The Constitution's vague nature has given it the flexibility to be adapted when circumstances change.A:imprecise B:apparent C:clear D:easy
The Constitution's vague nature has given it the flexibility to be adapted when circumstances change.
A:imprecise
B:apparent
C:clear
D:easy
B:apparent
C:clear
D:easy
参考解析
解析：
相关考题：
(b) Explain the matters that should be considered when planning the nature and scope of the examination ofCusiter Co’s forecast balance sheet and income statement as prepared for the bank. (7 marks)
The lockmaster has given you permission to tie off on the lower guide wall to wait your turn to lock through．What should you be most concerned with ________．A.A downbound vesselB.An upbound vesselC.Current reaction when the lock chamber is being emptiedD.Current reaction when the lock chamber is being filled
The Constitution's vague nature has given it the flexibility to be adapted when circumstances change.A:imprecise B:apparent C:clear D:easy
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data?The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest.It is hard,the state argues,for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice.Enough of the implications are discernable,even obvious,so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police,lawyers and defendants.They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phone—a vast storehouse of digital information—is similar to,say,rifling through a suspect’s purse.The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant.But exploring one’s smart phone is more like entering his or her home.A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history,financial history,medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence.The development of“cloud computing,”meanwhile,has made that exploration so much the easier.Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy.But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life.Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.As so often is the case,stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing.In many cases,it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents.They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe,urgent circumstances,and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending.The court,though,may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole.New,disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections.Orin Kerr,a law professor,compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th:The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then;they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.The author’s attitude toward California’s argument is one ofA.disapproval.B.indifference.C.tolerance.D.cautiousness.
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data?The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest.It is hard,the state argues,for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice.Enough of the implications are discernable,even obvious,so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police,lawyers and defendants.They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phone—a vast storehouse of digital information—is similar to,say,rifling through a suspect’s purse.The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant.But exploring one’s smart phone is more like entering his or her home.A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history,financial history,medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence.The development of“cloud computing,”meanwhile,has made that exploration so much the easier.Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy.But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life.Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.As so often is the case,stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing.In many cases,it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents.They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe,urgent circumstances,and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending.The court,though,may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole.New,disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections.Orin Kerr,a law professor,compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th:The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then;they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.The author believes that exploring one’s phone contents is comparable toA.getting into one’s residence.B.handling one’s historical records.C.scanning one’s correspondences.D.going through one’s wallet
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data?The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest.It is hard,the state argues,for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice.Enough of the implications are discernable,even obvious,so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police,lawyers and defendants.They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phone—a vast storehouse of digital information—is similar to,say,rifling through a suspect’s purse.The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant.But exploring one’s smart phone is more like entering his or her home.A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history,financial history,medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence.The development of“cloud computing,”meanwhile,has made that exploration so much the easier.Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy.But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life.Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.As so often is the case,stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing.In many cases,it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents.They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe,urgent circumstances,and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending.The court,though,may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole.New,disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections.Orin Kerr,a law professor,compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th:The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then;they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.Orin Kerr’s comparison is quoted to indicate thatA.the Constitution should be implemented flexibly.B.new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution.C.California’s argument violates principles of the Constitution.D.principles of the Constitution should never be altered
Since June last year the yuan has appreciated 7% against the dollar.The rise in China's relative costs has been even greater given its higher inflation rate.With stimulative fiscal and monetary policy bolstering domestic demand.China's current-account su
It may be pointed out that warfare（战争）as practiced by man has no parallel in nature,This is to say that within the more highly developed animal populations of this earth,there is not now.nor has there been similar destruction within a species（物种）itself.In fact,one has to go to the lowliest forms of animal life,such as certain kinds of ants,to find anything comparable to human warfare.It is a curious fact that mankind appears to give the killing of his own kind a good reason by imaging that it is a"law of nature".There are now a lot of wrong ideas about the laws of nature,of which this is one of the most incorrect and fateful（致命的）.Political beliefs have been based upon it with results that have come near to destroying human civilization.The theory that war is a biological necessity.that it is nature′s method of controlling population and believing in the survival（生存）of the strong and the elimination（灭亡）of the weak,is totally wrong and insupportable.Within the last century.when wars have been common all over the world,the human population of the earth has almost doubled.The author of this passage seems to be the"law of nature".A.againstB.in favor ofC.uncertain ofD.very much interested in
It may be pointed out that warfare（战争）as practiced by man has no parallel in nature,This is to say that within the more highly developed animal populations of this earth,there is not now.nor has there been similar destruction within a species（物种）itself.In fact,one has to go to the lowliest forms of animal life,such as certain kinds of ants,to find anything comparable to human warfare.It is a curious fact that mankind appears to give the killing of his own kind a good reason by imaging that it is a"law of nature".There are now a lot of wrong ideas about the laws of nature,of which this is one of the most incorrect and fateful（致命的）.Political beliefs have been based upon it with results that have come near to destroying human civilization.The theory that war is a biological necessity.that it is nature′s method of controlling population and believing in the survival（生存）of the strong and the elimination（灭亡）of the weak,is totally wrong and insupportable.Within the last century.when wars have been common all over the world,the human population of the earth has almost doubled.What does the"law of nature"mean?You can find the answer in the passage inA.the first sentenceB.the fourth sentenceC.the seventh sentenceD.the final sentence
It may be pointed out that warfare（战争）as practiced by man has no parallel in nature,This is to say that within the more highly developed animal populations of this earth,there is not now.nor has there been similar destruction within a species（物种）itself.In fact,one has to go to the lowliest forms of animal life,such as certain kinds of ants,to find anything comparable to human warfare.It is a curious fact that mankind appears to give the killing of his own kind a good reason by imaging that it is a"law of nature".There are now a lot of wrong ideas about the laws of nature,of which this is one of the most incorrect and fateful（致命的）.Political beliefs have been based upon it with results that have come near to destroying human civilization.The theory that war is a biological necessity.that it is nature′s method of controlling population and believing in the survival（生存）of the strong and the elimination（灭亡）of the weak,is totally wrong and insupportable.Within the last century.when wars have been common all over the world,the human population of the earth has almost doubled.According to Sentence 2,which of the following is true?A.The destruction is similar to the killing of each other within human beings.B.There is not the similar destruction now,but it occurred before.,'C.There is never a time when we may see the similar destruction.D.The destruction is now a thing of the past.
