竞赛