The Progressive Movement wanted to（）in order to stop big business control.A、initiate strict government regulationB、have the government to fix pricesC、break up all the big businessesD、do away with rebates
The Progressive Movement wanted to（）in order to stop big business control.
- A、initiate strict government regulation
- B、have the government to fix prices
- C、break up all the big businesses
- D、do away with rebates
相关考题：
Many ______ large and big business ______ been built up from small ones. A. a, hasB. /, hasC. a, haveD. a, had
Why must local government keep his or her doors to every visitor ?() A.Economic development depends on it.B.The central government forces them to do that.C.In order to let more people enjoy the beauty of the sites.D.They are friendly and hospitable.
The Progressive Movement is a movement demanding government regulation of the _____ and _____ conditions. A.economy/politicalB.social/politicalC.economy/socialD.political/cultural
The short time schedule may be a big problem, but there are many other things we can do to catch up. (翻译)
电子政务的主要应用模式中不包括（ ）。A.政府对政府（Government To Government） B.政府对客户（Government To Customer） C.政府对公务员（Government To Employee） D.政府对企业（Government To Business）
（ ）–It’s raining heavily.Let’s stand under that big tree.–__________.It’s very dangerous to do so in such weather.A．We don’t have toB．Let’s goC．All rightD．We’d better not
The government will _____ a reform. in the educational system.[A] initiate[B] initial[C] initiative[D] intimate
The local government decided to merge the two firms into a big one.A:.motivateB:combineC:compactD:nominate
资料：It seems simple enough. Take all the line-forming and paper-filling busy work of the government, and put it all up on the Internet. Now, in order to report a pot-hole, pay your property tax, complain to an official or cast a vote, just log on and hit a few buttons. Goodbye bureaucracy, hello e-cracy?However, the shift to e-government is turning into one giant pain in the neck — technology isn't the problem, money is. The Gartner Group estimated that project spending for e-government will grow from $6.5 billion in 2010 to more than $16.8 billion by 2025.The cost worldwide over the next 15 years, however, is thought by some to reach or even exceed $600 billion.Citizens are of two minds — they like the convenience and flexibility of e-government, but they have shown no great interest in coughing up extra tax dollars for this purpose. E-government is turning out to be much more expensive than its early champions envisioned. Just because that a state's department of motor vehicles allows online auto registration doesn't mean it can shut down its physical stations. The cost of creating and maintaining an Internet presence must be added to the existing cost structure.Why so expensive? It's cheap enough for a regional forest service to put up a fire alert website. But mounting a comprehensive system of inputs and outputs that mirrors and in some instances supersedes off-line government structures is a mammoth expenditure, conducted with little assurance that emerging technological standards won't leave your effort in the dust.If this sounds eerily similar to the confidence wall dot-com businesses piled into last year, good for you, because it’s the same wall, the wall of reality, where money is still money, and because a thing is virtual doesn’t mean it’s free. It is a really big problem. We all know it is going to cost a ton of money, but no one knows where to go for the money.The passage indicates that the success of e-government partly depends on .A.having public confidenceB.having sufficient investmentC.lowering government spendingD.upgrading government technology
资料：It seems simple enough. Take all the line-forming and paper-filling busy work of the government, and put it all up on the Internet. Now, in order to report a pot-hole, pay your property tax, complain to an official or cast a vote, just log on and hit a few buttons. Goodbye bureaucracy, hello e-cracy?However, the shift to e-government is turning into one giant pain in the neck — technology isn't the problem, money is. The Gartner Group estimated that project spending for e-government will grow from $6.5 billion in 2010 to more than $16.8 billion by 2025.The cost worldwide over the next 15 years, however, is thought by some to reach or even exceed $600 billion.Citizens are of two minds — they like the convenience and flexibility of e-government, but they have shown no great interest in coughing up extra tax dollars for this purpose. E-government is turning out to be much more expensive than its early champions envisioned. Just because that a state's department of motor vehicles allows online auto registration doesn't mean it can shut down its physical stations. The cost of creating and maintaining an Internet presence must be added to the existing cost structure.Why so expensive? It's cheap enough for a regional forest service to put up a fire alert website. But mounting a comprehensive system of inputs and outputs that mirrors and in some instances supersedes off-line government structures is a mammoth expenditure, conducted with little assurance that emerging technological standards won't leave your effort in the dust.If this sounds eerily similar to the confidence wall dot-com businesses piled into last year, good for you, because it’s the same wall, the wall of reality, where money is still money, and because a thing is virtual doesn’t mean it’s free. It is a really big problem. We all know it is going to cost a ton of money, but no one knows where to go for the money.The underlined phrase “of two minds” in Paragraph 3 best shows that citizens’ attitude towards the e-government is .A.disagreeableB.mixedC.cautiousD.negative
