DScience can't explain the power of pets, but many studies have shown that the company of pets can help lower blood pressure (血压) and raise chances of recovering from a heart attack, reduce loneliness and spread all-round good cheer. Any owner will tall you how much joy a pet brings. For some, an animal provides more comfort than a husband/wife. A 2002 study by Karen Allen of the State University of New York measured stress (紧张) levels and blood pressure in people - half of them pet owners –while they performed 5 minutes of mental arithmetic (算术) or held a hand in ice water. Subjects completed the tasks alone, with a husband/wife, a close friend or with a pet. People with pets did it best. Those tested with their ani mal friends had smaller change in blood pressure and returned most quickly to baseline heart rates. With pets in the room, people also made fewer math mistakes than when doing in front of other companions. It seems people feel more relaxed (放松)around pets, says Allen, who thinks it may be because pets don't judge. A study reported last fall suggests that having a pet dog not only raises your spirits but may also have an effect on your eating habits. Researchers at Northwestern Memorial Hospital spent a year studying 36 fat people and their equally fat dogs on diet-and-exercise programs; a separate group of 56 people without pets were put on a diet program. On average, people lost about I1 pounds, or 5% of their body weight. Their dogs did even better, losing an average of 12 pounds, more than 15% of their body weight. Dog owners didn't lose any more weight than those without dogs but, say researchers, got more exercise overall-mostly with their dogs - and found it worth doing.67.What does the text mainly discuss?A.What pets bring to their owners.B.How pets help people calm down.C.People's opinions of keeping pets.D.Pet's value in medical research.

D

Science can't explain the power of pets, but many studies have shown that the company of pets can help lower blood pressure (血压) and raise chances of recovering from a heart attack, reduce loneliness and spread all-round good cheer. Any owner will tall you how much joy a pet brings. For some, an animal provides more comfort than a husband/wife. A 2002 study by Karen Allen of the State University of New York measured stress (紧张) levels and blood pressure in people - half of them pet owners –while they performed 5 minutes of mental arithmetic (算术) or held a hand in ice water. Subjects completed the tasks alone, with a husband/wife, a close friend or with a pet. People with pets did it best. Those tested with their ani mal friends had smaller change in blood pressure and returned most quickly to baseline heart rates. With pets in the room, people also made fewer math mistakes than when doing in front of other companions. It seems people feel more relaxed (放松)around pets, says Allen, who thinks it may be because pets don't judge. A study reported last fall suggests that having a pet dog not only raises your spirits but may also have an effect on your eating habits. Researchers at Northwestern Memorial Hospital spent a year studying 36 fat people and their equally fat dogs on diet-and-exercise programs; a separate group of 56 people without pets were put on a diet program. On average, people lost about I1 pounds, or 5% of their body weight. Their dogs did even better, losing an average of 12 pounds, more than 15% of their body weight. Dog owners didn't lose any more weight than those without dogs but, say researchers, got more exercise overall-mostly with their dogs - and found it worth doing.

67.What does the text mainly discuss?

A.What pets bring to their owners.

B.How pets help people calm down.

C.People's opinions of keeping pets.

D.Pet's value in medical research.


相关考题:

