The information commissioner gave Facebook a rap over the knuckles earlier this month,putting the company on notice of likely fines-the equivalent of a few minutes'revenue-for breaches of privacy.On Wednesday the European commission gave Google a vigorous correction,fining it￠4.3 billion for abusing its market dominance with the AndrOJd operating system which powers the overwhelming majority of the world's mobile phones.Google is appealing.The billions of euros at stake aside,it is easy to see why.Google gives most of Android away,not only to the consumers who use it,but to the companies that build their phones around it.As the company points out,there are more than 24,000 competing Android phones available today,from 1,300 companies.How can that possibly constitute a harmful monopoly?Besides,Google has real competition in the smartphone world from Apple.At the same time,these are exactly the factors that make the commission's decision so interesLing and significant.For Google's business to work,it must become as easy as possible for advertisers to reach users.That is the purpose of all the software that Google gives away,from the Android operating system,through to YouTube,Google search on phones and the Chrome browser.This might look like a cross-subsidy,but on the other hand it is the heart of the company's business.The software that Google gives away is not designed to make a profit on its own.This free version does not include the bits that make a phone useful for anything but making telephone calls,and this was the weak spot in Google's defence.None of the enticements-the mail,the search,the maps and the browser-are included.These can only be used with a proprietary chunk of software that Google controls;and manufacturers who want to use the Play store and 11 crucial Google apps must agree not to build so much as a single phone that does not include them.It is all or nothing.This licensing trick is the way in which Google has undoubtedly limited competition.The commission's decision to punish it probably comes too late to undo the damage it has done.All digital businesses tend towards a monopoly,and this is in part because in some important ways they benefit consumers more the larger they grow.Yet as customers we pay for this in other ways and as citizens even more so,not least because the companies fattened by monopoly profits grow too large to fail and too powerful to challenge.There is a public interest in preventing any company from acquiring almost unlimited power.Regulation defends democracy.The phrase"a rap over the knuckles"（I.ine l.Para.1）is closest in meaning toA.a not-very-severe punishment.B.a nol-very-correci explanaiion.C.a heavy fine.D.a false charge.
The information commissioner gave Facebook a rap over the knuckles earlier this month,putting the company on notice of likely fines-the equivalent of a few minutes'revenue-for breaches of privacy.On Wednesday the European commission gave Google a vigorous correction,fining it￠4.3 billion for abusing its market dominance with the AndrOJd operating system which powers the overwhelming majority of the world's mobile phones.Google is appealing.The billions of euros at stake aside,it is easy to see why.Google gives most of Android away,not only to the consumers who use it,but to the companies that build their phones around it.As the company points out,there are more than 24,000 competing Android phones available today,from 1,300 companies.How can that possibly constitute a harmful monopoly?Besides,Google has real competition in the smartphone world from Apple.At the same time,these are exactly the factors that make the commission's decision so interesLing and significant.For Google's business to work,it must become as easy as possible for advertisers to reach users.That is the purpose of all the software that Google gives away,from the Android operating system,through to YouTube,Google search on phones and the Chrome browser.This might look like a cross-subsidy,but on the other hand it is the heart of the company's business.The software that Google gives away is not designed to make a profit on its own.This free version does not include the bits that make a phone useful for anything but making telephone calls,and this was the weak spot in Google's defence.None of the enticements-the mail,the search,the maps and the browser-are included.These can only be used with a proprietary chunk of software that Google controls;and manufacturers who want to use the Play store and 11 crucial Google apps must agree not to build so much as a single phone that does not include them.It is all or nothing.This licensing trick is the way in which Google has undoubtedly limited competition.The commission's decision to punish it probably comes too late to undo the damage it has done.All digital businesses tend towards a monopoly,and this is in part because in some important ways they benefit consumers more the larger they grow.Yet as customers we pay for this in other ways and as citizens even more so,not least because the companies fattened by monopoly profits grow too large to fail and too powerful to challenge.There is a public interest in preventing any company from acquiring almost unlimited power.Regulation defends democracy.
The phrase"a rap over the knuckles"（I.ine l.Para.1）is closest in meaning to
The phrase"a rap over the knuckles"（I.ine l.Para.1）is closest in meaning to
A.a not-very-severe punishment.
B.a nol-very-correci explanaiion.
C.a heavy fine.
D.a false charge.
B.a nol-very-correci explanaiion.
C.a heavy fine.
D.a false charge.