资料：It seems simple enough. Take all the line-forming and paper-filling busy work of the government, and put it all up on the Internet. Now, in order to report a pot-hole, pay your property tax, complain to an official or cast a vote, just log on and hit a few buttons. Goodbye bureaucracy, hello e-cracy?However, the shift to e-government is turning into one giant pain in the neck — technology isn't the problem, money is. The Gartner Group estimated that project spending for e-government will grow from $6.5 billion in 2010 to more than $16.8 billion by 2025.The cost worldwide over the next 15 years, however, is thought by some to reach or even exceed $600 billion.Citizens are of two minds — they like the convenience and flexibility of e-government, but they have shown no great interest in coughing up extra tax dollars for this purpose. E-government is turning out to be much more expensive than its early champions envisioned. Just because that a state's department of motor vehicles allows online auto registration doesn't mean it can shut down its physical stations. The cost of creating and maintaining an Internet presence must be added to the existing cost structure.Why so expensive? It's cheap enough for a regional forest service to put up a fire alert website. But mounting a comprehensive system of inputs and outputs that mirrors and in some instances supersedes off-line government structures is a mammoth expenditure, conducted with little assurance that emerging technological standards won't leave your effort in the dust.If this sounds eerily similar to the confidence wall dot-com businesses piled into last year, good for you, because it’s the same wall, the wall of reality, where money is still money, and because a thing is virtual doesn’t mean it’s free. It is a really big problem. We all know it is going to cost a ton of money, but no one knows where to go for the money.What can we know about e-government from the passage?A.E-government is on the increase and well funded.B.The investment on e-government is adequate.C.Government officials’ interest in e-government is declining.D.E-government is convenient and flexible.
资料：It seems simple enough. Take all the line-forming and paper-filling busy work of the government, and put it all up on the Internet. Now, in order to report a pot-hole, pay your property tax, complain to an official or cast a vote, just log on and hit a few buttons. Goodbye bureaucracy, hello e-cracy?However, the shift to e-government is turning into one giant pain in the neck — technology isn't the problem, money is. The Gartner Group estimated that project spending for e-government will grow from $6.5 billion in 2010 to more than $16.8 billion by 2025.The cost worldwide over the next 15 years, however, is thought by some to reach or even exceed $600 billion.Citizens are of two minds — they like the convenience and flexibility of e-government, but they have shown no great interest in coughing up extra tax dollars for this purpose. E-government is turning out to be much more expensive than its early champions envisioned. Just because that a state's department of motor vehicles allows online auto registration doesn't mean it can shut down its physical stations. The cost of creating and maintaining an Internet presence must be added to the existing cost structure.Why so expensive? It's cheap enough for a regional forest service to put up a fire alert website. But mounting a comprehensive system of inputs and outputs that mirrors and in some instances supersedes off-line government structures is a mammoth expenditure, conducted with little assurance that emerging technological standards won't leave your effort in the dust.If this sounds eerily similar to the confidence wall dot-com businesses piled into last year, good for you, because it’s the same wall, the wall of reality, where money is still money, and because a thing is virtual doesn’t mean it’s free. It is a really big problem. We all know it is going to cost a ton of money, but no one knows where to go for the money.The author’s major purpose in writing this passage seems to .A.make suggestions on facing the reality and modifying expectationsB.advocate that e-government is costly and uselessC.explain why e-government is no longer popularD.persuade governments to cut the cost
Which statement about Belgium is NOT true?A.it is twice as big as Beijing.B.it has two major ethnic groups.C.it has gone through quite a few threats of division.D.it has no government.
