共用题干InterviewThe importance and focus of the interview in the work of the print and broadcast journalist arereflected in several books that have been written on the topic .Most of these books,as well as several chapters,mainly in,but not limited to,journalism and broadcasting handbooks and reportingtexts,stress the"how to"aspects of journalistic interviewing rather than the conceptual aspects of the interview,its context,and,implications.Much of the"how to"material is based on personal experiences and general impressions.As we know,in journalism as in other fields,much can be learned from the systematic study of professional practice.Such study brings together evidence from which broad generalized principles can be developed.There is,as has been suggested,a growing body of research literature in journalism andbroadcasting,but very little significant attention has been devoted to the study of the interview itself. On the other hand,many general texts as well as numerous research articles on interviewingin fields other than journalism have been written.Many of these books and articles present thetheoretical and empirical aspects of the interview as well as the training of the interviewers.Unhappily,this plentiful general literature about interviewing pays little attention to the journalisticinterview seems to be surprising for two reasons.First,it seems likely that most people in modern Western societies are more familiar,at least in a positive manner,with journalistic interviewing than with any other form of interviewing. Most of us are probably somewhat familiar with the clinical interview,such as that conducted by physicians and psychologists.In these situations the professional person or interviewer is interested in getting information necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of the person seeking help.Another familiar situation is the job interview.However, very few of us have actually been interviewed personally by the mass media,particularly by television.And yet,we have a vivid acquaintance with the journalistic interview by virtue of our roles as readers,listeners,and viewers.Even so,true understanding of the journalistic interview,especially television interview,requires thoughtful analysis and even study,as this book indicates. Much research has been done on interviews in general,so the training of journalistic inter- viewers has likewise been strengthened.A: RightB: WrongC: Not mentioned
共用题干
Interview
The importance and focus of the interview in the work of the print and broadcast journalist are
reflected in several books that have been written on the topic .Most of these books,as well as several chapters,mainly in,but not limited to,journalism and broadcasting handbooks and reporting
texts,stress the"how to"aspects of journalistic interviewing rather than the conceptual aspects of the interview,its context,and,implications.Much of the"how to"material is based on personal experiences and general impressions.As we know,in journalism as in other fields,much can be learned from the systematic study of professional practice.Such study brings together evidence from which broad generalized principles can be developed.
There is,as has been suggested,a growing body of research literature in journalism and
broadcasting,but very little significant attention has been devoted to the study of the interview itself. On the other hand,many general texts as well as numerous research articles on interviewing
in fields other than journalism have been written.Many of these books and articles present the
theoretical and empirical aspects of the interview as well as the training of the interviewers.Unhappily,this plentiful general literature about interviewing pays little attention to the journalistic
interview seems to be surprising for two reasons.First,it seems likely that most people in modern Western societies are more familiar,at least in a positive manner,with journalistic interviewing than with any other form of interviewing. Most of us are probably somewhat familiar with the clinical interview,such as that conducted by physicians and psychologists.In these situations the professional person or interviewer is interested in getting information necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of the person seeking help.Another familiar situation is the job interview.However, very few of us have actually been interviewed personally by the mass media,particularly by television.And yet,we have a vivid acquaintance with the journalistic interview by virtue of our roles as readers,listeners,and viewers.Even so,true understanding of the journalistic interview,especially television interview,requires thoughtful analysis and even study,as this book indicates.
Interview
The importance and focus of the interview in the work of the print and broadcast journalist are
reflected in several books that have been written on the topic .Most of these books,as well as several chapters,mainly in,but not limited to,journalism and broadcasting handbooks and reporting
texts,stress the"how to"aspects of journalistic interviewing rather than the conceptual aspects of the interview,its context,and,implications.Much of the"how to"material is based on personal experiences and general impressions.As we know,in journalism as in other fields,much can be learned from the systematic study of professional practice.Such study brings together evidence from which broad generalized principles can be developed.
There is,as has been suggested,a growing body of research literature in journalism and
broadcasting,but very little significant attention has been devoted to the study of the interview itself. On the other hand,many general texts as well as numerous research articles on interviewing
in fields other than journalism have been written.Many of these books and articles present the
theoretical and empirical aspects of the interview as well as the training of the interviewers.Unhappily,this plentiful general literature about interviewing pays little attention to the journalistic
interview seems to be surprising for two reasons.First,it seems likely that most people in modern Western societies are more familiar,at least in a positive manner,with journalistic interviewing than with any other form of interviewing. Most of us are probably somewhat familiar with the clinical interview,such as that conducted by physicians and psychologists.In these situations the professional person or interviewer is interested in getting information necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of the person seeking help.Another familiar situation is the job interview.However, very few of us have actually been interviewed personally by the mass media,particularly by television.And yet,we have a vivid acquaintance with the journalistic interview by virtue of our roles as readers,listeners,and viewers.Even so,true understanding of the journalistic interview,especially television interview,requires thoughtful analysis and even study,as this book indicates.
Much research has been done on interviews in general,so the training of journalistic inter- viewers has likewise been strengthened.
A: Right
B: Wrong
C: Not mentioned
A: Right
B: Wrong
C: Not mentioned
参考解析
解析：第一段中谈到，过去有许多新闻采访的书籍主要强调采访的方法，忽略了对采访工作本身及其内涵的研究，所以作者在本段最后两句中指出，应对新闻采访的专业内容进行系统的研究，并认为该研究可以收集材料制定新闻采访的基本原则。由此可见，题干的说法是正确的。
选B的依据是第二段第四句话：" Unhappily , this plentiful general literature about interviewing pays little attention to the journalistic interview seems to be surprising for two rea-Sons.”原文中说新闻采访不注重记者采访，与题目的意思正好相反，因此题干的说法是错误的。
选A的依据是第二段倒数第三句："However, very few of us have actually been interviewed personally by the mass media, particularly by television.”西方人虽然熟悉记者采访，但是很少有人被采访过。题目与原文表达的意思是一致的，因此，题干的说法是正确的。
显然患者就是临床问诊中心的被问者，因而题干的说法是正确的。
本文第一句："...in several books that have been written on the topic”及最后一句中的“...as this book indicates”可以看出，本文很可能是一本书的序言，而不是新闻采访。
本文主要讲journalistic interview，没有讲要注意临床问诊中心的询问。
选B的依据是文章倒数第一句："Even so, true understanding of the journalistic interview,especially television interview,requires thoughtful analysis and even study,as this book indicates.”原文中说尤其在电视采访中更需要深思熟虑的分析，正好与题干表达的意思相反，因而题干的说法是错误的。
选B的依据是第二段第四句话：" Unhappily , this plentiful general literature about interviewing pays little attention to the journalistic interview seems to be surprising for two rea-Sons.”原文中说新闻采访不注重记者采访，与题目的意思正好相反，因此题干的说法是错误的。
选A的依据是第二段倒数第三句："However, very few of us have actually been interviewed personally by the mass media, particularly by television.”西方人虽然熟悉记者采访，但是很少有人被采访过。题目与原文表达的意思是一致的，因此，题干的说法是正确的。
显然患者就是临床问诊中心的被问者，因而题干的说法是正确的。
本文第一句："...in several books that have been written on the topic”及最后一句中的“...as this book indicates”可以看出，本文很可能是一本书的序言，而不是新闻采访。
本文主要讲journalistic interview，没有讲要注意临床问诊中心的询问。
选B的依据是文章倒数第一句："Even so, true understanding of the journalistic interview,especially television interview,requires thoughtful analysis and even study,as this book indicates.”原文中说尤其在电视采访中更需要深思熟虑的分析，正好与题干表达的意思相反，因而题干的说法是错误的。