单选题Loss or damage caused by cutting away wreck or parts of the ship which have been previously carried away or are effectively lost by accident shall not be made（）as general average．AfirmBsureCgoodDfair
单选题
Loss or damage caused by cutting away wreck or parts of the ship which have been previously carried away or are effectively lost by accident shall not be made（）as general average．
A
firm
B
sure
C
good
D
fair
参考解析
解析：
暂无解析
相关考题：
(ii) Identify and explain the potential financial statement risks caused by the breach of planning regulationsdiscussed in the press cutting. (6 marks)
Frontotemporal dementia is a disease[ A] identified with loss of memory.[ B] causing damage to certain parts of the brain.[ C] whose patients may develop new talents.[ D] whose symptoms are similar to those of Alzheimer's patients.
If the Shipowner can only show that some part of the damage to the goods was due to a cause within the exception， he must also show how much of the damage is comprised in that part， otherwise he is liable ________ ．A.for the partB.for the wholeC.for the parts of damage not due to causes within the exceptionD.for the parts of damage due to causes within the exception
In the case of ________ the Insured ship，this Company shall be liable for the reasonable costs of replacements and repairs．A.loss of or damage toB.a partial loss toC.the missing ofD.a total loss of
An underwriter is liable for ______.A.loss arising from the subject itself because of its inherent qualitiesB.loss caused by the ordinary evaporation of liquidsC.loss caused by heavy weatherD.the natural decay of the vessel due to the passage of time
If he is a common carrier，he is absolutely responsible to the owner of the goods carried ______ any loss or damage to them unless caused by an Act of God or the Queen's enemies，or the inherent vice in the goods themselves，or the negligence of the owner of the goods，or a general average sacrifice．A.byB.toC.atD.for
Owners are to be responsible for loss of or damage to the goods or delay in delivery of the goods only in case the loss，damage or delay has been caused by the improper or negligent stowage of the goods．This means that ______.A.Owners are to be responsible for loss or damage even such loss or damage is not caused by the improper stowageB.Owners are only responsible for the loss or damage or delay caused by improper or negligent stowage．C.Both A and B are rightD.Both A and B are wrong
The Insurance Company shall be liable for ______.A.loss or damage caused by unseaworthiness of the insured shipB.demurrage of the insured ship and other indirect expensesC.reasonable expenses for ascertaining the loss or damage within the scope of CoverD.A，B，C are all wrong
The carrier shall not be liable for the loss of or damage to the goods occurred during the period of carrier's responsibility arising or resulting from any of the following causes except ______．A.Fire，unless caused by the actual fault of the carrierB.Force majeure and perils，dangers and accidents of the sea or other navigable watersC.War or armed conflictD.Intentional misconducts by the crew members on board the ship against the carrier
______ cover loss of or damage to the subject-matter insured caused by perils of the seas rivers lakes or other navigable waters．A.INSTITUTE TIME CLAUSES-HullsB.INSTITUTE MARINE CARGO CLAUSESC.P&I Clubs Terms and ConditionsD.York-Antwerp Rules 1974
Damage by ______ shall not be considered as handling damage．A.exposure to inclement weather conditionsB.carelessnessC.the use of improper gearD.moisture caused by condensation
材料：The fact that the GOODs were damaged raises a prima facie case of negligence which can only be cleared by the carrier by showing what actually occurred. For example，a ship carried grain on MS Great Lakes to a port where it was stored aboard the ship under a special storage contract for 22 days after which it was discovered to be wet．Rough weather during the voyage was alleged but the Court insisted on strict proof of how and when the rough weather caused the wetting．Therefore，to rebut the presumption of fault when relying upon its own reasonable care，the carrier must further prove that the damage was caused by something other than its own negligence．Once the shipper establishes a prima facie case，under“the policy of the law”the carrier must“explain what took place or suffer the consequences”．The law casts upon the carrier the burden of the loss which it cannot explain or，explaining，bring within the exception case in which he is relieved from liability．问题：The best title of this passage is ______．A.The liabilities on the part of the carrier and shipperB.Loss of and damage to cargoesC.The burden of proof on the part of the shipperD.The burden of proof on the part of the carrierIt is concluded from this passage that MS Great Lakes ______．A.was liable for the wet damage if it could not prove how and when the rough weather caused the wettingB.was liable for the wet damage even it could prove how and when the rough weather caused the wettingC.was liable for the wet damage even it could not prove how and when the rough weather caused the wettingD.was not liable for the wet damage if it could not prove how and when the rough weather caused the wettingAccording to this passage，_______．A.If a carrier cannot bring the reason of the loss into the exception case in which he is relieved from liability，he is liable for the lossB.Even a carrier can bring the reason of the loss into the exception case in which he is relieved from liability，he is still held liable for the loss by the courtC.Should a carrier bring the reason of the loss into the exception case in which he is relieved from liability，he could be held liable for the loss by the courtD.Should a carrier not bring the reason of the loss into the exception case in which he is relieved from liability，he could not be held liable for the loss by the courtThe prima facie case of negligence in this passage refers to the one in which ______．A.a presumption of fault was made on the part of the carrierB.a presumption of fault was made on the part of the shipperC.a reasonable care was used by the carrierD.a reasonable care was used by the shipper请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！