参考解析
解析：第一段①②句结构均为“主干十伴随状语”，主干中的关键信息可依靠起补充说明作用的状语推出。①句状语指出；信息专员警告脸书因侵犯隐私可能面临罚款（likely fines）（暗含“罚单实际并未开出”之意）；②句通过具体罚款数额介绍谷歌被严惩（a vigorous correction）的事实。结合两句可推知脸书受到处罚比谷歌轻，且实际并未被开出罚单．A.a not-very-severe punishment最为接近所考词a rap over the knuckles的含义。[解题技巧]B.按字面意思理解②句的correction，并错误推导出①句是“委员作出了不太正确的解释”．②句是“委员会提出了修正”。但两句话涉及的对象并非同一家公司，照此理解不合逻辑。C.源自②句“罚款43亿欧元”，但这是对谷歌而非脸书的处罚。D.同样曲解了correction的含义，臆断出处罚谷歌”正确”，指控脸书“错误”。注：文中correction为熟词辟义，意为“处罚，惩罚”，根据上下文可推知此义。
相关考题：
( ) the project one month earlier, they burst into a big laughter. A、AccomplishedB、Being accomplishedC、AccomplishingD、Having accomplished
A few months earlier I had been putting the finishing touches on portraits I had painted of each of my parents.
A company implements video conferencing over IP on their Ethernet LAN. The users notice that the network slows down, and the video either stutters or fails completely. What is the most likely reason for this?（）A.minimum cell rate (MCR)B.quality of service (QoS)C.modulationD.packet switching exchange (PSE)E.reliable transport protocol (RTP)
It would be all too easy to say that Facebook’s market meltdown is coming to an end.After all,Mark Zuckerberg’s socialnetwork burned as much as$50 billion of shareholders’wealth in just a couple months.To put that in context,since its debut(初次登台)on NASDAQ in May,Facebook has lost value nearly equal to Yahoo,AOL,Zynga,Yelp,Pandora,Open Table,Group on,LinkedIn,and Angie's List combined,plus that of the bulk of the publicly traded newspaper industry:As shocking as this utter failure may be to the nearly 1 billion faithful Facebook users around the world,it’s no surprise toanyone who read the initial public offering(IPO)prospectus(首次公开募股说明书).Worse still,all the crises that emergedwhen the company debuted-overpriced shares,poor corporate governance,huge challenges to the core business,and adamaged brand-remain today.Facebook looks like a prime example of what Wall Street calls a falling knife-that is,one thatcan cost investors their fingers if they try to catch it.Start with the valuation.To justify a stock price close to the lower end of the projected range in the IPO,say$28 a share,Facebook’s future growth would have needed to match that of Google seven years earlier.That would have requiredincreasing revenue by some 80 percent annually and maintaining high profit margins all the while.That’s not happening.In the first half of 2012,Facebook reported revenue of$2.24 billion,up 38 percent from the sameperiod in 2011.At the same time,the company’s costs surged to$2.6 billion in the six-month period.This so-so performance reflects the Achilles’heel of Facebook’s business model,which the company clearly stated in alist of risk factors associated with its IPO:it hasn’t yet figured out how to advertise effectively on mobile devices,The numberof Facebook users accessing the site on their phones surged by 67 percent to 543 million in the last quarter,or more thanhalf its customer base.Numbers are only part of the problem.The mounting pile of failure creates a negative feedback loop that threatens Facebook’s future in other ways.Indeed,the more Facebook’s disappointment in the market is catalogued,the worse Facebook’simage becomes.Not only does that threaten to rub off on users,it’s bad for recruitment and retention of talented hackers,who are the lifeblood of Zuckerberg’s creation.Yet the brilliant CEO can ignore the sadness and complaints of his shareholders thanks to the super-voting stock heholds.This arrangement also was fully disclosed at the time of the offering.It’s a pity so few investors apparently bothered todo their homework.It can be inferred from the context that the“Achilles’heel”(Line 1,Para.5)refers to____《》（）A.deadly weaknessB.problem unsolveDC.indisputable factD.potential risk
It would be all too easy to say that Facebook’s market meltdown is coming to an end.After all,Mark Zuckerberg’s socialnetwork burned as much as$50 billion of shareholders’wealth in just a couple months.To put that in context,since its debut(初次登台)on NASDAQ in May,Facebook has lost value nearly equal to Yahoo,AOL,Zynga,Yelp,Pandora,Open Table,Group on,LinkedIn,and Angie's List combined,plus that of the bulk of the publicly traded newspaper industry:As shocking as this utter failure may be to the nearly 1 billion faithful Facebook users around the world,it’s no surprise toanyone who read the initial public offering(IPO)prospectus(首次公开募股说明书).Worse still,all the crises that emergedwhen the company debuted-overpriced shares,poor corporate governance,huge challenges to the core business,and adamaged brand-remain today.Facebook looks like a prime example of what Wall Street calls a falling knife-that is,one thatcan cost investors their