Leading a dog’s life in America isn’t such a bad thing. Many grocery stores sell pet foods to owners eager to please their pets. In Houston, Texas, dogs can have their dinner delivered to their homes, just like pizza. Well-to-do canines can attend doggy daycare centers while their owners work. Pets can even accompany their owners on vacation. Fancy hotels are beginning to accommodate both man and beast. Furry guests in hotels can enjoy gourmet meals served on fine china and sleep in soft beds.Beneath the furry luxuries, there lies a basic American belief: Pets have a right to be treated well. At least 75 animal welfare organizations exist in America. These provide care and adoption services for homeless and abused animals. Vets can give animals an incredible level of medical care for an incredible price. To pay for the high-tech health care, people can buy health insurance for their pets. And when it’s time to say good -bye, owners can bury their pets in a respectable pet cemetery.The average American enjoys having pets around, and for good reason. Researchers have discovered that interacting with animals lowers a person’s blood pressure. Dogs can offer protection from burglars and unwelcome visitors. Cats can help rid the home of unwanted pests. Little creatures of all shapes and sizes can provide companionship and love. In many cases, having a pet prepares a young couple for the responsibilities of parenthood. Pets even encourage social relationships: They give their owners an appearance of friendliness, and they provide a good topic of conversation.Pets are as basic to American culture as hot dogs or apple pies. To Americans, pets are not just property, but a part of the family. After all, pets are people, too.(1)The word “please” in paragraph 1 line 2 means ().A、to make somebody gladB、to make somebody unhappyC、to invite somebodyD、to treat somebody badly(2)The topic sentence in paragraph 2 is ().A、At least 75 animal welfare organizations exist in AmericaB、Vets can give animals an incredible level of medical care for an incredible priceC、To pay for the high-tech health care, people can buy health insurance for their petsD、Beneath the furry luxuries, there lies a basic American belief: Pets have a right to be treated well(3)“When it’s time to say good-bye” in paragraph 2 line 5 means ().A、when the pet says “good-bye” to the hostB、when the host says “good-bye” to the petC、when the pet diesD、when the pet has to leave(4)Paragraph 3 mainly tells us ().A、every American enjoys having petsB、having pets can do people something goodC、dogs and cats are people’s good friendsD、pets do not encourage social relationships(5)The author writes the last paragraph to show ().A、pets are the same as hot dogs and apple piesB、pets are peopleC、pets are just propertyD、pets are important

It's ____ (据说) that many babies have died from melamine (三聚氰胺) in milk power.

What is the main idea of the passage?A. Science and its applications bring us many dangers.B. The development of science mostly lies in people’s attitudes.C. Mankind can largely take control of science with their efforts.D. The future of science will be influenced by the dangerous ideas.

Emotions(情感)like these suggest that a positive spirit still lies behind gift giving. They prove that the anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss was wrong to say that modern western gift giving is highly wasteful. Studies in Canada and elsewhere have also shown that this is not the case. Each gift is unique even if so many are given.The emotional benefit for those who exchange gifts is the very reason for the tradition to continue.

Why did Isaksen advise people not to have foreign pets?A. They attack human beings.B. We need to study native animals.C. They can’t live out of the rain forest.D. We do not know much about them yet.

(ii) Explain why the disclosure of voluntary information in annual reports can enhance the company’saccountability to equity investors. (4 marks)

Have you ever been to the place? You can see many places of interest there.(合并为一句)Have you ever been to the place ________you can see many places of interest?

Recent studies have shown that air inside many homes, office buildings, and schools is full of pollutants such as ().A、chemicalsB、smokeC、bacteriaD、perfume

What are the right reasons to explain why not the guests enjoy the meal? A、because they don't have what they actually wantB、no beautiful young ladies showed upC、steamed fish with all the little bones left inD、too many children making noises

If only it ()so cold, perhaps I, too, ()more initiative.A、had been,have shownB、have been,would showC、had’t been,cound't have shownD、had't been,could have shown

He can’t explain all this.() A.Neither can IB.So can IC.Neither I canD.So I can’t