材料:Some older decisions have held that the carrier，in order to rebut the presumption of liability resulting from the arrival in damaged condition of GOODs shipped undamaged，must prove not only that the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils，but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the carriers part．Most more recent decisions and authors，however，uphold the view that，in general，the carrier may rebut the claimants prima facie case simply by proving that the loss was caused by an excepted peril．At that point，the onus switches to the cargo claimant to prove that the true cause of the loss was the carriers negligence．Nevertheless certain Hague and Hague/Visby Rules exceptions，expressly or implicitly，also require the carrier to negative its own negligence in proving the exception itself．For example，a clause in the said rules expressly imposes on the carrier the burden of proving that the loss or damage occurred without its actual fault or privity and without any fault or neglect on the part of its servants or agents．The carrier，however，must truly prove the existence of one or more of the exceptions and their causative role in respect of the loss or damage．Conjectures and speculation do not take the place of hard evidence．A court has held：“Mere speculation will not overcome the prima facie evidence of a clean bill of lading”．问题：The carrier will be held liable for the loss or damage if _______．A.it is proved that he has privity to the loss or damageB.it is proved that the fault or neglect on his part is not the true cause of the loss or damageC.it is too onerous for him to demonstrate that the loss or damage is caused by what is beyond his controlD.if there are conjectures and speculationIn accordance with old decisions，the carrier will not be excused unless he has proved that _______．A.not only the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils，but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the his partB.the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perilsC.the harm did not result from any negligence on his partD.there are conjectures and speculationIn accordance with most more recent decisions and authors，the carrier will not be excused unless he has proved that _______．A.not only the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils，but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the his partB.the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perilsC.the harm did not result from any negligence on his partD.there are conjectures and speculationIt is concluded that _______．A.The carrier is not in a position to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perilsB.It can not be decided that whether the carrier has to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils because there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby RulesC.The carrier does not have to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils due to the fact that there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby RulesD.The carrier must truly prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils even there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby Rules请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！
A power loss during a firmware update would MOST likely result in which of the following?（）A、Increased heat outputB、Damage of the hardwareC、Loss of storage dataD、Decreased performance
单选题Damage by（）shall not be considered as handling damage.Aexposure to inclement weather conditionsBcarelessnessCthe use of improper gearDmoisture caused by condensation
单选题Owners are to be responsible for loss of or damage to the goods or delay in delivery of the goods only in case the loss，damage or delay has been caused by the improper or negligent stowage of the goods．This means that（）.AOwners are to be responsible for loss or damage even such loss or damage is not caused by the improper stowageBOwners are only responsible for the loss or damage or delay caused by improper or negligent stowageCBoth A and B are rightDBoth A and B are wrong
单选题If the Shipowner relies on an excepted peril，he must（）that the loss or damage was caused thereby.AproveBapproveCdisproveDimprove
单选题The buttocks are ______ most other parts in the body.Alikely less to cause fatal damage thanBlikely less causing fatal damage toCless likely to cause fatal damage thanDless likely to cause fatal damage to
单选题The carrier is liable for loss of or damage to the goods or delay in delivery caused by fire，（）the claimant proves that the fire arose from fault or neglect on the part of the carrier，his servants or agents.AshouldBshallCthatDif
单选题If he is a common carrier，he is absolutely responsible to the owner of the goods carried （）any loss or damage to them unless caused by an Act of God or the Queen’s enemies，or the inherent vice in the goods themselves，or the negligence of the owner of the goods，or a general average sacrifice.AbyBtoCatDfor
单选题（），I hereby note my protest against all losses and damages，etc.，reserving the right to extend same at time and place convenient．AFearing loss and／or damageBTo fear loss and／or damageCFor fear loss and／or damageDFear loss and／or damage
单选题In North America, ______.Aconsumers cut down 2 and half million hectares of forest each year.Bthe forest service spends a huge sum of money trying to repair the damage caused by consumers.Cdeforestation has cause huge amount of loss.Dfires have caused steep loss to the forests.