风险基金(venture capital)
风险基金(venture capital)
相关考题：
私募基金面临的一般风险，包括( );特殊风险包括( )Ⅰ.流动性风险Ⅱ.资金报失风险Ⅲ.基金未托管风险Ⅳ.基金委托募集的风险Ⅴ.募集失败风险Ⅵ.聘请投资顾问的风险Ⅶ.未在中国证券投资基金业协会备案的风险Ⅷ.基金合同与中国证券投资基金业协会合同指引不一致的风险A、Ⅰ.Ⅱ.Ⅲ;Ⅳ.Ⅴ.Ⅵ.Ⅶ.ⅧB、Ⅰ.Ⅱ.Ⅲ.Ⅳ.Ⅴ;Ⅵ.Ⅶ.ⅧC、Ⅰ.Ⅲ.Ⅴ.Ⅵ;Ⅱ.Ⅳ.Ⅶ.ⅧD、Ⅰ.Ⅱ.Ⅴ;Ⅲ.Ⅳ.Ⅵ.Ⅶ.Ⅷ
A financial ______ should be carried out for any potential venture in the manufacturing sector, in order to assess the relationship between production volume, production cost and profits.A．break-even analysisB．benefit streamsC．IRR analysisD．capital cost
A capital expenditure results in a debit to ( )A. an expense accountB. a capital accountC. a liability accountD. an asset account
下列关于増值型基金、收入型基金和平衡型基金的风险和收益的关系，说法正确的有()。A、增值型基金的风险大，收益高B、收入型基金的风险大，收益高C、平衡型基金的风险小，收益较低D、收入型基金的风险、收益介于增长型基金与平衡型基金之间
下列关于增长、收入、平衡型基金风险与收益的比较，正确的是()。A.增长型基金的风险>收入型基金的风险>平衡型基金的风险B.收入型基金的风险>增长型基金的风险>平衡型基金的风险C.收入型基金的收益>平衡型基金的收益>增长型基金的收益D.增长型基金的收益>平衡型基金的收益>收入型基金的收益
下列关于增长型基金和收入型基金的风险收益的比较，正确的是（ ）。A.增长型基金的风险大、收益高，收入型基金风险小、收益较低B.增长型基金的风险大、收益低，收入型基金风险小、收益较高C.收入型基金的风险大、收益高，增长型基金风险小、收益较低D.收入型基金的风险大、收益低，增长型基金风险小、收益较高
The venture-capital-backed firms are more successful because they.（ ）[A] have invested in innovation[B] are good at stock exchanges[C] have abundant funds[D] have increased employment
关于"基金产品风险与基金投资人风险承受能力匹配"的表述，以下错误的是（ ）A.基金产品风险超越基金投资人风险承受能力的情况定义为风险不匹配B.禁止基金销售机构违背基金投资人意愿向基金投资人销售风险不匹配的基金产品C.在销售过程中基金产品风险和基金投资人风险承受能力需进行匹配检验D.投资人不能认购或申购风险超越自己风险承受能力的基金产品
下列关于增长、收入、平衡型基金风险与收益大小的比较，正确的是（ ）。A.增长型基金的风险>收入型基金的风险>平衡型基金的风险B.收入型基金的风险>增长型基金的风险>平衡型基金的风险C.收入型基金的收益>平衡型基金的收益>增长型基金的收益D.增长型基金的收益>平衡型基金的收益>收入型基金的收益
根据以下内容，回答233-236题。The Hidden Price TagFor many small or recently established businesses, finding sources of capital can be difficult.Companies are often in need of funds before they can build a stable customer base, so they are forced to turn to investors. Many such businesses soon discover, however, that this borrowed money can come at a high price. If entrepreneurs are not careful about which investors they do business with, their companies can suffer the consequences.The most common problem, according to financial experts, are investment deals that allow the investor to take control of key operations away from the company's management. Struggling firms and new businesses facing mounting start-up costs can be easily tempted to take the offer that provides them with the most money, regardless of the deal's conditions.Unfortunately, the biggest investment usually comes with the most strings attached. For example, some deals give the venture capital finn seats on the board of the company it invests in.From this position, the investor has the ability to control all aspects of a company's operations,including decisions concerning mergers or sales. This situation may remain tolerable as long as the investor and the management share the same goals. Yet, the investor will inevitably choose to protect its own interests over those of the company, creating a conflict that the company is then helpless to prevent.The best advice analysts have for businesses seeking investment capital is to thoroughly analyze any deal before agreeing to it. Sometimes, the control that must be given up is worth much more than the money being offered.Who would be most interested in this article?A.An analyst working for an investment finnB.A member on the board of a successful companyC.A representative of a large venture capital groupD.An entrepreneur in need of funds for a new business
问答题Passage 1 Britain is still home to some of the world’s best scientists—but when it comes to giving them the money to turn their ideas into world-beating companies we are third-rate. True? “That’s gulf,” is the impatient response of Anne Glover, a leading venture capitalist. She believes this is the best time since the short-lived dot corn bubble for anyone looking to get their idea funded: “It’s never been better, except during the boom for a short nine-month period.” Not from the perspective of Noah Freedman, who has tried to get venture capital firms interested in Ionscope, a firm using world-leading science from Imperial College and Cambridge University. “I don’t think the situation has improved in the UK over the last decade,” he says. But Anne Glover, whose venture capital firm Amadeus Capital has backed businesses such as lastminute, corn, Cambridge Silicon Radio and Plastic Logic, points to the figures. Last year ￡lbn of venture capital money was invested in young firms in