fingers if they try to catch it.Start with the valuation.To justify a stock price close to the lower end of the projected range in the IPO,say$28 a share,Facebook’s future growth would have needed to match that of Google seven years earlier.That would have requiredincreasing revenue by some 80 percent annually and maintaining high profit margins all the while.That’s not happening.In the first half of 2012,Facebook reported revenue of$2.24 billion,up 38 percent from the sameperiod in 2011.At the same time,the company’s costs surged to$2.6 billion in the six-month period.This so-so performance reflects the Achilles’heel of Facebook’s business model,which the company clearly stated in alist of risk factors associated with its IPO:it hasn’t yet figured out how to advertise effectively on mobile devices,The numberof Facebook users accessing the site on their phones surged by 67 percent to 543 million in the last quarter,or more thanhalf its customer base.Numbers are only part of the problem.The mounting pile of failure creates a negative feedback loop that threatens Facebook’s future in other ways.Indeed,the more Facebook’s disappointment in the market is catalogued,the worse Facebook’simage becomes.Not only does that threaten to rub off on users,it’s bad for recruitment and retention of talented hackers,who are the lifeblood of Zuckerberg’s creation.Yet the brilliant CEO can ignore the sadness and complaints of his shareholders thanks to the super-voting stock heholds.This arrangement also was fully disclosed at the time of the offering.It’s a pity so few investors apparently bothered todo their homework.What can be inferred about Facebook from the first paragraph 《》（）A.Its market meltdown has been easily halted.B.It has increased trade with the newspaper industry.C.It has encountered utter failure since its stock debut.D.Its shareholders have invested$50 billion in a social network.
It would be all too easy to say that Facebook’s market meltdown is coming to an end.After all,Mark Zuckerberg’s socialnetwork burned as much as$50 billion of shareholders’wealth in just a couple months.To put that in context,since its debut(初次登台)on NASDAQ in May,Facebook has lost value nearly equal to Yahoo,AOL,Zynga,Yelp,Pandora,Open Table,Group on,LinkedIn,and Angie's List combined,plus that of the bulk of the publicly traded newspaper industry:As shocking as this utter failure may be to the nearly 1 billion faithful Facebook users around the world,it’s no surprise toanyone who read the initial public offering(IPO)prospectus(首次公开募股说明书).Worse still,all the crises that emergedwhen the company debuted-overpriced shares,poor corporate governance,huge challenges to the core business,and adamaged brand-remain today.Facebook looks like a prime example of what Wall Street calls a falling knife-that is,one thatcan cost investors their fingers if they try to catch it.Start with the valuation.To justify a stock price close to the lower end of the projected range in the IPO,say$28 a share,Facebook’s future growth would have needed to match that of Google seven years earlier.That would have requiredincreasing revenue by some 80 percent annually and maintaining high profit margins all the while.That’s not happening.In the first half of 2012,Facebook reported revenue of$2.24 billion,up 38 percent from the sameperiod in 2011.At the same time,the company’s costs surged to$2.6 billion in the six-month period.This so-so performance reflects the Achilles’heel of Facebook’s business model,which the company clearly stated in alist of risk factors associated with its IPO:it hasn’t yet figured out how to advertise effectively on mobile devices,The numberof Facebook users accessing the site on their phones surged by 67 percent to 543 million in the last quarter,or more thanhalf its customer base.Numbers are only part of the problem.The mounting pile of failure creates a negative feedback loop that threatens Facebook’s future in other ways.Indeed,the more Facebook’s disappointment in the market is catalogued,the worse Facebook’simage becomes.Not only does that threaten to rub off on users,it’s bad for recruitment and retention of talented hackers,who are the lifeblood of Zuckerberg’s creation.Yet the brilliant CEO can ignore the sadness and complaints of his shareholders thanks to the super-voting stock heholds.This arrangement also was fully disclosed at the time of the offering.It’s a pity so few investors apparently bothered todo their homework.What effect will Facebook’s failure in the market have 《》（）A.Its users’benefits will be threatened.B.Talented hackers will take down the website.C.The CEO will hold the super-voting stock.D.The company’s innovation strength will be damageD.
