单选题_____AraisonBenvieCbesoinDtort
单选题
_____
A
raison
B
envie
C
besoin
D
tort
参考解析
解析：
句意：“我”想要自己一个人生活。avoir raison de做……是有道理的。avoir envie de想做……。avoir besoin de需要……。avoir tort de做……是错误的。故选B项。
句意：“我”想要自己一个人生活。avoir raison de做……是有道理的。avoir envie de想做……。avoir besoin de需要……。avoir tort de做……是错误的。故选B项。
相关考题：
Where can wemost probably read this text?A.In s research paperB.In a tort story.C.In a travel magazine.D.In a student’s book.
In relation to company law, explain:(a) the limitations on the use of company names; (4 marks)(b) the tort of ‘passing off’; (4 marks)(c) the role of the company names adjudicators under the Companies Act 2006. (2 marks)
The defences and limits of liability ______ in this bill of lading shall apply in any action against the carrier for loss of or damage to the goods whether the action be founded in contract or in tort.A.requiredB.provided forC.requestedD.supplied
材料：The contract of carriage of GOODs by sea is usually concluded as between the shipper and the carrier，either directly or through their respective agents．Consequently，by virtue of the historic principle of privity of contract，only the shipper and the carrier have the right to take action against one another under the contract of carriage．The only clear exception to the rule was where the party having the right to sue assigned that right under a separate agreement to another party．On the other hand，when GOODs are sold（as they typically are）prior to shipment，the terms of sale generally result in the risk in the GOODs passing from the seller（the shipper）to the buyer（the consignee or endorsee，in the case of a bill of lading，or the party entitled to take delivery under a waybill）when the GOODs cross the ships rail in the port of loading．Therefore，although the law recognizes that the shipper alone has the right to sue the carrier in contract for subsequent cargo loss or damage occurring while the carrier had charge of the shipment，the shipper is not usually the party who actually suffers that loss．Frequently，also，depending on the terms of sale，the shipper will no longer be the owner of the GOODs at the time when the loss or damage occurs，and so will be unable to sue the carrier in tort．问题：The contract of carriage of GOODs by sea is usually concluded as between ________．A.the seller and the buyerB.the shipper and the consignee or endorseeC.the carrier and the consignee or endorseeD.the shipper and the carrierIt is concluded ________ that only the shipper and the carrier have the right to take action against one another under the contract of carriage．A.by maritime lawsB.by a mainstay of the common law in particularC.by virtue of the historic principle of privity of contractD.by shipping practiceWhen GOODs are sold prior to shipment the risk in the GOODs passes ________．A.from the shipper to the carrierB.from the seller to the buyerC.from the carrier to the shipperD.from the buyer to the sellerWhen GOODs are sold prior to shipment the shipper ________．A.is not usually the party who actually suffers the subsequent lossB.is usually the party who actually suffers the subsequent lossC.will still be the owner of the GOODs at the time when the loss or damage occursD.will be responsible for the loss of or damage to the cargo he shipped请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！
All around the world,lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism.But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.During the decade before the economic crisis,spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation.The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money,tempting ever more students to pile into law schools.But most law graduates never get a big-firm job.Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.There are many reasons for this.One is the excessive costs of a legal education.There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states:a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject,then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam.This leaves today’s average law-school graduate with$100,000 of debt on top of undergraduate debts.Law-school debt means that many cannot afford to go into government or non-profit work,and that they have to work fearsomely hard.Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers.Sensible ideas have been around for a long time,but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them.One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraduate degree.Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school.If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer,those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so.Students who do not need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business.Except in the District of Columbia,non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm.This keeps fees high and innovation slow.There is pressure for change from within the profession,but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.In fact,allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would reduce costs and improve services to customers,by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’efficiency.After all,other countries,such as Australia and Britain,have started liberalizing their legal professions.America should follow.a lot of students take up law as their profession due toA.the growing demand from clients.B.the increasing pressure of inflation.C.the prospect of working in big firms.D.the attraction of financial rewards.
All around the world,lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism.But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.During the decade before the economic crisis,spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation.The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money,tempting ever more students to pile into law schools.But most law graduates never get a big-firm job.Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.There are many reasons for this.One is the excessive costs of a legal education.There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states:a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject,then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam.This leaves today’s average law-school graduate with$100,000 of debt on top of undergraduate debts.Law-school debt means that many cannot afford to go into government or non-profit work,and that they have to work fearsomely hard.Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers.Sensible ideas have been around for a long time,but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them.One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraduate degree.Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school.If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer,those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so.Students who do not need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business.Except in the District of Columbia,non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm.This keeps fees high and innovation slow.There is pressure for change from within the profession,but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.In fact,allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would reduce costs and improve services to customers,by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’efficiency.After all,other countries,such as Australia and Britain,have started liberalizing their legal professions.America should follow.The guild-like ownership structure is considered“restrictive”partly because itA.bans outsiders’involvement in the profession.B.keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares.C.aggravates the ethical situation in the trade.D.prevents lawyers from gaining due profits.
单选题The defences and limits of liability（）in this bill of lading shall apply in any action against the carrier for loss of or damage to the goods whether the action be founded in contract or in tort.ArequiredBprovided forCrequestedDsupplied
单选题可以单选题场景中的某个物体作为发射器的粒子是（）.ABlizzardBSprayCPArrayDPCloud