【T1】A.HANDLEB.ONC.CONTINUED TO A.THE TREND WAS NATURALLY MOST OBVIOUS IN THOSE AREAS OF SCIENCE BASED ESPECIALLY【T1】______A MATHEMATICAL OR LABORATORY TRAININGB.AMATEURS, ON THE OTHER HAND, HAVE【T2】______PURSUE LOCAL STUDIESC.ONE MAN COULD CONTINUE TO【T3】______THE INFORMATION SPECIALIZATION CAN BE SEEN AS A RESPONSE TO THE PROBLEM OF AN INCREASING ACCUMULATION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE.BY SPLITTING UP THE SUBJECT MATTER INTO SMALLER UNITS,【T4】_____AND USE IT AS THE BASIS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH.BUT SPECIALIZATION WAS ONLY ONEOF A SERIES OF RELATED DEVELOPMENTS IN SCIENCE AFFECTING THE PROCESS OF COMMUNICATION.ANOTHER WAS THE GROWING PROFESSIONALISATION OF SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY. NO CLEAR-CUT DISTINCTION CAN BE DRAWN BETWEEN PROFESSIONALS AND AMATEURS IN SCIENCE:EXCEPTIONS CAN BE FOUND TO ANY RULE.NEVERTHELESS, THE WORD "AMATEUR" DOES CARRY A CONNOTATION THAT THE PERSON CONCERNED IS NOT FULLY INTEGRATED INTO THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY AND, IN PARTICULAR, MAY NOT FULLY SHARE ITS VALUES.THE GROWTH OF SPECIALIZATION IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, WITH ITS CONSEQUENT REQUIREMENT OF A LONGER, MORE COMPLEX TRAINING, IMPLIED GREATER PROBLEMS FOR AMATEUR PARTICIPATION IN SCIENCE.【T5】______, AND CAN BE ILLUSTRATED IN TERMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF GEOLOGY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. A COMPARISON OF BRITISH GEOLOGICAL PUBLICATIONS OVER THE LAST CENTURY AND A HALF REVEALS NOT SIMPLY AN INCREASING EMPHASIS ON THE PRIMACY OF RESEARCH, BUT ALSO A CHANGING DEFINITION OF WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ACCEPTABLE RESEARCH PAPER.THUS, IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, LOCAL GEOLOGICAL STUDIES REPRESENTED WORTHWHILE RESEARCH IN THEIR OWN RIGHT; BUT, IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY,LOCAL STUDIES HAVE INCREASINGLY BECOME ACCEPTABLE TO PROFESSIONALS ONLY IFTHEY INCORPORATE, AND REFLECT ON, THE WIDER GEOLOGICAL PICTURE.【T6】______ IN THEOLD WAY.THE OVERALL RESULT HAS BEEN TO MAKE ENTRANCE TO PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGICAL JOURNALS HARDER FOR AMATEURS, A RESULT THAT HAS BEEN REINFORCED BY THE WIDESPREAD INTRODUCTION OF REFEREEING, FIRST BY NATIONAL JOURNALS IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY AND THEN BY SEVERAL LOCAL GEOLOGICAL JOURNALS IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY.AS A LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, SEPARATE JOURNALS HAVE NOW APPEARED AIMED MAINLY TOWARDS EITHER PROFESSIONAL OR AMATEUR READERSHIP.A RATHER SIMILAR PROCESS OF DIFFERENTIATION HAS LED TO PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGISTS COMING TOGETHER NATIONALLY WITHIN ONE OR TWO SPECIFIC SOCIETIES, WHEREAS THE AMATEURS HAVE TENDED EITHER TO REMAIN IN LOCAL SOCIETIES OR TO COME TOGETHER NATIONALLY IN A DIFFERENT WAY.

Studies have shown that the stature of an average Japanese has surpassed that of an average Chinese.A:weightB:heightC:life spanD:size