It would be all too easy to say that Facebook’s market meltdown is coming to an end.After all,Mark Zuckerberg’s socialnetwork burned as much as$50 billion of shareholders’wealth in just a couple months.To put that in context,since its debut(初次登台)on NASDAQ in May,Facebook has lost value nearly equal to Yahoo,AOL,Zynga,Yelp,Pandora,Open Table,Group on,LinkedIn,and Angie's List combined,plus that of the bulk of the publicly traded newspaper industry:As shocking as this utter failure may be to the nearly 1 billion faithful Facebook users around the world,it’s no surprise toanyone who read the initial public offering(IPO)prospectus(首次公开募股说明书).Worse still,all the crises that emergedwhen the company debuted-overpriced shares,poor corporate governance,huge challenges to the core business,and adamaged brand-remain today.Facebook looks like a prime example of what Wall Street calls a falling knife-that is,one thatcan cost investors their fingers if they try to catch it.Start with the valuation.To justify a stock price close to the lower end of the projected range in the IPO,say$28 a share,Facebook’s future growth would have needed to match that of Google seven years earlier.That would have requiredincreasing revenue by some 80 percent annually and maintaining high profit margins all the while.That’s not happening.In the first half of 2012,Facebook reported revenue of$2.24 billion,up 38 percent from the sameperiod in 2011.At the same time,the company’s costs surged to$2.6 billion in the six-month period.This so-so performance reflects the Achilles’heel of Facebook’s business model,which the company clearly stated in alist of risk factors associated with its IPO:it hasn’t yet figured out how to advertise effectively on mobile devices,The numberof Facebook users accessing the site on their phones surged by 67 percent to 543 million in the last quarter,or more thanhalf its customer base.Numbers are only part of the problem.The mounting pile of failure creates a negative feedback loop that threatens Facebook’s future in other ways.Indeed,the more Facebook’s disappointment in the market is catalogued,the worse Facebook’simage becomes.Not only does that threaten to rub off on users,it’s bad for recruitment and retention of talented hackers,who are the lifeblood of Zuckerberg’s creation.Yet the brilliant CEO can ignore the sadness and complaints of his shareholders thanks to the super-voting stock heholds.This arrangement also was fully disclosed at the time of the offering.It’s a pity so few investors apparently bothered todo their homework.What does the author imply in the last paragraph 《》（）A.Sleeplessness does harm to people’s health.B.Few people really know the importance of sleep.C.It is important to study our sleep patterns.D.Average people probably sleep less than the rich.
It would be all too easy to say that Facebook’s market meltdown is coming to an end.After all,Mark Zuckerberg’s socialnetwork burned as much as$50 billion of shareholders’wealth in just a couple months.To put that in context,since its debut(初次登台)on NASDAQ in May,Facebook has lost value nearly equal to Yahoo,AOL,Zynga,Yelp,Pandora,Open Table,Group on,LinkedIn,and Angie's List combined,plus that of the bulk of the publicly traded newspaper industry:As shocking as this utter failure may be to the nearly 1 billion faithful Facebook users around the world,it’s no surprise toanyone who read the initial public offering(IPO)prospectus(首次公开募股说明书).Worse still,all the crises that emergedwhen the company debuted-overpriced shares,poor corporate governance,huge challenges to the core business,and adamaged brand-remain today.Facebook looks like a prime example of what Wall Street calls a falling knife-that is,one thatcan cost investors their fingers if they try to catch it.Start with the valuation.To justify a stock price close to the lower end of the projected range in the IPO,say$28 a share,Facebook’s future growth would have needed to match that of Google seven years earlier.That would have requiredincreasing revenue by some 80 percent annually and maintaining high profit margins all the while.That’s not happening.In the first half of 2012,Facebook reported revenue of$2.24 billion,up 38 percent from the sameperiod in 2011.At the same time,the company’s costs surged to$2.6 billion in the six-month period.This so-so performance reflects the Achilles’heel of Facebook’s business model,which the company clearly stated in alist of risk factors associated with its IPO:it hasn’t yet figured out how to advertise effectively on mobile devices,The numberof Facebook users accessing the site on their phones surged by 67 percent to 543 million in the last quarter,or more thanhalf its customer base.Numbers are only part of the problem.The mounting pile of failure creates a negative feedback loop that threatens Facebook’s future in other ways.Indeed,the more Facebook’s disappointment in the market is catalogued,the worse Facebook’simage becomes.Not only does that threaten to rub off on users,it’s bad for recruitment and retention of talented hackers,who are the lifeblood of Zuckerberg’s creation.Yet the brilliant CEO can ignore the sadness and complaints of his shareholders thanks to the super-voting stock heholds.This arrangement also was fully disclosed at the time of the offering.It’s a pity so few investors apparently bothered todo their homework.To make its stock price reasonable,Facebook has to____《》（）A.narrow the IPO price rangeB.cooperate with GoogleC.keep enormously profitableD.invest additional$2.6 billion