共用题干第二篇I was blind,but I was ashamed of it if it was known.I refused to use a white stick and hated asking for help.After all,I was a teenager girl,and I couldn't bear people to look at me and think I was not like them. I must have been a terrible danger on the roads,coming across me wandering through the traffic,motorists probably would have to step rapidly on their brakes.Apart from that, there were all sorts of disasters that used to occur on the way to and from work.One evening,I got off the bus about halfway home where I had to change buses,and as usual I ran into something."I'm awfully sorry,"I said and stepped forward only to run into it again. When it happened a third time,I realized I had been apologizing to a lamppost. This was just one of the stupid things that constantly happened to me.So I carried on and found the bus stop,which was a request stop,where the bus wouldn't stop unless passengers wanted to get on or off. No one else was there and I had to try to guess if the bus had arrived.Generally in this situation,because I hated showing I was blind by asking for help,I tried to guess at the sound. Sometimes I would stop a big lorry and stand there feeling stupid as it drew away.In the end,I usually managed to swallow my pride and ask someone at the stop for help.But on this particular evening no one joined me at the stop;It seemed that everyone had suddenly decided not to travel by bus.Of course I heard plenty of buses pass,or I thought I did.But because I had given up stopping them for fear of making a fool of myself,I let them all go by.I stood there alone for half an hour without stopping one.Then I gave up.I decided to walk on to the next stop.At the request stop that evening,the girl________.A:stopped a big lorryB:stopped the wrong busC:made no attempt to stop the busD:was not noticed by other people
电子政务的主要应用模式中不包括（20）。 A.政府对政府(Government To Government)B. 政府对客户(Government To Customer)C. 政府对公务员(Government To Employee)D. 政府对企业(Government To Business)
The Progressive Movement wanted to（）in order to stop big business control.Ainitiate strict government regulationBhave the government to fix pricesCbreak up all the big businessesDdo away with rebates
You are an administrator of a small business network. You have one dial-up account at an ISP and want all computers on your network connect to the Internet. You have enabled Internet connection sharing. You do not want to initiate this connection automatically when a request for Internet reaches your computer. What should you do? （）A、You should uncheck “Enable on demand dialingB、Enable on-demand dialingC、Enable sharing a modem on one computer on the networkD、Configure a DHCP ServerE、Disable Internet Connection Sharing
（）are subsidies or tax rebates paid by government to encourage them to export.A、Export missionB、Export incentivesC、Export financingD、Export tariffs
按照交易对象分类，电子商务可以分为4种类型，即：B2C（Business to Customer）、B2B（Business to Business）、B2G（Business to Government）和（）。A、C2G（Customer to Government）B、C2C（Customer to Customer）C、G2G（Government to Government）D、C2B（Customer to Business）
As we all know, the government is now making every （） to set up a harmonious society.A、effortB、effectC、measureD、performance
单选题Henry Ford’s statement can be taken negatively because _____.Aworking people are discouraged to fight for their fightsBthere are many industries controlled by a few big capitalistsCthere is a conflicting relationship between big corporations and laborDpublic services are not run by the federal government
单选题What can be inferred from the passage?AA better way for online business is to do it on a small scale.BMost of the investors are near-sighted in online business.CIt is a wise thing to do online business other than fashion clothes.DOnline business must link to a big successful enterprise.
单选题The influence of business in the U.S. is evidenced by the fact that _____.Amost newspapers are run by big businessesBeven public organizations concentrate on working for profitsCAmericans of all professions know how to do businessDeven arts and entertainment are regarded as business
单选题The Progressive Movement wanted to（）in order to stop big business control.Ainitiate strict government regulationBhave the government to fix pricesCbreak up all the big businessesDdo away with rebates
单选题The government will have to work hard to（）the confidence of the people after the terrible event.Awin backBwin throughCcome up withDcome at
单选题Americans do not feel that blind _____ and implicit submission to the will of another is necessary in order to maintain good government.ApreferenceBconformityCconfrontationDobedience
单选题Several big media operations in the U.S. stopped broadcasting advertisement for on-line gambling becauseAThey are losing money in the business.BThey are afraid of being sued against by the government.CThey know it is doing harm to the young children.DThey are bankrupt.