the UK—that’s more than a third of all the money invested across Europe. “We get beaten up all the time,” says Ms Glover, “but which other sector has as big a share of the European market?” And just as in other industries there are fashions in venture capital. What’s hot right now? Mobile technology, semi-conductors, and consumer internet firms, according to Amadeus—rather similar to what was getting funded during the last booming 2000. That ended with a bust which sawn many start-ups disappear and “was followed by several years in which venture capitalists seemed to have gone into hiding. But Anne Glover says they’ve come through the experience stronger. “The ones who have survived the boom and bust are experienced and well-funded and have similar global aspirations to the best entrepreneurs.” But Noah Freedman, an entrepreneur who was previously involved in Brainspark, an incubator for technology start-ups, says there is still a funding gap. Ionscope, which makes very high resolution microscopes, was not able to raise venture capital until it had sold its first products. “The bottom line is that in the UK, it may be easy to get venture capital money to fund growth of an established concept or business, but it is exceptionally difficult to get seed and start-up money for real innovation.” Anne Glover says the real problem is a lack of ambition, from both investors and entrepreneurs. “We maybe spread our money too thinly rather than concentrate on the best ideas. When we’ve got a world-leading company that’s the point where we need to finance it properly.” She says she spends more time trying to raise the ambitions of start-up firms rather than lower them. So what’s the lesson from those who have made it? Alex van Someren is one entrepreneur who did raise the money to create a successful global business. His Cambridge-based internet security company Ncipher raised venture capital money between 1996 and 2000, and then floated just in the nick of time before the stock market crash. He believes we are making progress: “Both investors and the people they invest in have become much more sophisticated.” He says the problem is not a lack of money or ideas. “There is plenty of both—but ideas are not the same as investable businesses.” But he says young companies are now more likely to turn to business angels—often people who have built their own firms—rather than venture capitalists: “Angels have done it themselves, so they bring more added value—and they’re willing to invest in businesses too small for venture funds to look at.” What Britain doesn’t have—despite attempts to brand Cambridge as Silicon Fen—is one area that can compete with Silicon Valley as a place which produces innovative businesses and the investors to fund them. But Anne Glover says we shouldn’t get hung up on the comparison: “You would find the same inferiority complex in Indiana or Wisconsin—Silicon Valley is unique. It’s difficult to raise venture capital anywhere in the world. Entrepreneurship is hard and don’t expect it to be easy.” The good news is that, when it comes to innovation, Britain has a growing number of entrepreneurs who have been there and done that. Many are now starting new firms or investing in other start-ups. Their only fear is that the latest boom in technology investment could melt away like the last one. 1. Briefly describe the last boom. 2. What advantages have the companies which survived last boom got? 3. What is the difference on capital choice for young companies between the last boom and this latest one? Why?
单选题Approximately $120 billion in venture capital is estimated as having poured into technology stocks during the late 1990s, creating a valuation bubble that burst in 2000.AApproximately $120 billion in venture capital is estimated as having poured into technology stocks during the late 1990s, creatingBDuring the late 1990s approximately $120 billion in venture capital is estimated to have poured into technology stocks and createdCDuring the late 1990s it is estimated that there was approximately $120 billion in venture capital that was poured into technology stocks, creatingDIt is estimated that during the late 1990s approximately $120 billion in venture capital poured into technology stocks, creatingEIt is estimated that there was approximately $120 billion in venture capital that poured into technology stocks during the late 1990s and created