The information commissioner gave Facebook a rap over the knuckles earlier this month,putting the company on notice of likely fines-the equivalent of a few minutes'revenue-for breaches of privacy.On Wednesday the European commission gave Google a vigorous correction,fining it￠4.3 billion for abusing its market dominance with the AndrOJd operating system which powers the overwhelming majority of the world's mobile phones.Google is appealing.The billions of euros at stake aside,it is easy to see why.Google gives most of Android away,not only to the consumers who use it,but to the companies that build their phones around it.As the company points out,there are more than 24,000 competing Android phones available today,from 1,300 companies.How can that possibly constitute a harmful monopoly?Besides,Google has real competition in the smartphone world from Apple.At the same time,these are exactly the factors that make the commission's decision so interesLing and significant.For Google's business to work,it must become as easy as possible for advertisers to reach users.That is the purpose of all the software that Google gives away,from the Android operating system,through to YouTube,Google search on phones and the Chrome browser.This might look like a cross-subsidy,but on the other hand it is the heart of the company's business.The software that Google gives away is not designed to make a profit on its own.This free version does not include the bits that make a phone useful for anything but making telephone calls,and this was the weak spot in Google's defence.None of the enticements-the mail,the search,the maps and the browser-are included.These can only be used with a proprietary chunk of software that Google controls;and manufacturers who want to use the Play store and 11 crucial Google apps must agree not to build so much as a single phone that does not include them.It is all or nothing.This licensing trick is the way in which Google has undoubtedly limited competition.The commission's decision to punish it probably comes too late to undo the damage it has done.All digital businesses tend towards a monopoly,and this is in part because in some important ways they benefit consumers more the larger they grow.Yet as customers we pay for this in other ways and as citizens even more so,not least because the companies fattened by monopoly profits grow too large to fail and too powerful to challenge.There is a public interest in preventing any company from acquiring almost unlimited power.Regulation defends democracy.The author's attitude toward the commcssion's decision isA.cautious.B.ambiguous.C.sarcastic.D.supportive.
The information commissioner gave Facebook a rap over the knuckles earlier this month,putting the company on notice of likely fines-the equivalent of a few minutes'revenue-for breaches of privacy.On Wednesday the European commission gave Google a vigorous correction,fining it￠4.3 billion for abusing its market dominance with the AndrOJd operating system which powers the overwhelming majority of the world's mobile phones.Google is appealing.The billions of euros at stake aside,it is easy to see why.Google gives most of Android away,not only to the consumers who use it,but to the companies that build their phones around it.As the company points out,there are more than 24,000 competing Android phones available today,from 1,300 companies.How can that possibly constitute a harmful monopoly?Besides,Google has real competition in the smartphone world from Apple.At the same time,these are exactly the factors that make the commission's decision so interesLing and significant.For Google's business to work,it must become as easy as possible for advertisers to reach users.That is the purpose of all the software that Google gives away,from the Android operating system,through to YouTube,Google search on phones and the Chrome browser.This might look like a cross-subsidy,but on the other hand it is the heart of the company's business.The software that Google gives away is not designed to make a profit on its own.This free version does not include the bits that make a phone useful for anything but making telephone calls,and this was the weak spot in Google's defence.None of the enticements-the mail,the search,the maps and the browser-are included.These can only be used with a proprietary chunk of software that Google controls;and manufacturers who want to use the Play store and 11 crucial Google apps must agree not to build so much as a single phone that does not include them.It is all or nothing.This licensing trick is the way in which Google has undoubtedly limited competition.The commission's decision to punish it probably comes too late to undo the damage it has done.All digital businesses tend towards a monopoly,and this is in part because in some important ways they benefit consumers more the larger they grow.Yet as customers we pay for this in other ways and as citizens even more so,not least because the companies fattened by monopoly profits grow too large to fail and too powerful to challenge.There is a public interest in preventing any company from acquiring almost unlimited power.Regulation defends democracy.In responding to the commission's decision,Google argues thatA.the fine is too heavy Ior the company to pay.B.the smartphone market is highly competitive.C.the company ought to control most of Android.D.Apple is more likely to constitute a monopoly.