It may be pointed out that warfare（战争）as practiced by man has no parallel in nature,This is to say that within the more highly developed animal populations of this earth,there is not now.nor has there been similar destruction within a species（物种）itself.In fact,one has to go to the lowliest forms of animal life,such as certain kinds of ants,to find anything comparable to human warfare.It is a curious fact that mankind appears to give the killing of his own kind a good reason by imaging that it is a"law of nature".There are now a lot of wrong ideas about the laws of nature,of which this is one of the most incorrect and fateful（致命的）.Political beliefs have been based upon it with results that have come near to destroying human civilization.The theory that war is a biological necessity.that it is nature′s method of controlling population and believing in the survival（生存）of the strong and the elimination（灭亡）of the weak,is totally wrong and insupportable.Within the last century.when wars have been common all over the world,the human population of the earth has almost doubled.The main idea of this passage isA.warfare is a"law of nature"B.warfare is not a"law of nature"C.warfare does not control human populationD.none of the lowlier animals,except ants,practice warfare upon their own species
Why are wages falling when the economy is growing fast for some employees？( ) A.The competition is too fierce in the international field for some employees B.The lack of flexibility to adopt new technologies C.International competition has lowered the marginal revenue product of low-skilled workers D.The extensive application of the AI technology
In the book"Nature",Emerson stated that（）Aman.s relationship with nature transcends the idea of usefulnessBnature is useful to manCnature is independent of man and has nothing to do with manDnature can only be used by man
Political parties are the basis of the American political system（）Abut there is no provision in the Constitution for political partiesBand the Constitution has clear provisionCbut the founding fathers had strong apprehension of political partiesDBoth A and C
In the book"Nature",Emerson stated that（）A、man.s relationship with nature transcends the idea of usefulnessB、nature is useful to manC、nature is independent of man and has nothing to do with manD、nature can only be used by man
In which situation is shredding XML data recommended?（）A、When the data is naturally tabularB、When the number of nodes are volatileC、When the data by nature has sparse attributesD、When the data is of low volume and requires a complex star-schema topology
（）has the sole right to interpret the Constitution.A、The CabinetB、The Supreme CourtC、PresidentD、Congress
Under which of the following circumstances would a technician use IPCONFIG /RENEW?（）A、After an unsuccessful rebootB、If a user’s IP address has been spoofedC、After using IPCONFIG /RELEASED、If the computer has an ARP address conflict
单选题Political parties are the basis of the American political system（）Abut there is no provision in the Constitution for political partiesBand the Constitution has clear provisionCbut the founding fathers had strong apprehension of political partiesDBoth A and C
单选题All of the following constitute special circumstances EXCEPT（）.AThree vessels meeting so as to cross each other's courseBA vessel meeting a vessel that is backing out of a slipCAn overtaking situation that has reached in extremisDA vessel fishing with nets meeting a sailing vessel
单选题（）has the sole right to interpret the Constitution.AThe CabinetBThe Supreme CourtCPresidentDCongress
单选题For a given displacement，the righting arm has its maximum value when（）.AKG is minimumBangle of inclination is a maximumCsmall-angle stability appliesDKM is a minimum
单选题Under which of the following circumstances would a technician use IPCONFIG /RENEW?（）AAfter an unsuccessful rebootBIf a user’s IP address has been spoofedCAfter using IPCONFIG /RELEASEDIf the computer has an ARP address conflict
单选题With a given load on the cargo hook，tension in a single span topping lift（）.Aincreases as the boom's angle to the horizontal increasesBis at a maximum when the boom is at a 45° angle to the horizontalCincreases as the boom's angle to the horizontal decreasesDdecreases as the boom's angle to the horizontal decreases
单选题In the book"Nature",Emerson stated that（）Aman.s relationship with nature transcends the idea of usefulnessBnature is useful to manCnature is independent of man and has nothing to do with manDnature can only be used by man
单选题The lockmaster has given you permission to tie off on the lower guide wall to wait your turn to lock through. What should you be most concerned with? （）AA downbound vesselBAn upbound vesselCCurrent reaction when the lock chamber is being emptiedDCurrent reaction when the lock chamber is being filled
单选题Besides a deep knowledge of human nature and human necessities, establishing a constitution of a state and deciding upon its powers require knowledge of _____.Athe liberties and restrictions on man’s rightsBthe things which facilitate or obstruct the ends pursued by the mechanism of civil institutionsCthe will of all the peopleDthe constitutions of many nations