共用题干第三篇The Science of the FutureUntil recently,the"science of the future"was supposed to be electronics and artificial intelligence.Today it seems more and more likely that the next great breakthroughs in technology will be brought through a combination of those two sciences with organic chemistry and genetic engineering.This combination is the science of biotechnology.Organic chemistry enables us to produce marvelous synthetic(合成的)materials. However,it is still difficult to manufacture anything that has the capacity of wool to conserve heat and also to absorb moisture.Nothing that we have been able to produce so far comes anywhere near the combination of strength,lightness and flexibility that we find in the bodies of ordinary insects.Nevertheless,scientists in the laboratory have already succeeded in"growing"a material that has many of the characteristics of human skin.The next step may well be "biotech hearts and eyes"which can replace diseased organs in human beings.These will not be rejected by the body,as is the case with organs from humans.The application of biotechnology to energy production seems even more promising.In 1 996 the famous science-fiction writer,Arthur C. Clarke,many of whose previous predictions have come true,said that we may soon be able to develop remarkably cheap and renewable sources of energy.Some of these power sources will be biological.Clarke and others have warned us repeatedly that sooner or later we will have to give up ourdependence on non-renewable power sources.Coal,oil and gas are indeed convenient. However,using them also means creating dangerously high levels of pollution.It will be impossible to meet the growing demand for energy without increasing that pollution to catastrophic(灾难性的)levels unless we develop power sources that are both cheaper and cleaner.It is attempting to think that biotechnology or some other"science of the future"can solve our problems.Before we surrender to that temptation we should remember nuclear power.Only a few generations ago it seemed to promise limitless,cheap and safe energy.Today those promises lie buried in a concrete grave in a place called Chernobyl,in the Ukraine.Biotechnology is unlikely,however,to break its promises in quite the same or such a dangerous way.According to the passage,it may soon be possibleA:to make something as good as human skin.B:to produce drugs without side effects.C:to transplant human organs.D:to make artificial hearts and eyes.

共用题干第三篇The Science of the FutureUntil recently,the"science of the future"was supposed to be electronics and artificial intelligence.Today it seems more and more likely that the next great breakthroughs in technology will be brought through a combination of those two sciences with organic chemistry and genetic engineering.This combination is the science of biotechnology.Organic chemistry enables us to produce marvelous synthetic(合成的)materials. However,it is still difficult to manufacture anything that has the capacity of wool to conserve heat and also to absorb moisture.Nothing that we have been able to produce so far comes anywhere near the combination of strength,lightness and flexibility that we find in the bodies of ordinary insects.Nevertheless,scientists in the laboratory have already succeeded in"growing"a material that has many of the characteristics of human skin.The next step may well be "biotech hearts and eyes"which can replace diseased organs in human beings.These will not be rejected by the body,as is the case with organs from humans.The application of biotechnology to energy production seems even more promising.In 1 996 the famous science-fiction writer,Arthur C. Clarke,many of whose previous predictions have come true,said that we may soon be able to develop remarkably cheap and renewable sources of energy.Some of these power sources will be biological.Clarke and others have warned us repeatedly that sooner or later we will have to give up ourdependence on non-renewable power sources.Coal,oil and gas are indeed convenient. However,using them also means creating dangerously high levels of pollution.It will be impossible to meet the growing demand for energy without increasing that pollution to catastrophic(灾难性的)levels unless we develop power sources that are both cheaper and cleaner.It is attempting to think that biotechnology or some other"science of the future"can solve our problems.Before we surrender to that temptation we should remember nuclear power.Only a few generations ago it seemed to promise limitless,cheap and safe energy.Today those promises lie buried in a concrete grave in a place called Chernobyl,in the Ukraine.Biotechnology is unlikely,however,to break its promises in quite the same or such a dangerous way.According to the passage,the science of the future is likely to beA:electronics. B:biotechnology.C:genetic engineering. D:nuclear technology.