Text 2 Should we be thinking of Facebook as a news site?Is that how Facebook thinks of itself?No,not primarily,Facebook now says.In a document posted on Wednesday,the company explained,for the first time,the"values"that govem its news feed,the scrolling list of posts that Facebook presents to its l.65 billion users every time they log on.Though it is couched in the anodyne language of a corporate news release,the document's message should come as a shock to everyone in the media business.According to these values,Facebook has a single overriding purpose,and it isn't news.Facebook is mainly for telling you what's up with your friends and family.Adam Mosseri,the Facebook manager in charge of the news feed,said in a recent interview that informing and entertaining users was also part of the company's mission.But he made clear that news and entertainment were secondary pursuits."We think more,spend more time and work on more projects that try to help people express themselves with their friends or learn about their friends or have conversations with their friends,"he said.As if to underscore the point,the company is making a tweak to its news feed ranking system to increase the prominence ofcoiitent from your friends and family over posts by news companies and other organizations.It is also waming news companies that their traffic might decline as a result of the change.These moves highlight a truth that tends to get lost in commentary about the social network's influence over the news:At Facebook,infonrung users about the world will always take a back seat to cute pictures of babies..Because Facebook does not think ofitself primarily as a news company,it seems to want us to stop expecting it to act like one.Whether we should,though,is a more complicated matter.The company has long been hounded by journalists and activists over its power to shape the news through its algorithms,or the code that determines which stories you see,in the news feed.The question of how to think about Facebook's role in the news-and whether we should demand the same standards of accuracy,objectivity,transparency and fairness that we expect from traditional outlets-may be the primary puzzle ofour new media age.According to Facebook,the values outlined in the document have been the informal governing philosophy of its news feed since it was started a decade ago,and Mr.Zuckerberg and Chris Cox,Facebook's chiefproduct officer,were deeply involved in drafiing the new document.30.The best title for this text could be.A.Facebook-a News Giant That Would Rather Show Us Baby PicturesB.Facebook Is Reluctant to Be a News WebsiteC.Facebook,a New Bom Baby in the Age oflntemetD.Facebook's Mr.Zuckerberg and Chris Cox
Text 2 Should we be thinking of Facebook as a news site?Is that how Facebook thinks of itself?No,not primarily,Facebook now says.In a document posted on Wednesday,the company explained,for the first time,the"values"that govem its news feed,the scrolling list of posts that Facebook presents to its l.65 billion users every time they log on.Though it is couched in the anodyne language of a corporate news release,the document's message should come as a shock to everyone in the media business.According to these values,Facebook has a single overriding purpose,and it isn't news.Facebook is mainly for telling you what's up with your friends and family.Adam Mosseri,the Facebook manager in charge of the news feed,said in a recent interview that informing and entertaining users was also part of the company's mission.But he made clear that news and entertainment were secondary pursuits."We think more,spend more time and work on more projects that try to help people express themselves with their friends or learn about their friends or have conversations with their friends,"he said.As if to underscore the point,the company is making a tweak to its news feed ranking system to increase the prominence ofcoiitent from your friends and family over posts by news companies and other organizations.It is also waming news companies that their traffic might decline as a result of the change.These moves highlight a truth that tends to get lost in commentary about the social network's influence over the news:At Facebook,infonrung users about the world will always take a back seat to cute pictures of babies..Because Facebook does not think ofitself primarily as a news company,it seems to want us to stop expecting it to act like one.Whether we should,though,is a more complicated matter.The company has long been hounded by journalists and activists over its power to shape the news through its algorithms,or the code that determines which stories you see,in the news feed.The question of how to think about Facebook's role in the news-and whether we should demand the same standards of accuracy,objectivity,transparency and fairness that we expect from traditional outlets-may be the primary puzzle ofour new media age.According to Facebook,the values outlined in the document have been the informal governing philosophy of its news feed since it was started a decade ago,and Mr.Zuckerberg and Chris Cox,Facebook's chiefproduct officer,were deeply involved in drafiing the new document.29.Mr.Zuckerberg and Chris Cox believe that.A.serious news is the most valuable to be posted to their users.B.the standards ofnews they post are accurate and objective.C.they have the conventional governing policy ofits news.D.the intefaction with friends is the most important news.
The information commissioner gave Facebook a rap over the knuckles earlier this month,putting the company on notice of likely fines-the equivalent of a few minutes'revenue-for breaches of privacy.On Wednesday the European commission gave Google a vigorous correction,fining it￠4.3 billion for abusing its market dominance with the AndrOJd operating system which powers the overwhelming majority of the world's mobile phones.Google is appealing.The billions of euros at stake aside,it is easy to see why.Google gives most of Android away,not only to the consumers who use it,but to the companies that build their phones around it.As the company points out,there are more than 24,000 competing Android phones available today,from 1,300 companies.How can that possibly constitute a harmful monopoly?Besides,Google has real competition in the smartphone world from Apple.At the same time,these are exactly the factors that make the commission's decision so interesLing and significant.For Google's business to work,it must become as easy as possible for advertisers to reach users.That is the purpose of all the software that Google gives away,from the Android operating system,through to YouTube,Google search on phones and the Chrome browser.This might look like a cross-subsidy,but on the other hand it is the heart of the company's business.The software that Google gives away is not designed to make a profit on its own.This free version does not include the bits that make a phone useful for anything but making telephone calls,and this was the weak spot in Google's defence.None of the enticements-the mail,the search,the maps and the browser-are included.These can only be used with a proprietary chunk of software that Google controls;and manufacturers who want to use the Play store and 11 crucial Google apps must agree not to build so much as a single phone that does not include them.It is all or nothing.This licensing trick is the way in which Google has undoubtedly limited competition.The commission's decision to punish it probably comes too late to undo the damage it has done.All digital businesses tend towards a monopoly,and this is in part because in some important ways they benefit consumers more the larger they grow.Yet as customers we pay for this in other ways and as citizens even more so,not least because the companies fattened by monopoly profits grow too large to fail and too powerful to challenge.There is a public interest in preventing any company from acquiring almost unlimited power.Regulation defends democracy.Which of the following is true of Google's licensing trick?A.It is of great use to some users,but of little use to others.B.It offers many enticing functions to Android users for free.C.It imposes a restriction on manufacturers'choice of appsD.It may help Google escape punishment from the commission.
