单选题The manufacturers refused to take all（）for damage caused by misuse.AdutyBresponsibilityCobligationDshare
单选题
The manufacturers refused to take all（）for damage caused by misuse.
A
duty
B
responsibility
C
obligation
D
share
参考解析
解析：
暂无解析
相关考题：
The air crash was caused by the (). Thus, he should take all responsibility for that. A、crewB、pilotC、staffD、engine
A document used to indicate suspected cargo damage caused by rough weather would be the ______.A.cargo reportB.hull damage reportC.Master's Note of ProtestD.Unseaworthy Certificate
The Greek ship drifted and struck the portside of a Chinese ship，which ______ the bulwalk and Stanchions．A.caused damage toB.had collision withC.was damagingD.was causing damage to
Which is an example of cargo damage caused by inherent vice?A.TaintingB.Wear and tearC.Stevedore damageD.Heating of grain
Owners are to be responsible for loss of or damage to the goods or delay in delivery of the goods only in case the loss，damage or delay has been caused by the improper or negligent stowage of the goods．This means that ______.A.Owners are to be responsible for loss or damage even such loss or damage is not caused by the improper stowageB.Owners are only responsible for the loss or damage or delay caused by improper or negligent stowage．C.Both A and B are rightD.Both A and B are wrong
The Insurance Company shall be liable for ______.A.loss or damage caused by unseaworthiness of the insured shipB.demurrage of the insured ship and other indirect expensesC.reasonable expenses for ascertaining the loss or damage within the scope of CoverD.A，B，C are all wrong
Damage by ______ shall not be considered as handling damage．A.exposure to inclement weather conditionsB.carelessnessC.the use of improper gearD.moisture caused by condensation
材料:Some older decisions have held that the carrier，in order to rebut the presumption of liability resulting from the arrival in damaged condition of GOODs shipped undamaged，must prove not only that the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils，but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the carriers part．Most more recent decisions and authors，however，uphold the view that，in general，the carrier may rebut the claimants prima facie case simply by proving that the loss was caused by an excepted peril．At that point，the onus switches to the cargo claimant to prove that the true cause of the loss was the carriers negligence．Nevertheless certain Hague and Hague/Visby Rules exceptions，expressly or implicitly，also require the carrier to negative its own negligence in proving the exception itself．For example，a clause in the said rules expressly imposes on the carrier the burden of proving that the loss or damage occurred without its actual fault or privity and without any fault or neglect on the part of its servants or agents．The carrier，however，must truly prove the existence of one or more of the exceptions and their causative role in respect of the loss or damage．Conjectures and speculation do not take the place of hard evidence．A court has held：“Mere speculation will not overcome the prima facie evidence of a clean bill of lading”．问题：The carrier will be held liable for the loss or damage if _______．A.it is proved that he has privity to the loss or damageB.it is proved that the fault or neglect on his part is not the true cause of the loss or damageC.it is too onerous for him to demonstrate that the loss or damage is caused by what is beyond his controlD.if there are conjectures and speculationIn accordance with old decisions，the carrier will not be excused unless he has proved that _______．A.not only the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils，but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the his partB.the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perilsC.the harm did not result from any negligence on his partD.there are conjectures and speculationIn accordance with most more recent decisions and authors，the carrier will not be excused unless he has proved that _______．A.not only the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils，but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the his partB.the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perilsC.the harm did not result from any negligence on his partD.there are conjectures and speculationIt is concluded that _______．A.The carrier is not in a position to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perilsB.It can not be decided that whether the carrier has to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils because there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby RulesC.The carrier does not have to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils due to the fact that there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby RulesD.The carrier must truly prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils even there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby Rules请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！
The Hoover Administration（）to deal with the economic crisis.A、took effective measuresB、did not take any measureC、asked the private sectorD、refused to take strong government action
We are sorry to find that the damage（）the goods was caused by heavy rain during transportation.A、onB、forC、aboutD、to
单选题Under the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act of 1936，a vessel will be liable for damage to a cargo when the damage arises out of（）.Adelays due to seizure of the vesselBfire caused by fault of the carrierCstrikes or lockoutsDimproper stowage
单选题Cargo handlers should take the following precautions with the exception of（）to avoid damage from shifting.AKeep the loads as close to the rail or deck as possibleBIf cargo is likely to settle，make provisions to secure it after it has settledCThoroughly secure and shore all cargo so that it cannot moveDhen stowing cargo，avoid leaving empty paces
单选题Under the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act of 1936，a vessel will be liable for damage to cargo when the damage arises out of（）.Apoor stowage of cargo in a containerBfire caused by lightningCoverloadingDinherent vice
单选题The damage to the hatch cover was caused by your stevedores，and you ought to have known we never（）lies.AsayBtalkCtellDspeak
单选题A document used to indicate suspected cargo damage caused by rough weather would be the （）.Acargo reportBhull damage reportCMaster's Note of ProtestDUnseaworthy Certificate
单选题Damage by（）shall not be considered as handling damage.Aexposure to inclement weather conditionsBcarelessnessCthe use of improper gearDmoisture caused by condensation
单选题Owners are to be responsible for loss of or damage to the goods or delay in delivery of the goods only in case the loss，damage or delay has been caused by the improper or negligent stowage of the goods．This means that（）.AOwners are to be responsible for loss or damage even such loss or damage is not caused by the improper stowageBOwners are only responsible for the loss or damage or delay caused by improper or negligent stowageCBoth A and B are rightDBoth A and B are wrong
单选题We are sorry to find that the damage（）the goods was caused by heavy rain during transportation.AonBforCaboutDto
问答题Practice 1 ● Your company ordered from Maximum Company 50 tables. But when the goods arrived, you found that the sides of nearly all the tables are badly scratched. The damage appears to have been caused by rough handling before dispatch. ● You are asked to write to Mr. Cooper, sales manager of Maximum, and complain about the damage. ● Write about 60—80 words.
单选题The mayor made a radio _____ for help for the victims of the violent earthquake which caused great damage.AappealBfailureCobjectionDsupport