共用题干第三篇The Science of the FutureUntil recently,the"science of the future"was supposed to be electronics and artificial intelligence.Today it seems more and more likely that the next great breakthroughs in technology will be brought through a combination of those two sciences with organic chemistry and genetic engineering.This combination is the science of biotechnology.Organic chemistry enables us to produce marvelous synthetic(合成的)materials. However,it is still difficult to manufacture anything that has the capacity of wool to conserve heat and also to absorb moisture.Nothing that we have been able to produce so far comes anywhere near the combination of strength,lightness and flexibility that we find in the bodies of ordinary insects.Nevertheless,scientists in the laboratory have already succeeded in"growing"a material that has many of the characteristics of human skin.The next step may well be "biotech hearts and eyes"which can replace diseased organs in human beings.These will not be rejected by the body,as is the case with organs from humans.The application of biotechnology to energy production seems even more promising.In 1 996 the famous science-fiction writer,Arthur C. Clarke,many of whose previous predictions have come true,said that we may soon be able to develop remarkably cheap and renewable sources of energy.Some of these power sources will be biological.Clarke and others have warned us repeatedly that sooner or later we will have to give up ourdependence on non-renewable power sources.Coal,oil and gas are indeed convenient. However,using them also means creating dangerously high levels of pollution.It will be impossible to meet the growing demand for energy without increasing that pollution to catastrophic(灾难性的)levels unless we develop power sources that are both cheaper and cleaner.It is attempting to think that biotechnology or some other"science of the future"can solve our problems.Before we surrender to that temptation we should remember nuclear power.Only a few generations ago it seemed to promise limitless,cheap and safe energy.Today those promises lie buried in a concrete grave in a place called Chernobyl,in the Ukraine.Biotechnology is unlikely,however,to break its promises in quite the same or such a dangerous way.What do we learn from the last paragraph?A:Biotechnology can solve all our future energy problems.B:Biological power is cheaper than nuclear power.C:Biological power may not be as dangerous as nuclear power.D:Biological power will keep all its promises.

共用题干第三篇The Science of the FutureUntil recently,the"science of the future"was supposed to be electronics and artificial intelligence.Today it seems more and more likely that the next great breakthroughs in technology will be brought through a combination of those two sciences with organic chemistry and genetic engineering.This combination is the science of biotechnology.Organic chemistry enables us to produce marvelous synthetic(合成的)materials. However,it is still difficult to manufacture anything that has the capacity of wool to conserve heat and also to absorb moisture.Nothing that we have been able to produce so far comes anywhere near the combination of strength,lightness and flexibility that we find in the bodies of ordinary insects.Nevertheless,scientists in the laboratory have already succeeded in"growing"a material that has many of the characteristics of human skin.The next step may well be "biotech hearts and eyes"which can replace diseased organs in human beings.These will not be rejected by the body,as is the case with organs from humans.The application of biotechnology to energy production seems even more promising.In 1 996 the famous science-fiction writer,Arthur C. Clarke,many of whose previous predictions have come true,said that we may soon be able to develop remarkably cheap and renewable sources of energy.Some of these power sources will be biological.Clarke and others have warned us repeatedly that sooner or later we will have to give up ourdependence on non-renewable power sources.Coal,oil and gas are indeed convenient. However,using them also means creating dangerously high levels of pollution.It will be impossible to meet the growing demand for energy without increasing that pollution to catastrophic(灾难性的)levels unless we develop power sources that are both cheaper and cleaner.It is attempting to think that biotechnology or some other"science of the future"can solve our problems.Before we surrender to that temptation we should remember nuclear power.Only a few generations ago it seemed to promise limitless,cheap and safe energy.Today those promises lie buried in a concrete grave in a place called Chernobyl,in the Ukraine.Biotechnology is unlikely,however,to break its promises in quite the same or such a dangerous way.In 1996,Arthur C. Clarke predicted thatA:biological power sources would be put into use soon.B:oil,gas and coal could be repeatedly used in the future.C:dependence on non-renewable power sources would be reduced soon.D:the Chernobyl disaster would happen in two years.