Text 2 Should we be thinking of Facebook as a news site?Is that how Facebook thinks of itself?No,not primarily,Facebook now says.In a document posted on Wednesday,the company explained,for the first time,the"values"that govem its news feed,the scrolling list of posts that Facebook presents to its l.65 billion users every time they log on.Though it is couched in the anodyne language of a corporate news release,the document's message should come as a shock to everyone in the media business.According to these values,Facebook has a single overriding purpose,and it isn't news.Facebook is mainly for telling you what's up with your friends and family.Adam Mosseri,the Facebook manager in charge of the news feed,said in a recent interview that informing and entertaining users was also part of the company's mission.But he made clear that news and entertainment were secondary pursuits."We think more,spend more time and work on more projects that try to help people express themselves with their friends or learn about their friends or have conversations with their friends,"he said.As if to underscore the point,the company is making a tweak to its news feed ranking system to increase the prominence ofcoiitent from your friends and family over posts by news companies and other organizations.It is also waming news companies that their traffic might decline as a result of the change.These moves highlight a truth that tends to get lost in commentary about the social network's influence over the news:At Facebook,infonrung users about the world will always take a back seat to cute pictures of babies..Because Facebook does not think ofitself primarily as a news company,it seems to want us to stop expecting it to act like one.Whether we should,though,is a more complicated matter.The company has long been hounded by journalists and activists over its power to shape the news through its algorithms,or the code that determines which stories you see,in the news feed.The question of how to think about Facebook's role in the news-and whether we should demand the same standards of accuracy,objectivity,transparency and fairness that we expect from traditional outlets-may be the primary puzzle ofour new media age.According to Facebook,the values outlined in the document have been the informal governing philosophy of its news feed since it was started a decade ago,and Mr.Zuckerberg and Chris Cox,Facebook's chiefproduct officer,were deeply involved in drafiing the new document.27.By"making a tweak",Facebook means to.A.adjust the ranking system of the different news.B.give priority to news about friends and family.C.solve the traffic problem online.D.wam media companies to change their organizations.
The CEO of the company has been consistent ________ his policy associated with foreign investments over the last few years.A.of B.with C.at D.for
Following a widespread dispute over wages, both parties involved__________ came to an agreement to end the three-month walkout, as the company offered higher wages and job guarantees.A. equally B. finallyC. annually D. increasingly
共用题干1.Tired of social networking?Logging off Facebook?You're probably not the only one.Fearing for their privacy or perhaps just bored with using the site,100,000 Britons are said to have deactivated（注销）their accounts last month. And Facebook fatigue seems to be catching. Six million logged off for good in the U.S.too,figures show.Worldwide,the rate of growth has slowed for a second month in a row一and as it aims to reach its goal of one billion active users,Facebook is having to rely on developing countries to boost its numbers.The figures suggest that there could be a"natural limit" for Facebook's saturation（饱和）.There is even speculation on blogs that, as is feared for its failing rival MySpace,the website could one day "pass into oblivion"（被人遗忘）.2.Earlier this year,executives announced that the number of Facebook accounts held in the UK had reached 30 million,accounting for about half the population.The milestone was an increase of four million from last July and represented the highest saturation of any country in Europe.3.But times change一and last month more than 100,000 in the UK stopped using the website, figures show.In the U.S.,user numbers dropped from 155.2 million to 149.4 million throughout May.In Canada there was also a fall,of about 1.5 million users,while in Russia and Norway num-bers also fell by more than 100,000 users.4.It's not all bad news for the site.Worldwide,Facebook is still expanding and has around 600 million users,thanks to strong growth in countries such as Mexico and Brazil.5.According to Eric Eldon,of the website Inside Facebook,which obtained the figures through analysis of the company's advertising tools,there is a point at which the site can no longer grow, once it has established itself in a country."By the time Facebook reaches around 50 percent of the total population in a given country,growth generally slows to a halt,"he explained.Facebook had strong growth in countries such as_________.A:around 50 percent of the total population in a given countryB:highest saturationC:5.8 millionD:Britain,Canada and the U.S.E:fear for privacy or perhaps just being bored with using the siteF:Mexico and Brazil
共用题干1.Tired of social networking?Logging off Facebook?You're probably not the only one.Fearing for their privacy or perhaps just bored with using the site,100,000 Britons are said to have deactivated（注销）their accounts last month. And Facebook fatigue seems to be catching. Six million logged off for good in the U.S.too,figures show.Worldwide,the rate of growth has slowed for a second month in a row一and as it aims to reach its goal of one billion active users,Facebook is having to rely on developing countries to boost its numbers.The figures suggest that there could be a"natural limit" for Facebook's saturation（饱和）.There is even speculation on blogs that, as is feared for its failing rival MySpace,the website could one day "pass into oblivion"（被人遗忘）.2.Earlier this year,executives announced that the number of Facebook accounts held in the UK had reached 30 million,accounting for about half the population.The milestone was an increase of four million from last July and represented the highest saturation of any country in Europe.3.But times change一and last month more than 100,000 in the UK stopped using the website, figures show.In the U.S.,user numbers dropped from 155.2 million to 149.4 million throughout May.In Canada there was also a fall,of about 1.5 million users,while in Russia and Norway num-bers also fell by more than 100,000 users.4.It's not all bad news for the site.Worldwide,Facebook is still expanding and has around 600 million users,thanks to strong growth in countries such as Mexico and Brazil.5.According to Eric Eldon,of the website Inside Facebook,which obtained the figures through analysis of the company's advertising tools,there is a point at which the site can no longer grow, once it has established itself in a country."By the time Facebook reaches around 50 percent of the total population in a given country,growth generally slows to a halt,"he explained.Paragraph 1_________A:Facebook users in Britain increased a lot earlier this year.B:Facebook seems to be faced with a gloomy future.C:Facebook is a very popular social place for many people.D:Users of Facebook dropped dramatically in many countries.E:In spite of the setback in some countries,Facebook is still expanding worldwide. F: There is a reason for the decreasing users of Facebook.
An administrator was asked to log information on possible security breaches on a server. To which file should additional entries be added to capture this information（）A、/var/adm/sulogB、/etc/syslog.confC、/etc/security/sysck.cfgD、/etc/security/syslog.conf
问答题Practice 2 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The table below summarizes some data collected by a college bookshop for the month of February 1998. Write a report describing the sales figures of various types of publications, based on the information shown in the table. Write at least 150 words.
单选题You work as the enterprise exchange administrator at Company.com.The Company.com network consists of a single Active Directory domain named Company.com.Company.com has an Exchange Server 2010 organization.During a routine monitoring， you notice that e-mail messages going to the Internet encompasses internal Exchange routing information in the message header.The Company.com CIO does not want that information to be sent to their clients. What should you do？（）AThe best option is to set up a new remote domain.BThe best option is to change the permissions of the Send connector.CThe best option is to change the properties of the sender reputation feature.DThe best option is to enable domain security on the default Receive connector.
单选题A company implements video conferencing over IP on their Ethernet LAN. The users notice that the network slows down, and the video either stutters or fails completely. What is the most likely reason for this?（）Aminimum cell rate (MCR)Bquality of service (QoS)CmodulationDpacket switching exchange (PSE)Ereliable transport protocol (RTP)
单选题In order to increase revenues, a cellphone company has decided to change its fee structure. Instead of charging a flat rate of $20 per month and $0.05 for every minute over 200 minutes, the company will now charge $50 per month for unlimited usage. Which of the following is a consideration that, if true, suggests that the new plan will not actually increase the company’s revenues?AA rival company, which charges no start-up fee, offers an unlimited calling plan for $40 per month.BTwo-thirds of the company’s customers use less than 500 minutes per month.CStudies have shown that customers using unlimited calling plans will increase their monthly usage of minutes by over 50 percent.DOne-fifth of the company’s customers use in excess of 1,000 minutes per month.EIn recent months the company has received several complaints of insufficient signal strength and poor customer service.
单选题According to Schwarz's findings, who are more likely to get diabetes later in life?AThose mothers who had never breastfed.BThose mothers who never gave birth.CThose mothers who breastfed for a month.DThose mothers who breastfed for six months.