Among the most popular books being written today are those which are usually classified as science fiction. Hundreds of titles are published every year and are read by all kinds of people.Furthermore, some of the most successful films in recent years have been based on science fiction stories.It is often thought that science fiction is a fairly new development in literature, but it can be found in books written hundreds of years ago. These books were often concerned with the presentation of some form of ideal society, a theme which is still often found in modern stories.Most of the classics of science fiction, however, have been written within the last hundred years. Books by writers such as Jules Verne and H.G. Wells, to mention just two well-knownauthors, have been translated into many languages. Modern science fiction writers don't write about men from Mars or space adventure stories. They are more interested in predicting the results of technical developments on society and the human mind; or in imagining future world which are a reflection of the world which we live in now. Because of this their writing has obviously political undertones.In an age where science fact frequently overtakes science fiction, the writers may find it difficult to keep ahead of scientific advances. Those who are sufficiently clear-sighted to see the way we are going, however, may provide a valuable lesson on how to deal with the problems which society will inevitably face as it tries to master its new technology.Which of the following statements can't prove that science fiction is very popular today 查看材料A.Hundreds of titles are published every year.B.All kinds of people love it.C.Some of the most successful films of recent years have been based on science fiction stories.D.Science fiction can be found in books written hundreds of years ago.

I am ___________grateful for the many kindnesses you have shown to my son.A.excessively B.muchC.certainly D.exceedingly

The report listed as new basics()AEnglish,mathematics,computer,social studiesBscience,mathematics,social studies,foreign languageCEnglish,science,social studies,mathematics,computerDEnglish,science,computer,social studies

The report listed as new basics()A、English,mathematics,computer,social studiesB、science,mathematics,social studies,foreign languageC、English,science,social studies,mathematics,computerD、English,science,computer,social studies

User A issues the command: LOCK TABLES pets READ; Which command can User B execute against the pets table?()A、UPDATE pets…B、SELECT….FROM petsC、INSERT INTO pets…D、ALTER TABLE pets…

单选题Which best characterizes how the impact of science on chimpanzees is treated in these two passages?AThe author of Passage 1 lauds the benefits science has produced, while the author of Passage 2 speaks hopefully of possible future benefits.BBoth of the passages react with distrust to the idea of using science to assess chimpanzees.CThe first passage lists the studies that showed positive chimp interactions, while the author of Passage 2 refutes their claims,DThe first passage suggests that science can have a positive impact on perceptions about chimps, whereas the second passage views science as almost universally negative.EThe author of the first passage is more apt to justify using chimps in science than the author of Passage 2.

问答题Previous studies have shown the longer the mom breastfeeds, the more benefit for her body.

单选题Many economic studies have tried to isolate effects of deficits.Aseparate Bgive up Creject Dchange

单选题Ivan: I brought you the new Groove People CD.  Dale: What good is a CD if I haven’t got a CD player?  Ivan: I can bring you a CD player.  Dale: What good is a CD player if I don’t even have electricity?  Ivan: ________.  Dale: What good is calling the Electric Company if I haven’t got a house?AWhy do you have so many questions?BWhat are you going to buy tomorrow?CWhy don’t you call the Electric Company?DWhere did you buy the new CD?

问答题We live in a society which there is a lot of talk about science, but I would   1.______say that there are not 5 percent of the people who are equipped with schooling,including college, to understand scientific reasoning. We are more ignorant ofscience than people with comparable education in Western Europe.           ?2.______There are a lot of kids who know everything about computers — how tobuild them, how to take them apart, and how to write programs for games. So    ? ? 3.______if you ask them to explain about the principles of physics that have gone into   ? ?4.______creating the computer, you don’t have the faintest idea.             ? ? 5.______  The failure to understand science leads to such things like the neglect of   ? ?6.______human creative power. It also takes rise to blurring of the distinction between   ? 7.______science and technology. Lots of people don’t differ between the two. Science is the 8.______production of new knowledge that can be applied or not, and technology is theapplication of knowledge to the production of some products, machinery or thelike. The two are really very different, and people who have the faculty for onevery seldom have a faculty for the others.                      ?9.______Science in itself is harmless, more or less. But as soon as it can providetechnology, it is not necessarily harmful. No society has yet learned to forecast   10.______the consequences of new technology, which can be enormous.